- Joined
- Apr 13, 2014
- Messages
- 5,307
- Reaction score
- 4,795
- Points
- 113
When you frame the issues differently, like delivering healthcare/taxreporting/welfare/water/electricity, you can try to find the most efficient (long term lowest cost) to society.
When you attach politics and normative judgments to same, inefficient solutions to delivery issues will happen. Look at the IRS, its complexity and irrelevance of much of what it does for society.
Simple standards, which is probably what drove Friedman to his suggestion, are probably more efficient in the long term than solutions with a bunch of configurations/special interests that distort over time.
So many part of our government need to just go into the shredder and completely re-done.
I mean, I really don't want to change the TOTAL dollars on almost any issue. I'm not even a huge proponent of tax cuts because it's small peanuts in the scheme of things. Revenue is $3.5 trillion, expenses are $4 trillion.
It's just there is so much clutter within those two numbers in EVERY part, from IRS and collection of that $3.5 revenue is so many different ways (payroll taxes, payroll deductions, income deductions, sales tax, etc.) and God knows how we spend that $4 trillion is just about as wasteful as possible with mountains and mountains of rule books on doing it.
So much more could be done if we just scrapped everything and started over.