BamaSteeler52
Registered
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2022
- Messages
- 711
- Reaction score
- 343
- Points
- 63
A strong arm and running... Tomlin gets distracted by shinny things. He can't see his major flaws, Tomlin will waste years trying to justify over drafting him.
Ben was viewed as a projecet. The only reason he contributed his first year was because both Maddox and Batch were injured.The point was they had a first round grade on Rudolph. They obviously have a first round grade on Willis but hopefully they pass on him for n the first like they did with Rudolph. I would never spend a first on a project. I want my first round pick contributing the first year.
I don’t think Willis is anywhere near where Ben was when he was drafted. I never thought Ben was a project, hell he took his team as far as the AFCC his rookie year. Won what, 14 straight games, rookie of the year.Ben was viewed as a projecet. The only reason he contributed his first year was because both Maddox and Batch were injured.
Not saying Willis will be anything like Ben. But, Ben proves the flaw in your argument and highlights just how inexact of a science draft evaluation is.
The point wasn't what Ben accomplished his rookie year. Nor did I say that Willis was near what Ben was (in fact, I said: "Not saying Willis will be anything like Ben").I don’t think Willis is anywhere near where Ben was when he was drafted. I never thought Ben was a project, hell he took his team as far as the AFCC his rookie year. Won what, 14 straight games, rookie of the year.
He started the year behind Maddox because Maddox was the incumbent and hadn’t done anything to lose his job. I’ve never believed that Cowher was truely in Ben’s camp and actually wanted an OL Andrews but got over ruled by the Rooney’s.The point wasn't what Ben accomplished his rookie year. Nor did I say that Willis was near what Ben was (in fact, I said: "Not saying Willis will be anything like Ben").
The point was that no matter what anyone else thought, the Steelers viewed him as a project. Otherwise, he wouldn't have started the year behind Maddox AND Batch on the depth chart and needed both to be injured in order to get on the field. Or maybe he would have eventually and Cowher just made a mistake in not starting him to begin the season.
I think they believed that Ben, coming from the MAC, was a bit raw (AKA a project) and needed time to get up to speed with the NFL game. But, that's just my opinion.
Kinda like we all have opinions on ALL of this year's QB. Mine is that I don't want any of them at 1-20. Not a one.
I respect your willingness to share your opinion. We have Trubisky, Rudolph and Haskins. So, as fans, we'll initially have to get behind whichever QB emerges as QB1. I think that will be Trubisky. I'm not willing to anoint him (or any of the other QBs currently on the roster) until they prove it. I'll be rooting for that to happen.He started the year behind Maddox because Maddox was the incumbent and hadn’t done anything to lose his job. I’ve never believed that Cowher was truely in Ben’s camp and actually wanted an OL Andrews but got over ruled by the Rooney’s.
Don’t know if they viewed him as a project but think they had their QB for that season in Maddox. Most likely wanted Ben to carry clipboard and learn that first year but injury to Maddox dealt different cards and as fate would have it, a legend was born
Willis may turn out to be spectacular or could turn out to be a huge bust, but I’m not in his camp and think that Trubisky if given a fair chance will do very good things here.
I respect your willingness to share your opinion. We have Trubisky, Rudolph and Haskins. So, as fans, we'll initially have to get behind whichever QB emerges as QB1. I think that will be Trubisky. I'm not willing to anoint him (or any of the other QBs currently on the roster) until they prove it. I'll be rooting for that to happen.
As you say, Willis could be spectacular or a bust. That's how the draft operates. Pickett, Corral, Howell, Strong ... any of them could bust. Rarely do you get a "sure thing" at the QB position. Again, I'm not advocating that they pick Willis or any of the QBs that may be available this year. I'd rather they go Davis, or one of the top WRs/CBs if available. Although, as a football fan, it will be interesting to see which, if any, of these QBs prove to have the "IT" factor down the road.
Now he will play for a blockhead in Tomlin (and Canada) who will do nothing to enhance Mitch's play. MT is on his own...will have to use his own wit and experience. No offensive type folks in this org. to help him along. Mitch will be a rock...an island.he truly played for a blockhead in Nagy who did nothing to enhance Mitch’s play
Well let’s hold off on Tomlin and Canada and see what happens with a much younger more mobile QB. They may surprise us so m going into this with an objective open mind and giving these two my benefit of the doubt. We shall see!Now he will play for a blockhead in Tomlin (and Canada) who will do nothing to enhance Mitch's play. MT is on his own...will have to use his own wit and experience. No offensive type folks in this org. to help him along. Mitch will be a rock...an island.
Don’t go into a downward spiral like Cory Feldman. I don’t think SN has the power of pulling you up if you doAin’t this fun?! . A whole month to go and then we’ll scrutinize what actually happens till fall. I feel just like Cory Feldman at end of The ‘Burbs….(god I love this street”
Ben was viewed as a projecet. The only reason he contributed his first year was because both Maddox and Batch were injured.
Not saying Willis will be anything like Ben. But, Ben proves the flaw in your argument and highlights just how inexact of a science draft evaluation is.
Don’t go into a downward spiral like Cory Feldman. I don’t think SN has the power of pulling you up if you do
OK ... Willis is an undisputed top 3 QB in this draft. He's still a project. And no, the two draft classes are nowhere near comparable in terms of talent.ben was an undisputed top 3 QB in that draft.
4000 yards passing and almost 70 percent completion percentage to go with 30 some TDs in his last year of college. Not sure that they saw him as necessarily raw or a project. I realize he was from a small school maybe that brought slight concerns who knows. Perhaps their perception was every talented QB takes some time to get settled in. Seems that is how they initially approached it.OK ... Willis is an undisputed top 3 QB in this draft. He's still a project. And no, the two draft classes are nowhere near comparable in terms of talent.
And, I'm not saying Ben wasn't talented coming out. Just saying the small school background, coupled with where he was on the depth chart to begin the season, in addition to the way they had him as a game manager for the most part of his rookie year says to me they felt he was a bit of a project. He was raw for the NFL game.
No he isnt.OK ... Willis is an undisputed top 3 QB in this draft. He's still a project. And no, the two draft classes are nowhere near comparable in terms of talent.
And, I'm not saying Ben wasn't talented coming out. Just saying the small school background, coupled with where he was on the depth chart to begin the season, in addition to the way they had him as a game manager for the most part of his rookie year says to me they felt he was a bit of a project. He was raw for the NFL game.
Isn't what? One of the top 3 QBs in this draft?No he isnt.
Yes. Brilliant.I mean, you're entitled to your opinion ... And, I'll just leave it at that.
Some of the college QBs that may be availableWhat QBs would be available next year?
As of now it's a pretty steep drop after the top two.What QBs would be available next year?