Trump - Make America Great Again!

[Superman]

https://www.clintonfoundation.org/contributors?category=Greater+than+$25,000,000

greater than $25,000,000 donation
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 records.
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership (Canada) *
Fred Eychaner and Alphawood Foundation
Frank Giustra, The Radcliffe Foundation
Nationale Postcode Loterij
The Children's Investment Fund Foundation
UNITAID

$10,000,001 to $25,000,000 donation
Displaying 1 - 17 of 17 records.
AUSAID **
Stephen L. Bing
Commonwealth of Australia ** *
COPRESIDA
Tom Golisano ^
J.B. and M.K. Pritzker Family Foundation *
Kingdom of Norway [Government of Norway] **
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Denis J. O'Brien and Digicel *
Cheryl and Haim Saban & The Saban Family Foundation
Susie Tompkins Buell Fund of the Marin Community Foundation
The Elma Foundation
The Hunter Foundation *
The Rockefeller Foundation
The Swedish Postcode Lottery
The Victor Pinchuk Foundation
Theodore W. Waitt

$5,000,001 to $10,000,000 donation
Displaying 1 - 15 of 15 records.
S. Daniel Abraham
Sheikh Mohammed H. Al-Amoudi
C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, Inc.
Elton John Aids Foundation
Government of the Netherlands **
Irish Aid **
John D. Mackay
Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD) **
OCP Corporation
Michael Schumacher
State of Kuwait
The Clinton Family Foundation
The Coca-Cola Company *
The Wasserman Foundation
Tracfone Wireless, Inc.


