• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Venezuelans are eating zoo animals...

Because most people are like cattle or like children. The enlightened have to herd them and care for them.

If you ask a kid if he wants ice cream for breakfast he's going to ask if he can have it for lunch and dinner as well.

And while it may be great for the child, an adult knows what it leads to healthwise.

Well this pretty much sums up the cult of statism.
 
Anyone who thinks socialism is a good idea is a ****.

And/or works for the government and directly benefits directly off the backs of others.

And/or is a trustfundian who has no idea what its like to work for a living...

And/or is a professional student aka college professor who has no idea what life is like outside of the college arena..
 
Last edited:
It's 2017 ****. Stop playing that card.

Yes, and the American Civil War ended in 1865 and along with it slavery. Yeah...we have NO lingering effects from that..........
 
Because most people are like cattle or like children. The enlightened have to herd them and care for them.

If you ask a kid if he wants ice cream for breakfast he's going to ask if he can have it for lunch and dinner as well.

And while it may be great for the child, an adult knows what it leads to healthwise.

liberal elitism in a nutshell
 
Yes, and the American Civil War ended in 1865 and along with it slavery. Yeah...we have NO lingering effects from that..........

I wonder what Africans who are continually battling warlords, starvation, ebola, etc. feel about living in that country. If given a choice I wonder if they would decide to move to this awful place.
 
I wonder what Africans who are continually battling warlords, starvation, ebola, etc. feel about living in that country. If given a choice I wonder if they would decide to move to this awful place.

Africa today is also the product of colonialism.
 
I've often wondered where in the world people of color are given more freedom and opportunities than here.

We have neighbors down the street who now own about 10 convenience stores in this area and they are first generation from India. You never see them because they are ALWAYS working but they do not look like they are having any problems with this country. Nice folks too.
 
I've often wondered where in the world people of color are given more freedom and opportunities than here.

If more immigrants are good for the economy, why is every place that immigrants come from a Third World shithole?
 
America today is the product of corpocracy. America also had a unique colonial situation both in terms of length of rule and race.

Corporatocracy:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatocracy

Corporatocracy is a recent term used to refer to an economic and political system controlled by corporations or corporate interests.[1] It is most often used today as a term to describe the current economic situation in a particular country, especially the United States.[2][3] This is different from corporatism, which is the organisation of society into groups with common interests. Corporatocracy as a term is often used by observers across the political spectrum.[2][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]

Economist Jeffrey Sachs described the United States as a corporatocracy in The Price of Civilization (2011).[16] He suggested that it arose from four trends: weak national parties and strong political representation of individual districts, the large U.S. military establishment after World War II, big corporate money financing election campaigns, and globalization tilting the balance away from workers.[16]

This collective is what author C Wright Mills in 1956 called the 'power elite', wealthy individuals who hold prominent positions in corporatocracies. They control the process of determining a society's economic and political policies.[17]

The concept has been used in explanations of bank bailouts, excessive pay for CEOs, as well as complaints such as the exploitation of national treasuries, people, and natural resources.[18] It has been used by critics of globalization,[19] sometimes in conjunction with criticism of the World Bank[20] or unfair lending practices,[18] as well as criticism of "free trade agreements".[19]


Edmund Phelps published an analysis in 2010 theorizing that the cause of income inequality is not free market capitalism, but instead is the result of the rise of corporatization.[21] Corporatization, in his view, is the antithesis of free market capitalism. It is characterized by semi-monopolistic organizations and banks, big employer confederations, often acting with complicit state institutions in ways that discourage (or block) the natural workings of a free economy. The primary effects of corporatization are the consolidation of economic power and wealth with end results being the attrition of entrepreneurial and free market dynamism.

His follow-up book, Mass Flourishing, further defines corporatization by the following attributes: power-sharing between government and large corporations (exemplified in the U.S. by widening government power in areas such as financial services, healthcare, and energy through regulation), an expansion of corporate lobbying and campaign support in exchange for government reciprocity, escalation in the growth and influence of financial and banking sectors, increased consolidation of the corporate landscape through merger and acquisition (with ensuing increases in corporate executive compensation), increased potential for corporate/government corruption and malfeasance, and a lack of entrepreneurial and small business development leading to lethargic and stagnant economic conditions.

-------------------

Maybe we can agree that we need to keep the government and corporations separated, and that bringing back a true free market would lower costs, increase efficiency and improve the product quality.
 
If more immigrants are good for the economy, why is every place that immigrants come from a Third World shithole?

I have an employee in Mexico who works in the steel mills, checking inventory of our chemicals and testing for the proper concentration in solution. I pay him $12,000 / year. For the hours he puts in that equates to $4.44 / hour. And it's decent money for blue collar labor there. Here, he would be required to join the Steelworkers Union and pull in $75,000 / year.
 
We have neighbors down the street who now own about 10 convenience stores in this area and they are first generation from India. You never see them because they are ALWAYS working but they do not look like they are having any problems with this country. Nice folks too.

That is a lie. There is no way they could overcome white privelege. Elfie said so.
 
I have an employee in Mexico who works in the steel mills, checking inventory of our chemicals and testing for the proper concentration in solution. I pay him $12,000 / year. For the hours he puts in that equates to $4.44 / hour. And it's decent money for blue collar labor there. Here, he would be required to join the Steelworkers Union and pull in $75,000 / year.

But NAFTA is good right? Lmfao


Sent from my iPhone using Steeler Nation mobile app
 
I have an employee in Mexico who works in the steel mills, checking inventory of our chemicals and testing for the proper concentration in solution. I pay him $12,000 / year. For the hours he puts in that equates to $4.44 / hour. And it's decent money for blue collar labor there. Here, he would be required to join the Steelworkers Union and pull in $75,000 / year.

I have previous experience doing inventory control at a hospital warehouse. I'll take the $75k job if you have an opening. :nod:
 
I'm honestly about ready to turn Elfie off. He's going off the deep end in many a thread these days.

That said, I kind of agree with the corporatocracy idea. I think government (and specifically Republicans) have not been doing enough to create and protect true free market ideals. They have protected the well-being of the super-corporations it seems to me above protecting the ideals of simple business creation and fair practice and anti-monopoly checks/balances.

I'm not sure which side of the aisle anymore sticks up for the protection, creation and ability to start small business and its ability to compete fairly against the megalopolis/global industrial elites. I don't think it's the Republicans or the Democrats.
 
I have an employee in Mexico who works in the steel mills, checking inventory of our chemicals and testing for the proper concentration in solution. I pay him $12,000 / year. For the hours he puts in that equates to $4.44 / hour. And it's decent money for blue collar labor there. Here, he would be required to join the Steelworkers Union and pull in $75,000 / year.

So, you are underpaying this poor guy by $63,000?
 
Top