• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Well, maybe the Clintons and their Foundation aren't off the hook just yet.

Sarge

Well-known member
Contributor
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
11,475
Reaction score
17,460
Points
113
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cl...th-hundreds-of-pages-of-evidence-meadows-says

Lots of interesting stuff coming out thanks to some concerned citizens that want to reign in some of the lawlessness of the Clinton enterprise. I personally applaud these individuals for standing up to the Clinton machine in spite of the threat that they could very well be suicided.

37240099905_ebdef6a53e_b.jpg
 
Oh those charitable Clintons...

Clinton Foundation whistleblowers have come forward with hundreds of pages of evidence, Meadows says

Three people have come forward with hundreds of pages of evidence of potential wrongdoing by the Clinton Foundation, including misappropriation of funds and allegations of quid-pro-quo promises made to donors during Hillary Clinton's tenure as secretary of state, Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., told Fox News on Thursday.

Meadows, the leader of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, is also the chairman of the House Oversight Subcommittee on Government Operations. The panel is set to hold an investigative hearing next week on the status of the Foundation case.


U.S. Attorney John Huber was tasked to investigate the foundation last year by then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

The Clinton Foundation consistently has maintained that it is a charity, and never traded on Hillary Clinton's position as America's top diplomat, which she held from 2009-2013. The organization has a four-star rating from the watchdog site Charity Navigator and has touted its mission "to create economic opportunity, improve public health, and inspire civic engagement and service."

However, The Hill reported Thursday that prosecutors working for Huber recently requested documents from a private investigative firm that also has been looking into the foundation. The firm, MDA Analytics LLC, reportedly has contacted the IRS, the Justice Department and the FBI's Little Rock office with evidence from its own investigation.

In addition, The Hill reported that a whistleblower submission filed with the FBI and IRS in August 2017 included internal legal reviews that the Clinton Foundation conducted between 2008 and 2011. Those reviews raised concerns about legal compliance and improper mingling of personal and charity business.

According to the Hill report, MDA investigators met with Clinton Foundation CFO Andrew Kessel in late November 2016. During the meeting, Kessel said that "one of the biggest problems was [former President Bill] Clinton’s commingling and use of business and donated funds and his personal expenses." A separate interview memo stated that Bill Clinton "mixes and matches his personal business with that of the foundation. Many people within the foundation have tried to caution him about this but he does not listen, and there really is no talking to him."

Last week, Fox News reported that newly filed tax documents showed donations to the Clinton Foundation plunged in the wake of Hillary Clinton's loss to Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election. The filings showed that the foundation took in $26.6 million in 2017, a 58 percent drop from the $62.9 million it received the previous year.

A spokesman for the foundation told The New York Post the drop was “largely attributable to the absence of sponsorship and membership contributions for [the Clinton Global Initiative]", which wrapped up in 2016. However, Meadows said that the donation drop "raises grave concerns their operations were not above board as the American people have been led to believe.


"Whenever we look at the possibility of 'pay to play' by government officials, current or former, it demands answers," Meadows added, "and anyone who uses public office to sell access for their own financial benefit must be held accountable."
 
Not to worry the dems take over congress next month.
 
Yeah, but look over there. Trump.

Sent from my SCH-I605 using Steeler Nation mobile app

In fairness Trump has his own problems. That said, oh how I’d love to see an unrestrained special counsel dig into the Clintons the way they have Trump. It would dwarf anything they might find on Trump. Not gonna hold my breath though.
 
Maybe you could have posted this in Sarge's thread.
 
Maybe you could have posted this in Sarge's thread.

Damn how did I not see that?

Sorry mods. Please delete and merge these threads
 
  • Like
Reactions: BAS
In fairness Trump has his own problems. That said, oh how I’d love to see an unrestrained special counsel dig into the Clintons the way they have Trump. It would dwarf anything they might find on Trump. Not gonna hold my breath though.

This I don't get. I simply don't.

Why and how is it that the Democrats hold this level of power Republicans simply do not?

We have ample REAL evidence of Clinton collusion with Russia, money exchanging hands, political positions being used to transfer American assets to an enemy of the state, money flowing back into their foundation. We have real evidence of her felonies committed with the servers. The 23 Clinton scandals. Everything WikiLeaks exposed about the DNC and those illegalities. Fast n Furious and Obama's scandals. Many worse than "Russia," and many when added together infinitely worse than the Russian hoax.

Yet crickets. Nothing. No special counsel. No independent investigation.

If the notion of a Special Counsel is brought up, it's laughed off. Never materializes. Everyone points to how the Democrats investigated themselves and says it's already been done, don't need to do it again.

How is it that Dims can demand investigations, special counsels, scrutiny and it happens. But Republicans demand similar and it never materializes. How and why do the Dims skate by one felony after another? How are these issues NEVER legally investigated by an independent party? Is it because Repubs have been too weak? Rinos?
 
This I don't get. I simply don't.

Why and how is it that the Democrats hold this level of power Republicans simply do not?

We have ample REAL evidence of Clinton collusion with Russia, money exchanging hands, political positions being used to transfer American assets to an enemy of the state, money flowing back into their foundation. We have real evidence of her felonies committed with the servers. The 23 Clinton scandals. Everything WikiLeaks exposed about the DNC and those illegalities. Fast n Furious and Obama's scandals. Many worse than "Russia," and many when added together infinitely worse than the Russian hoax.

Yet crickets. Nothing. No special counsel. No independent investigation.

If the notion of a Special Counsel is brought up, it's laughed off. Never materializes. Everyone points to how the Democrats investigated themselves and says it's already been done, don't need to do it again.

How is it that Dims can demand investigations, special counsels, scrutiny and it happens. But Republicans demand similar and it never materializes. How and why do the Dims skate by one felony after another? How are these issues NEVER legally investigated by an independent party? Is it because Repubs have been too weak? Rinos?

public perception
when the left attacked President Trump immediately after the election, those of us who didn't vote for Hildebeast saw it as a petty, loser-filled lashing out. Yet, what they did served a secondary purpose, one that they may not have even intended. If a special counsel is now told to look at the Clintons, as you said - it is met with pushback. It would also be seen by the majority of voters (see what I did there) as a petty, under-handed get-revenge tactic by the Conservatives. Every single one of us knows that Hildebeast's actions are not and were never those of an innocent person. Yet the vast majority of the population who voted couldn't care less. In their eyes, President Trump exemplifies everything they've been indoctrinated to believe. Racist? Trump. Misogynist? Trump. Bully? Trump. Homophobic? Trump. Islamaphobic? Trump. Can any of this be proven? No. It can all be disproven, but the like-minded never-Trumpers in a SJW vacuum refuse to believe that they can be wrong. If Trump were to want an investigation into Hillary (I believe he will once Mueller falls flat on his face), then you'd see the Left and those who may lean more left than right get even more riled up and hateful. Think Tiberius is unhinged now? Appoint a special counsel to investigate Hillary and **** will be nuclear.
 
Top