$1,000,001 to $5,000,000 donation
Displaying 1 - 50 of 154 records.
100 Women in Hedgefunds
Absolute Return for Kids (ARK)
Acxiom Corporation
Jay Alix
Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa
Nasser Al-Rashid
American Federation of Teachers *
Angelopoulos Foundation ^
Gianna Angelopoulos ^
Anheuser-Busch Foundation
Smith and Elizabeth Bagley
Banc of California ^ *
Barclays Capital ^
Barclays plc
Mary Bing and Doug Ellis
Bloomberg Philanthropies
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina ^
Richard Blum and Blum Family Foundation
BMU - Federal Ministry for the Environment **
Booz Allen Hamilton ^
Carlos Bremer
Richard Caring
Gilbert R. Chagoury
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
Christy and John Mack Foundation
Cisco ^ *
Gustavo Cisneros & Venevision *
Citi Foundation ^
Clinton-Bush Haiti Fund
Stephen J. Cloobeck
Roy E. Cockrum
Victor P. Dahdaleh & The Victor Phillip Dahdaleh Charitable Foundation
Delos Living ^
Desert Classic Charities Inc
Robert Disbrow
Dubai Foundation
Duke Energy Corporation ^ *
EKTA Foundation
Entergy
Exxonmobil ^
Issam M. Fares
Raj Fernando
Ferraro Family Foundation
Fidelity Charitable Gift Fund
Joseph T. Ford
Wallace W. Fowler
Friends Of Saudi Arabia
Fundacion Telmex
Mala Gaonkar Haarman
GEMS Education
General Electric
Aileen Getty and the Aileen Getty Foundation
Ariadne Getty
GIZ, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit **
Vinod Gupta
HP [Hewlett-Packard Company] ^ *
HSBC Holdings ^
Hult International Business School ^ *
Humana Inc.
ICAP Services North America
Inter-American Development Bank *
Inversora Carso, S.A. De C.V. [Inmobiliaria Carso, S.A. De C.V.]
Jay S. Jacobs and The Timber Lake Foundation *
Sanela D. Jenkins
Robert L. Johnson
Walid Juffali
Dave Katragadda
Kessler Family Foundation
Michael and Jena King
Laureate International Universities ^ *
Jonathan and Jeannie Lavine, Trustees of the Crimson Lion Foundation *
Leslois Shaw Foundation
Lukas Lundin
MAC AIDS Fund
Masimo Foundation *
Microsoft *
Lakshmi N. Mittal
Monsanto Company ^
James R. Murdoch
Newsmax Media, Inc.
NRG Energy, Inc. ^ *
OAS S.A. ^
Open Society Institute
Jonathan M. Orszag
Peter G. Peterson Foundation
Pfizer Inc
PGA Tour, Inc.
Presidential Inaugural Committee
Princess Diana Memorial Fund
Procter & Gamble ^
Stewart Rahr
Paul D. Reynolds
Rilin Enterprises
Robertson Foundation ^
Salida Capital Foundation
Donald L. Saunders
Joachim Schoss
Bernard L. Schwartz *
Sean N. Parker Foundation
Walter H. Shorenstein
Silicon Valley Community Foundation *
Arnold H. Simon
Bren and Melvin Simon
Amar Singh
Michael Smurfit
Harold Snyder
Sol Goldman Charitable Trust
Steven Spielberg
Standard Chartered Bank ^ *
Starkey Hearing Foundation ^
Starkey Hearing Technologies, Inc.
State of Qatar
Sterling Stamos Capital Management, LP
Suzlon Energy Ltd. ^
Swedish Postcode Foundation
Swiss Re [Swiss Reinsurance Company] ^
T.G. Holdings
Nima Taghavi *
Tenet Healthcare Corporation
The Annenberg Foundation
The Boeing Company
The Coca-Cola Foundation
The Dow Chemical Company *
The Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation
The Eranda Rothschild Foundation [The ERANDA Foundation] *
The Ford Foundation
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. *
The Government of Brunei Darussalam
The Greater Cincinnati Foundation ^ *
The Howard Gilman Foundation
The James R. Greenbaum, Jr. Family Foundation
The Marc Haas Foundation
The New York Community Trust
The Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable & Educational Trust
The Sherwood Foundation
The Sidney E. Frank Foundation
The Streisand Foundation *
The Sultanate of Oman
The Walmart Foundation
The Zayed Family
Thomson Reuters
Toyota Motor North America, Inc. ^
U.S. Green Building Council *
United Arab Emirates
University of Southern California *
Verein Aids Life
Walton Family Foundation, Inc. *
Gerardo Werthein
Western Union Foundation ^
Frank White
Worldwide Support for Development *
Wyss Charitable Endowment
Yahoo! Inc
YPY Holding Limited ^


^ Indicates contributions exclusively for CGI activities such as memberships, sponsorships, and conference fees.
* Indicates a contribution was made by this donor in the second quarter of 2016.
** Indicates government grants.


----------------

foreign donors, bankers, non-profits and other organizations who made questionable large donations highlighted. and I'm sure I missed a few.

Shillary is bought and paid for.

 

[Superman]

note Bill Gates' many contributions via himself and his foundations.
but the man will likely donate as much to Trump to cover himself.

 

[IndySteel]

$1,000,001 to $5,000,000 donation
Displaying 1 - 50 of 154 records.
(ARK)

I knew it!

 

[Tibs]

I don't get angry. Tibs gets angry.

Yeah, when some ******** questions my allegiances to America, calls me a communist (when my family has stood up to and fought communists for decades), or suggests a nuclear bomb gets dropped on my head, well yeah, I tend to lose my cool a little.

 

[IndySteel]

Yeah, when some ******** questions my allegiances to America, calls me a communist (when my family has stood up to and fought communists for decades), or suggests a nuclear bomb gets dropped on my head, well yeah, I tend to lose my cool a little.

Lighten up, Francis. You bring it on yourself with all the communist propaganda that you post. Your family must think you're a traitor since you support a communist in this election.

 

[Tibs]

Lighten up, Francis. You bring it on yourself with all the communist propaganda that you post. Your family must think you're a traitor since you support a communist in this election.

