• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

While I'm not specifically trying to be a dick here...

Uh, do you not understand that is because of a long, painful history of white supremacist ideology that has resulted in the deaths and enslavement of millions of people? If not I don't know what to say to you. I thought you were more reasonable than that.

Yeah no.

Western civilization built by white people is the most free and equal society in the history of the world. We don't exclude any ethnicity from participation but most other societies do as witnessed by the tribalism and internecine warfare throughout the rest of the world. You are drinking the neo-socialist coolaid.

Watch this video until you get it.

 
The notion that "white people bad, so racism towards whitey good" is somehow appropriate is just not valid. Seriously, racism and religious bigotry are rampant across the world - and whites are almost certainly the least likely to engage in it.


Exactly. Even the far left SPLC cites that Black Separatists hate groups are the biggest problem in the US. But no, let's not address this but rather shoe-horn white people into hate categories.


3PCS36T.jpg





As for actual hate crimes, Blacks make up 13% of the population (6% males) and I'll let these stats speak for themselves:


CsGfvI3.jpg
 
Exactly. Even the far left SPLC cites that Black Separatists hate groups are the biggest problem in the US.

Two points, scraps.

(1) Statistics are racist.

(2) The contemptible and vile SPLC may label you a racist for using statistics. If its leadership can find time away from "mistreatment, sexual harassment, gender discrimination and racism" and allow its leaders time off from their being “complicit in decades of racial discrimination, gender discrimination, and sexual harassment and/or assault.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/22/us/splc-richard-cohen-resigns.html

Yes, that ****** group that labels anything right of Mao as "hate speech" is a vile Petri dish of mistreatment, sexual harassment, discrimination and racism.

So **** them.
 
Facts = Today's hate speech


I hope Gavin McInnes sues them into oblivion in his lawsuit.
 
I know you probably hate whitey as well. I get it. To you color is an imagined construct. But in reality it is important. Why do you think blacks want to see black dolls? You should tell them to STFU because there is no race. Everyone sees color whether they admit it or not. If you have any black friends ask them about black identity and how they feel about black pride. I promise you if there was a chance of black people being destroyed you'd damn well hear about it and you'd probably agree it was a bad thing. You've been brainwashed into thinking that whites have no common interest and that we don't deserve to live. Sorry if I disagree.

Also your "mongrels" comment is just ignorant. If we were all mongrels we'd all be the same color. But we're not. Nobody has any issue of saying who is white when it suits them. Is Warren an Indian? Hell, no she's a white woman. And you have no issue say it. But now that we are talking about the destruction of the white race... well nobody is really white. It's just silly.

I was going to stay quite...until I read this...

Vader, your points are, IMO, very angry and I wish I could 'see it the way that you do', but you're not totally wrong in your views.

Not every black man/woman/boy/girl 'hates whitey'---that comment is absurd. Society has co-mingled and we're surviving with the 'rules' that have been setup for us. Yes, I believe in black pride. I believe every race should be proud of their heritage and where they have come from. IMO, what is wrong with providing a different view of the past? Example that you provided above - white Barbie is now black Barbie or yellow Barbie. That is how the all mighty dollar works - 'make things relevant' and increase sales.

OTB's statement on 'mongrels' is correct. Even the oldest families/races on the planet are no longer 'pure blooded'. And thus we're all mixed up and, I personally, don't see a problem with that.

This conversation could go on for days/years, but I do not think that there's a solution to your current angry views. Unless you want to segregate the populous again???
 
The royals were until Harry n' the little.... conceived. It's fun watching those people squirm.

I've always referred to myself as a "Heinz' - 57 varieties. Heinz supremacy, n'all. Condimentist.

Wrong. My family is directly related to the royals. Some here have heard the story---I'll give you the headline. Winston Churchill's (Spencer was his God-given last name) brother came to Bermuda and impregnated my mother's great grandmother (might be great-great). She was Native Indian. Her offspring has produced a multitude of mixed kids since the early 1900's...

The Royal family does not acknowledge us nor do we bother them.
 
Wasn't there an uproar in the black community about too many of their black men marrying white women? Isn't that the same thing you describe? So just to clarify, those black women that complained they are losing out to white women for black men are racist, correct? Can you find anything in the media describing those women as racist? I'm curious. I really am.

