• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Trump - Make America Great Again!

Status
Not open for further replies.
And "Jersey Shore" and "The Osbournes" got great TV ratings... and Trump is a member of the WWE HOF. Brilliant.

You speak of popularity as if it is a bad thing. Remember a little known senator from Illinois who didn't do his job, but damn sure looked good in front of a camera, who came out of nowhere and rode popularity to the Oval Office? Few to no credentials, no citizenship, questionable background - but a fine orator. And hip. Dude smoked him some reefer!

Yeah, we've seen you guys wrap your arms all around popularity and ratings and embrace it while turning a blind eye to material issues.

Weird how now it's a bad thing. Oh, wait...not weird at all. Double standards expected.
 
Yeah, because going against the will of the people....
The will of a few, mildly deranged people that want to move the country back a hundred years or so.
 
Here is a reality dose for you: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ Losing in almost every battleground state and, quite a few, outside of the expected margin of error. The train has derailed.
Indeed, the train derailed a while back, which everyone understands outside of the handful of delusional, foaming-at-the-mouth Trump fanboys that frequent this site. I wonder what that day will look like here at SN, when Trump kneels on his sword and is sent packing. I can see it now, we will get the blame game 24/7 -- dead people voted en masse, the MSM stole the election, Dems imported illegals to skewer the vote blah blah ad nauseum. We will get every explanation in the book. Not once, not even a single time, will any Trump supporter ever say what is so blatantly evident, that Trump is a deeply-flawed candidate who never stood a chance.
 
Last edited:
move the country back a hundred years or so.

is that what John Roberts and Scalia were going to do on the Supreme Court? Yet, that didn't happen, did it? Always with the fear mongering, yet blaming the GOP for doing that very thing.

What, exactly, would Trump do to move the country back 100 years? I assume you only mean any bad parts from 100 years ago, right?
 
You speak of popularity as if it is a bad thing. Remember a little known senator from Illinois who didn't do his job, but damn sure looked good in front of a camera, who came out of nowhere and rode popularity to the Oval Office? Few to no credentials, no citizenship, questionable background - but a fine orator. And hip. Dude smoked him some reefer!

Yeah, we've seen you guys wrap your arms all around popularity and ratings and embrace it while turning a blind eye to material issues.

Weird how now it's a bad thing. Oh, wait...not weird at all. Double standards expected.

Double standard, huh?

OK, name the democrats who refused to endorse Obama. There's upwards of 100 notable republicans not endorsing Trump.
 
Is Trump an anti-establishment candidate or anti-intelligence candidate?
 
Yup, everything fine and dandy in the Trump camp, just getting ready to take the victory lap. Lol, remember when Manafort was brought in to 'save the campaign?' Seems just like yesterday. Daddy Putin will not be pleased.

Donald Trump Overhauls His Campaign Team. Again.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics...paul-manafort-stephen-bannon-kellyanne-conway

Paul Manafort gets demoted and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon will become campaign CEO.

As Donald Trump loses ground in the polls to Hillary Clinton and his campaign continues to falter, he is once more shaking up his political operation. Declaring "I want to win" in an interview with the Wall Street Journal published early Wednesday morning, Trump announced that he is bringing on veteran Republican pollster Kellyanne Conway as campaign manger and Stephen Bannon, the executive chairman of Breitbart, as chief executive officer of the Trump team.

Paul Manafort, who has been running the Trump campaign since the ouster of Corey Lewandowski, will continue in his role as campaign chairman, but the reshuffle signals that his authority will be significantly curtailed, if he has not been altogether sidelined. Earlier this week, the New York Times reported that a "secret ledger" listed $12.7 million in cash payments to Manafort from Ukraine’s pro-Russian ruling party, which he advised up until recently. Manafort denied receiving the payments, but his controversial background as a lobbyist who has specialized in representing some of the world's most notorious strongmen and dictators has dogged him ever since he signed on with Trump. On Wednesday, the Associated Press reported that Manafort and another Trump aide, Rick Gates, had failed to disclose their efforts to influence US policy on behalf of the Ukrainian governing party of Viktor Yanukovych, the country's ousted leader, possibly circumventing rules requiring "foreign agents" to register with the US government. But it may have been Manafort's inability to rein in Trump, as much as his past clientele, that led to his de facto demotion.
 
Last edited:
Trump changing campaign managers reminds me of Daniel Snyder changing head coaches, and it will have the same result in the end.
 
Double standard, huh?

OK, name the democrats who refused to endorse Obama. There's upwards of 100 notable republicans not endorsing Trump.

Yet the GOP is the party accused of brainwashing and supporting whatever candidate because of the "R".....
 
Yup, everything fine and dandy in the Trump camp, just getting ready to take the victory lap. Lol, remember when Manafort was brought in to 'save the campaign?' Seems just like yesterday. Daddy Putin will not be pleased.