It would help if you knew the first thing about communism, and what it actually is/was. And how current American political parties and politicians - yes, including Bernie, Hillary and the Democratic Party - are about as far away from communism as Mars is from the Earth.

 

[madinsomniac]

It would help if you knew the first thing about communism, and what it actually is/was. And how current American political parties and politicians - yes, including Bernie, Hillary and the Democratic Party - are about as far away from communism as Mars is from the Earth.

Actually while socialist democracies are different, democratic socialist are by definition communists...

 

[CharlesDavenport]

It would help if you knew the first thing about communism, and what it actually is/was. And how current American political parties and politicians - yes, including Bernie, Hillary and the Democratic Party - are about as far away from communism as Mars is from the Earth.

You can't be serious.

 

[IndySteel]

Trump slapped Crooked Hillary with the Detroit card. Well played.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trump-detroit-is-living-breathing-example-of-clintons-economic-plans/article/2598843

 

[Tibs]

Damn ***** ''establishment Republicans'' at it again. Poor Donald, can't catch a break.

50 G.O.P. Officials Warn Donald Trump Would Put Nation’s Security ‘at Risk’
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/09/u...ald-trump.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=0

Fifty of the nation’s most senior Republican national security officials, many of them former top aides or cabinet members for President George W. Bush, have signed a letter declaring that Donald J. Trump “lacks the character, values and experience” to be president and “would put at risk our country’s national security and well-being.”

Mr. Trump, the officials warn, “would be the most reckless president in American history.”

The letter says Mr. Trump would weaken the United States’ moral authority and questions his knowledge of and belief in the Constitution. It says he has “demonstrated repeatedly that he has little understanding” of the nation’s “vital national interests, its complex diplomatic challenges, its indispensable alliances and the democratic values” on which American policy should be based. And it laments that “Mr. Trump has shown no interest in educating himself.”

“None of us will vote for Donald Trump,” the letter states, though it notes later that many Americans “have doubts about Hillary Clinton, as do many of us.”

Among the most prominent signatories are Michael V. Hayden, a former director of both the C.I.A. and the National Security Agency; John D. Negroponte, who served as the first director of national intelligence and then deputy secretary of state; and Robert B. Zoellick, another former deputy secretary of state, United States trade representive and, until 2012, president of the World Bank. Two former secretaries of homeland security, Tom Ridge and Michael Chertoff, also signed, as did Eric S. Edelman, who served as Vice President Dick Cheney’s national security adviser and as a top aide to Robert M. Gates when he was secretary of defense.

Robert Blackwill and James Jeffrey, two key strategists in Mr. Bush’s National Security Council, and William H. Taft IV, a former deputy secretary of defense and ambassador to NATO, also signed.

Document: A Letter From G.O.P. National Security Officials Opposing Donald Trump
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/08/08/us/politics/national-security-letter-trump.html

Prepared to have this dismissed out of hand and deemed insignificant by Trump's mindless fanboys here at SN.

 

[Superman]

Damn ***** ''establishment Republicans'' at it again. Poor Donald, can't catch a break.

50 G.O.P. Officials Warn Donald Trump Would Put Nation’s Security ‘at Risk’
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/09/u...ald-trump.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=0



Prepared to have this dismissed out of hand and deemed insignificant by Trump's mindless fanboys here at SN.

wait ... hold up.

you're saying Donald Trump will put the nation's security at risk? a banner waving, t-shirt wearing, tattoed Hillary supporter is saying Donald ******* Trump will put the nation's security at risk?

that's classically ironic.

 

[Tibs]

wait ... hold up. you're saying Donald Trump will put the nation's security at risk? a banner waving, t-shirt wearing, tattoed Hillary supporter is saying Donald ******* Trump will put the nation's security at risk? that's classically ironic.

I'm not saying jack ****. 50 of the top conservative national security officials are saying that. Talk about classically ironic.