Jee-zus, the definition of "white supremacy" now includes Donald Trump as a white supremacist, and Ben Shapiro as a white supremacist. Ben Carson as well, for that matter.

The definition has diverged from reality. I believe that Nazis and white supremacists are a made-up boogeyman. A fiction. Minorities are more likely to get hit by lightning than suffer due to the actions of a Nazi or white supremacist. Further, the simple, undeniable fact is that blacks face vastly more danger from other blacks - by a factor of thousands - than they do from "white supremacists."

Finally, your apparent claims about the danger of "white supremacists" is stunningly overstated. The ADL defined hate crimes as broadly as humanly possible (at least as it pertains to crimes by white people, but I digress) and reported that 18 deaths in 2018 were due to "hate crimes" by whites.

18 murders, most of them Jewish citizens. 8 African-Americans murdered in "hate crimes." Horrible. But blacks are VASTLY more likely to die from drowning in an inflatable pool - nearly 900 in the years 1999-2010, or an average of more than 80 per year - than they are of dying at the hands of a "white supremacist."

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6319a2.htm

Number of deaths due to lightning strikes, 2002-2011, a span of ten years? 125, or about 12-13 people per year.

https://globalnews.ca/news/1546405/how-many-people-die-from-lightning-strikes-each-year/

Number of people who died because of texting while driving? "263 teens (age 15 to 19) were killed as a result of distracted driving in 2016."

https://www.edgarsnyder.com/car-accident/cause-of-accident/cell-phone/cell-phone-statistics.html

So inflatable wading pools are far more dangerous to African-Americans than "white supremacists." Getting struck by lightning is about an equal danger, and texting-while-driving vastly more likely to cause injury or death.

"White Supremacy" - a make-believe danger that acts as a convenient political tool.

This is utter chyt...I have been 'addressed' by white supremacist MULTIPLE TIMES in my 47 years. I have never been hit by lightning.

I won't say anymore on the topic.
 
I was going to stay quite...until I read this...

Vader, your points are, IMO, very angry and I wish I could 'see it the way that you do', but you're not totally wrong in your views.

Not every black man/woman/boy/girl 'hates whitey'---that comment is absurd. Society has co-mingled and we're surviving with the 'rules' that have been setup for us. Yes, I believe in black pride. I believe every race should be proud of their heritage and where they have come from. IMO, what is wrong with providing a different view of the past? Example that you provided above - white Barbie is now black Barbie or yellow Barbie. That is how the all mighty dollar works - 'make things relevant' and increase sales.

OTB's statement on 'mongrels' is correct. Even the oldest families/races on the planet are no longer 'pure blooded'. And thus we're all mixed up and, I personally, don't see a problem with that.

This conversation could go on for days/years, but I do not think that there's a solution to your current angry views. Unless you want to segregate the populous again???

First no her comments on mongrel's is not correct. I teach biology and have studied genetics for years. Also I never mentioned "pure" ONE TIME. So please understand what you are talking about before you jump into something.

Second, I never said all black people hate whitey. Again another strawman that you put up so you could knock down.

Third, I'm not angry... you angry?

Fourth, you basically agree with everything I said but you think I'm totally wrong based on your strawmen of things I never said.

Fifth, everyone should be proud of who they are regardless of race. The races are already segregated. Which is why 90% of churches in the U.S. have one race. Most schools are major one race. Most neighborhoods are basically one race. Again not all but most places aren't a mixing pot. Most are homogeneous. Hell my father is from NY. Go to NY and see how well they are mixed. China town, Little Italy ETC.... Also prisons are segregated. People split into races by nature.
 
Personally, I have no guilt, racially speaking. This is just a tool propagated by the left to create a victim class (fill in the blank).

I agree it may be more difficult for a minority to get ahead in life, because for many they're starting from the lower end of economic scale, but the opportunity is there.

I realize it's simplistic, but stay in school, work your *** off and you may be surprised what you achieve. There might even be a little less hate to go around.

Being proud of one's heritage is a personal choice, what ever floats your boat, and no one's business but your own. I just won't be playing the white guilt game.
 
First no her comments on mongrel's is not correct. I teach biology and have studied genetics for years. Also I never mentioned "pure" ONE TIME. So please understand what you are talking about before you jump into something.