Donald Trump Overhauls His Campaign Team. Again.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics...paul-manafort-stephen-bannon-kellyanne-conway

Paul Manafort gets demoted and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon will become campaign CEO.

I think I'd be much more intere$ted in the numerou$ and prolific donation$ to the Clinton Foundation by pro$perou$ arab nation$ - $ome of whom u$e the death penalty as a puni$ment for being gay.
e$pecialy if I were a member of the party who $trives to place it$elf front and center of the LGTQABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP community.
 
Almost as bad as rigging an election..oh, wait. That is OK, now, I think.

no Dem alive has ever heard the name Bernie Sanders, so they're unsure who you're speaking of or what you're referencing.
 
Yet the GOP is the party accused of brainwashing and supporting whatever candidate because of the "R".....

Clearly not all of them. My contention is that if Trump wasn't running as a R, most of his supporters wouldn't be supporting him. Establishment voters, some of whom are sick of the establishment, but never willing to leave it.

It seems 60% of the voters claim to be libertarian by definition, but only 25% of them are willing to register or vote that way.
 
Clearly not all of them. My contention is that if Trump wasn't running as a R, most of his supporters wouldn't be supporting him. Establishment voters, some of whom are sick of the establishment, but never willing to leave it.

It seems 60% of the voters claim to be libertarian by definition, but only 25% of them are willing to register or vote that way.

The problem with that line of thinking is that entering the race as an independent wouldn't have given Trump nearly the same size platform as running under one of the big 2 parties. It was all about visibility.

You could say the same thing about Bernie Sanders -- he probably wouldn't have had near the following that he had if he ran as an independent.

Both candidates realized the best avenue for their candidacy was to win the nomination from the big 2. Trump was successful because his opponents were too 'establishment'. Bernie lost because the DNC was rigged in Hillary's favor since 2008.
 
I think I'd be much more intere$ted in the numerou$ and prolific donation$ to the Clinton Foundation....
Of course you would, as you turn a blind eye to the fact Trump and his closest circle have sold their souls to Putin and the Russians. It's pathetic those on the right have become such Russia/Putin-lovers, just over the span of a decade. Sleeping with the enemy, indeed.
 
I saw only two Hillary yard signs during my three mile walk last night. That's pretty rare for this area during a presidential election year. There are still plenty of Bernie signs around though.
 
Clearly not all of them. My contention is that if Trump wasn't running as a R, most of his supporters wouldn't be supporting him. Establishment voters, some of whom are sick of the establishment, but never willing to leave it.

It seems 60% of the voters claim to be libertarian by definition, but only 25% of them are willing to register or vote that way.

You miss my point. the media and libs constantly harp on the brainwashed GOP voters who march in lock-step. Slobbering at the radio to find out what Beck, Hannity and Rush tell them to do. Yet, Romney is proof positive it isn't true, while Hillary is proof positive that it is true for the Dems. They don't care that the primary was, literally, stolen from Bernie. it is all about the "D".

It doesn't matters what letter Trump has behind his name. ANYONE running against Hillary would, probably, get 25%-30% of the vote. Just as importantly, he is a candidate that the GOP doesn't even seem to want to support. His 'anti-establishment' status gets him a bunch of votes. The "R" behind his name doesn't matter for very much. Heard a poll the other day that 50% or so Trump voters say they are voting for him because he is running against Hillary. around 40%ish of Hillary voters are voting against Trump.

Just think of how awesome it would be if those 50 and 40% people voted for Johnson and Stein, respectively.

The media and the libs
 
Of course you would, as you turn a blind eye to the fact Trump and his closest circle have sold their souls to Putin and the Russians. It's pathetic those on the right have become such Russia/Putin-lovers, just over the span of a decade. Sleeping with the enemy, indeed.

or the nuclear material sale to Russians while Hillary was Sec of Defense?
 
Of course you would, as you turn a blind eye to the fact Trump and his closest circle have sold their souls to Putin and the Russians. It's pathetic those on the right have become such Russia/Putin-lovers, just over the span of a decade. Sleeping with the enemy, indeed.

tell you what, I'll get irritated about that as soon as you show a degree of discomfort in knowing that the candidate you are currently cheerleading for flat out CHEATED your beloved from obtaining the DNC nomination. Vast amounts of evidence support this, and not some "secret ledger". Though, I know --- you want to know who leaked this data and are not at all concerned with the content.

hippo
crate
 
While I am not a Trump supporter I scoff at this "Open Letter".
It's written by the big government, DNC-Lite, Quasi-socialist RINOS that gave us Milquetoast Romney and Crazy Old Man McCaine.

Those turds and their policies are why I left the party.

and, probably, people that Vis despises. But now he is OK with their opinion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top