 

[TDX27]

The establishment GOP can't stand to lose. They would rather sacrifice the country for a win by their "inner circle". This from both parties has destroyed our country. The US has no soul today as it did even 20 years ago. It truly is a shame to see this great country die. All world powers have come to an end throughout history. I just never thought I would see it happen to the US in my lifetime but that is where we are headed.

 

[ark steel]

Fifty of the nation’s most senior Republican national security officials, many of them former top aides or cabinet members for President George W. Bush,

So, they worked in an administration that the liberals tell us was horribly corrupt and committed treasonous acts. We should listen to them now?

For all of these GOP people opposing Trump, if you think HC is better, that is why the GOP is losing it's constituency. If you had stood up to the Dems the way you are "standing up to Trump", you wouldn't be losing your constituency. If you had give and supported a halfway decent candidate, you wouldn't have Trump where he is.

GOP, you ****** it up, so STFU

 

[ark steel]

I'm not saying jack ****. 50 of the top conservative national security officials are saying that. Talk about classically ironic.

You don't agree with them?

 

[Superman]

I'm not saying jack ****. 50 of the top conservative national security officials are saying that. Talk about classically ironic.

you posting this here shows you support the sentiment.
otherwise, you'd not have posted it.

 

[Superman]

I anxiously await you disavowing Hillary's monumental and colossal fuckups regarding national security.

I'll start holding my breath now.

 

[diver]

Damn ***** ''establishment Republicans'' at it again. Poor Donald, can't catch a break.

50 G.O.P. Officials Warn Donald Trump Would Put Nation’s Security ‘at Risk’
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/09/u...ald-trump.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=0



Prepared to have this dismissed out of hand and deemed insignificant by Trump's mindless fanboys here at SN.

You just don't get it. They don't get it either. Every time one of these establishment guys spouts off, Trump gets stronger. I think it is safe to assume that these guys have helped to shape American foreign policy at some point. It has been such a bang up success, hasn't it? Not due to the guys on the ground, but due to the idiots that make the decisions. A lot of these people, if they were in the business world with their records of success would probably have been fired.

So I look around the world and see it blowing up at various spots. These guys were the guys that had a hand in that. Now I am supposed to take what they say seriously?

Remember the line, "The lady dost protest to much, methinks?" That's these guys. They see their influence going away if Trump wins, and they aren't going down without a fight.

 

[diver]

I'm not saying jack ****. 50 of the top conservative national security officials are saying that. Talk about classically ironic.

You are truly a horse's ***, though. You seem to be all concerned all of the sudden with national security? Donald Trump will have the nuclear codes!!! Oh, no.

Meanwhile the idiot that is our President gave $400 million in a ransom payment to the Iranians to build "infrastructure." Which means the bomb. If it wasn't so serious I would have to laugh at the term infrastructure.

 

[Tibs]

You are truly a horse's ***, though. Meanwhile the idiot that is our President gave $400 million in a ransom payment to the Iranians to build "infrastructure."

LOL you calling me a horse's *** is pretty rich. Given that your head is so far up your own ***, I do understand where that idea came from.

As usual, you and your cohorts here get pretty much everything wrong. And you do it so consistently, it tells me you get all your information from the same tired, stupid sources, ie breitbart et al. Just spewing out trash and lies till the sun goes down. Yawn, another day here in the SN-Trump echo chamber.

Read a little, learn the facts and get the historical record. You can thank me later.

One president paid Iran a ransom to free hostages, but it wasn’t Barack Obama
http://usuncut.com/politics/reagan-obama/

President Obama has come under fire from Republicans this week accusing his administration of paying Iran $400 million in exchange for American hostages. However, Republican outrage over this issue is hypocritical, given the GOP’s love of President Ronald Reagan, who was caught selling arms to Iran in exchange for American terrorists in 1986.

The uproar began when a Wall Street Journal editorial drew connections between $400 million being airlifted to Iran from the US on the same day that four American hostages were released by the Iranian government. Republicans were quick to accuse the Obama administration of negotiating with terrorists, a violation of US foreign policy.