Second, I never said all black people hate whitey. Again another strawman that you put up so you could knock down.

Third, I'm not angry... you angry?

Fourth, you basically agree with everything I said but you think I'm totally wrong based on your strawmen of things I never said.

Fifth, everyone should be proud of who they are regardless of race. The races are already segregated. Which is why 90% of churches in the U.S. have one race. Most schools are major one race. Most neighborhoods are basically one race. Again not all but most places aren't a mixing pot. Most are homogeneous. Hell my father is from NY. Go to NY and see how well they are mixed. China town, Little Italy ETC.... Also prisons are segregated. People split into races by nature.
Ok. Whatever. This is a losing topic.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Steeler Nation mobile app
 
I agree it may be more difficult for a minority to get ahead in life, because for many they're starting from the lower end of economic scale, but the opportunity is there.

You are 100% correct. Succeeding has much, much, MUCH more to do with economic standing than race, gender, religion, etc.

And the absolute, undeniable fact is that married couples earn a LOT more than unmarried parents. A LOT MORE - black, white, Asian, does not matter.

The problem is the rate of single-parent households in the United States, particularly among African-Americans. A white child in a single-parent household is MUCH more likely to drop out of school, struggle with poverty, use drugs, etc. than a child for a married African-American couple.

The issue is and has been for at least two generations, probably three, family structure, not race.
 
Last edited:
Wrong. My family is directly related to the royals. Some here have heard the story---I'll give you the headline. Winston Churchill's (Spencer was his God-given last name) brother came to Bermuda and impregnated my mother's great grandmother (might be great-great). She was Native Indian. Her offspring has produced a multitude of mixed kids since the early 1900's...

The Royal family does not acknowledge us nor do we bother them.

This...is bermuda's...finest hour.


 
Last edited:
Wrong. My family is directly related to the royals. Some here have heard the story---I'll give you the headline. Winston Churchill's (Spencer was his God-given last name) brother came to Bermuda and impregnated my mother's great grandmother (might be great-great). She was Native Indian. Her offspring has produced a multitude of mixed kids since the early 1900's...

The Royal family does not acknowledge us nor do we bother them.

That's pretty cool, Bermuda. So the queen will not give your family a place to stay on trips to England? A-holes.
 
Wrong. My family is directly related to the royals. Some here have heard the story---I'll give you the headline. Winston Churchill's (Spencer was his God-given last name) brother came to Bermuda and impregnated my mother's great grandmother (might be great-great). She was Native Indian. Her offspring has produced a multitude of mixed kids since the early 1900's...

The Royal family does not acknowledge us nor do we bother them.

Does this mean we now have to refer to you as Sir Bermuda?:wink:
 
The Brookings Institute did a study about poverty a few years back. They concluded that one has a 75% chance of lifting themselves out of poverty if they do 3 things:
Statistically proven.

1.Graduate highschool
2.Do not have kids out of wedlock.
3.Be able to hold a fulltime job.

https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/...teens-should-follow-to-join-the-middle-class/

And those three things are very easily doable by a majority of the population (if they have strong, committed parents, health, etc.). Its not rocket science but it does take commitment and lots of hard work.
 
Because there’s no way to know the final net impact of those 70 million abortions.

Are you high? Seriously.

For example, who is more likely to snag a husband and have three kids: A 25 year-old with no kids because she had an abortion nine years ago, or a 25 year-old with a eight-year old? So some of those women ended up +2 instead of -1.

Here's an interesting idea. It isn't a new idea. Hitler did it. Gaddafi did it. Putin lurched in that direction. Regardless of the specifics, the concept is the same - incent the peeps to procreate. Watch the population grow and flourish 'organically'. Yeah, modern minds (read: idiots) will pan such a notion as 'hitlerian', but in a modern society (read: a broad expanse of idiots), sometimes the obvious solution is the obvious solution.

Anyway, I like it. Fill Hungary with Hungarians. What a concept. Wonder if it's possible to fill America with Americans. Sounds xenophobic. What does 'xenophobic' actually mean anyway? I'd be curious to get Tibs' perspective... on Hungary.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019...0-lifetime-tax-exemption-having-lots-children
Hungary Offering $35,000, Lifetime Tax Exemption For Having Lots Of Children
by Tyler Durden | Sun, 07/28/2019 - 09:55

Faced with a declining birth rate and unwilling to fill population shortfalls with immigrants like some of its European neighbors, Hungary has rolled out a seven-point "Family Protection Action Plan" which showers boatloads of cash, loan assistance and tax breaks to couples who agree to crank out lots of Hungarian children.

