when is the follow-the-science media going to go for the tie-breaker and push a microphone in front of DOCTOR Jill for her scientific opinion on this matter?
While it's not a great analogy, how many people now regret getting a tattoo that seemed like a great idea years ago.You can't drive a car or get into a R-rated movie until you are 18, but can have gender surgery that will affect the rest of the life? WOW!
Hit them with logic and their world collapses......
For some time now I've been saying the moment a few thousand people start saying emphatically and seriously that they identify as 67 and want to take their social security income, **** will hit the fan.I identify as upper middle age.
It was meant to show that something so important and permanent can be done at such young ages, but I get what you're saying.While it's not a great analogy, how many people now regret getting a tattoo that seemed like a great idea years ago.
These parents should have their parental rights severed as well endure forced sterilization to prevent the need to repeat the process again in the future.Levine wouldn't answer Rand Paul's question that she would allow children to have the surgery. A 8 y.o, 10 y.o.? That is unfathomable to me. The parents that OK it for their children at such a young age is also mindboggling. Some things are irreversible and people change. You can't drive a car or get into a R-rated movie until you are 18, but can have gender surgery that will affect the rest of the life? WOW!
It puts the lotion on the skin or it gets the hose agai.Guy wants to wear a dress in his house, pretend to be Queen Elizabeth? Don't give a ****.
Same guy wants to get paid my tax dollars while wearing the dress and pretending?
**** off.