“Whatever the Administration may claim, it is clear that this payment was a ransom for Americans held hostage in Iran,” Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) told Roll Call.

House Speaker Paul Ryan piled on, saying the payment was”another chapter” in Obama’s “ongoing saga of misleading the American people to sell this dangerous nuclear deal.”

Unmentioned by Republicans thus far is the incredible similarities of these allegations to the Iran-Contra scandal, in which President Ronald Reagan was caught misleading the American people about a secret arms deal in which the US sold anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles to Tehran in exchange for the release of American terrorists.

Reagan’s own diaries, published in 2005, explains the details of the arrangement. The following entry is from December 7, 1985:

“Day opened with “Rex” (our new dog) on our bed. I then had a meeting with Don R., Cap W. and Bud M., John P., Geo. Schultz and Mahan of C.I.A. This had to do with the complex plan which could return our 5 hostages & help some officials in Iran who want to turn that country from its present course & on to a better relationship with us. It calls for Israel selling some weapons to Iran. As they are delivered in installments by air our hostages will be released. The weapons will go to the moderate leaders in the army who are essential if there is to be a change to a more stable govt. We then sell Israel replacements for the delivered weapons. None of this is a gift–the Iranians pay cash for the weapons–so does Israel.

“George S. Cap and Don are opposed–Cong. has imposed a law that we can’t sell Iran weapons or sell any other country weapons for resale to Iran. Geo. also thinks this violates our policy of not paying off terrorists. I claim the weapons are for those who want to change the govt of Iran & no ransom is being pd. for the hostages. No direct sale would be made by us to Iran but we would be replacing the weapons sold by Israel.”

Reagan later more directly confirms the deal in a January 17, 1986, diary entry, where he writes “I agreed to sell TOWs to Iran.”

Ten months later, Reagan made a public statement after Lebanese news magazine Ash Shiraa wrote a story exposing the deal:

“The United States has not made concessions to those who hold our people captive in Lebanon. And we will not. The United States has not swapped boatloads or planeloads of American weapons for the return of American hostages.”

Barely six months after this statement, mounting public pressure forced Reagan to confirm what most of the nation at this point already knew:

“A few months ago I told the American people I did not trade arms for hostages. My heart and my best intentions still tell me that’s true, but the facts and the evidence tell me it is not. As the Tower board reported, what began as a strategic opening to Iran deteriorated, in its implementation, into trading arms for hostages.”

Unlike the Iran-Contra scandal, the $400 million payment to Iran at the center of the controversy surrounding the Obama administration has always been a matter of public record.

“This wasn’t some nefarious deal,” Obama said this week at a Pentagon press conference. “We do not pay ransom for hostages… It’s been interesting to watch this story surface. Some of you may recall, we announced these payments in January. Many months ago. It was no secret.”

President Obama has previously explained that the payment was the settlement of a decades old financial dispute weapons deal made with Iran during the Iranian Revolution in 1979, in which Iran paid the US $400 million for weapons that the US ultimately did not deliver. Secretary Kerry has said that the US made the payment in an effort to take care of old grudges between the nations leading into the Iran nuclear deal.

 

[Tibs]

I presume you'll also dismiss this guy as yet another establishment GOP insider that 'can't stand to lose.' Sour grapes, that's all, can't stand the thought of an outsider like Trump running the country.

General Barry McCaffrey: Trump Is Unqualified To Be The President Of The United States
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...resident-Of-The-United-States?detail=facebook

Retired Gen. Barry McCaffrey writes in the Seattle Times about the awful candidate that is Donald Trump and he doesn’t mince his words:

Trump sounds like a 12-year-old — a willful and abusive braggart. He is remarkably ignorant and uneducated about the world that we face and the means we may use to defend ourselves.