For starters, the state is offering $35,000 to couples who get married and have at least three children. Specifically, women under 40 who are getting married for the first time will receive an interest-free, general-purpose loan of $35,000. Upon the birth of the couple's first and second children, loan payments will be suspended for three years each - with 1/3 of the principal paid off after the second child. After the third child is born, the debt will be wiped out.

Couples with two or more children can also use their loans for the purchase of an existing property - but it gets better.

"People living in villages should wait just a little bit longer," said Prime Minister Viktor Orbán in February. "Within a few weeks, we would like to announce a scheme specifically customised to their needs. This means that today young married couples agreeing to have two children are eligible for grants worth 22 million forints ($75,000 US) for starting their lives and creating their first homes, while families agreeing to have three children are eligible for grants worth 35 million forints ($120,000 US)," said Orbán in his February announcement.

Hungary will also help out with mortgages - picking up the tab on roughly $13,500 US after the couple's third child, with an additional $3,500 US of relief for each further child.

Moreover, women who have given birth to and raised four children will pay no income taxes for the rest of their lives, while grandparents who are still working are entitled to take leave to help take care of their new grandchildren.

There's even a $9,000 subsidy for the purchase of a seven-passenger vehicle. "If you’ve ever tried to fit three children with car seats and everything else you need for children and probably the dog too in a car, you know how hard it is," said Hungary's minister of state for family, youth and international affairs, Katalin Novák. "Cars in Europe also tend to be smaller than American cars"

As The Federalist's Emma Elliott Freire notes, "An unusual feature of the subsidies is that they go into effect while a child is still in the womb. Parents can claim the relevant subsidy for their baby as soon as an expectant mother reaches her second trimester of pregnancy."

"This is a philosophical aspect for us. We believe life begins at conception. We value unborn children, not only born children," according to Novák, who added: "Hungarian young people are very family friendly. They want to get married and have at least two children. If that’s a fact, then we have to help them."

Meanwhile, it looks like Orbán's existing measures to boost fertility have been working since he took office.

She also argues the government’s policies are already proving successful. “Fertility has increased by more than 20 percent since 2010 [when Orbán took office]. It hit an all-time low of 1.25 in 2010 and now it is at 1.49,” she says. This still falls far short of the fertility replacement rate of 2.1, but Novák believes all signs point in the right direction for the long term, particularly the marriage rate.

“Between 2002 and 2010, under the Socialist government, the current opposition party, marriages decreased by 23 percent. Since 2010, marriages have increased by 43 percent,” says Novák. She believes if marriage rates go up, more children will inevitably follow. Novák also points out that since 2010, divorces have decreased by 29 percent and abortion in Hungary has fallen to an all-time low. -The Federalist​

The catch?

In order to receive the benefits, women must remain married and employed.

"We link family support to work. You have to take part in the labor market. Unemployment is at 3.4 percent. We struggle more with a lack of labor force," according to Novák.

"We don’t want to change people. We want to make it possible for them to raise a family if they wish to," she added. "I have three children with my husband. I know that there comes a moment when you sit down and decide if you want to have another child. You discuss pros and cons. We want to put more arguments in the pros column. It’s up to you, but we want to make it easier to have a child or another child."
 
Great article about Hungary. The U.S. should not be subsidizing having babies while you're single and poor. Instead of replacing the American people we should be having more American children.
 
Great article about Hungary. The U.S. should not be subsidizing having babies while you're single and poor. Instead of replacing the American people we should be having more American children.

Freakin xenophobe!

Note that a condition of Hungary's compensation is that Mom is employed. Those Hungarians think things through!
 
Freakin xenophobe!

Note that a condition of Hungary's compensation is that Mom is employed. Those Hungarians think things through!

HAHA... yea, names mean almost nothing to me anymore. They are overused tripe spawned by brain dead pseudo intellectuals of modern sjw PC culture. Strange that people who are ok with destroying an entire race have the balls to call anyone else a xenophobe....
 
Top