I served in the Armed Forces for 32 years. At retirement, I was a four-star joint-theater commander. In my considered judgment, Trump is unqualified to be the president of the United States and fulfill the role of commander in chief of the 2.2 million men and women of the Armed Forces.

Get that? “Donald Trump is unqualified to be commander in chief of the 2.2 million men and women of the Armed Forces.” That can’t get any more succinct.

Can’t wait to see Trump’s twitter statements about what a “loser” General Barry McCaffrey is.

Following his graduation from West Point in 1964, McCaffrey was commissioned into the infantry.

His combat tours included action in the Dominican Republic with 82nd Airborne Division in 1965, advisory duty with Army of the Republic of Vietnam from 1966–67, and company command with 1st Cavalry Division from 1968–69. During the course of his service, he was twice awarded the Distinguished Service Cross, the Purple Heart three times for injuries sustained in combat, and the Silver Star twice.

General McCaffrey's peacetime assignments included tours as an instructor at U.S. Military Academy from 1972–75, Assistant Commandant at U.S. Army Infantry School; Deputy U.S. Representative to NATO; Assistant Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS); and Director of Strategic Plans and Policy, Joint Chiefs of Staff.

During Operation Desert Storm, McCaffrey commanded 24th Infantry Division (Mechanized). Under his command, the division conducted the "left hook" attack 370 km into Iraq, leading to decisive battle victory in the First Gulf War and also putting troops in place for the final battle of the war. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_McCaffrey

 

[Tibs]

Nothing to see here, just more sour grapes from GOP insiders.

Michael Hayden, Former CIA Director under George W. Bush

“If he governs in any way consistent with some of the things he said as a candidate, I would be very frightened.”

Mark Hertling, Lt. General (Ret.) Former Commanding General U.S. Army Europe and Seventh Army

“I think there are many people in the upper echelons of the military that are very concerned not only about some of the things that Mr. Trump has already said he's going to ask the military to do, but more importantly I think there's an inability, at least the way it’s been seen, to take advice.”

Peter Mansoor, Col (Ret.) Former Executive Officer, Gen. Petraeus

“On what basis is he going to make his decisions? It certainly won’t be on any deep knowledge of foreign affairs and national security, because he doesn’t have any.”

Robert Gates, Former Republican Secretary of Defense

“He seems to think that he has all the answers and that he doesn't need any advice from staff or anybody else.”

Ronald Reagan, Former President of the United States

“There is only one sane policy: A nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought.”

 

[diver]

LOL you calling me a horse's *** is pretty rich. Given that your head is so far up your own ***, I do understand where that idea came from.

As usual, you and your cohorts here get pretty much everything wrong. And you do it so consistently, it tells me you get all your information from the same tired, stupid sources, ie breitbart et al. Just spewing out trash and lies till the sun goes down. Yawn, another day here in the SN-Trump echo chamber.

Read a little, learn the facts and get the historical record. You can thank me later.

One president paid Iran a ransom to free hostages, but it wasn’t Barack Obama
http://usuncut.com/politics/reagan-obama/

I laughed when I read that. Did you even read it? The article referred to 'American terrorists" at least twice. Who wrote it? ISIS? I am supposed to take anything seriously that is written either from that belief or by someone who has so little regard for fact-checking or proof reading that they wrote American terrorists at least twice?

Seems like somebody twisting themselves in knots trying to explain why Obama's ransom payment wasn't a ransom payment.

 

[Tibs]

Sure the typos are unfortunate, but are you denying the historical fact Reagan paid randsom to Iran for our hostages? He admitted doing so himself, sounds like you're in full denial.

 

[diver]

Nothing to see here, just more sour grapes from GOP insiders.

Why is it so hard to believe those with influence aren't going to give it up easily? Hell, they cheated Bernie on your side. He didn't even have a chance. The Republican establishment ****** up and let Trump get too far. In other countries they kill people who threaten the establishment. They can't get away with that here, so they throw temper tantrums.