• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

6th Mass Extinction Kicks Off

Let me explain chief. Developing countries want to have fun stuff like running water and electricity. For all that progress they'll likely look to the cheapest option. That would be coal and oil for the electricity. Since all that is bad and we want them to make Al Gore more money the cost difference will come from developed countries, such as us. The wealth of developed countries will be redistributed to developing countries. That is what wealth redistribution is. No tin foil hat. No only the oil barons will feel the sting. We will be forced to subsidize the world.
 
Let me explain chief. Developing countries want to have fun stuff like running water and electricity. For all that progress they'll likely look to the cheapest option. That would be coal and oil for the electricity. Since all that is bad and we want them to make Al Gore more money the cost difference will come from developed countries, such as us. The wealth of developed countries will be redistributed to developing countries. That is what wealth redistribution is. No tin foil hat. No only the oil barons will feel the sting. We will be forced to subsidize the world.

And I thought I was being condescending by explaining it to you at this level......I had no choice and still......

'the cost difference' of what? You mean using renewables instead of FF's? Economies of scale will take care of that, I explained that to you.

Try to glean some context from this:

NZZ De facto that is an expropriation from the countries that have the reserves. That will lead to a completely different developmental policy than has up till now been the case.

In principal the countries that have the oil will have to keep it in the ground because of market forces in play. The bridge between here(FF dependence) and there(renewable dominance) will include policy that restricts world bank loans,grants, etc. and other tactics to slow down FF infrastructure development in developing nations unless that money is used for renewables.

This is not a secret, it's out there for anyone to read including in Edenhofer's work.

Oh and nice use of 'chief' what Tonto sounds too racist for you?
 
Oh and nice use of 'chief' what Tonto sounds too racist for you?

Coming from the resident "tolerant" Left-wing Whackjob that says things like...
- asking someone if they are done ******* their sister,
- calling Conservatives Tea baggers - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_bag_(sexual_act)
- "He's a Rezzy Tom"
- "What a bunch of racist fascists these scumbags are, don't even get me started on jailbird Prick Perry"
- "Typical Reich Wing idiot"
- Calling Republican politicians terrorists - "So Ted [Cruz] a pseudo member of the 'American Taliban'"

...and countless more...I think Chief sort of pales, don't you?
 
Ed posts information showing that the guy who HEADS the IPCC has zero education in climate science, atmosphere, weather, or any related field. You dismiss Ed's point since the guy has a Ph.D. in a a field having nothing to do with "climate science."

Hmmmm ... that's interesting. So the lack of education in "climate science" means nothing if the person is otherwise well-educated? That's odd, since I recall a certain contemptible scumbag writing the following:









Oh, I GET IT!!

Pro-global fraud - any Ph.D. will do.

Anti-climate panic? You must have a Ph.D. in "climate science" - and no, education in statistics, mathematics, climate, weather or any related field will not do.

Polo, humiliating you is really too easy. And no, I don't need to include some asinine clown car video to make my point - I do so with reasoning and rational thought.

Oh, what the hell ... Polo the clown, in yet another beatdown:

IOjOx.gif

You should change your name to C4...cause you just disintegrated her. POOF! She gone!
 
but, if the shore line recedes, that would allow more opportunity for evolvement of species that currently may not have that opportunity, which in turn would provide a new level - or substitute - in the food chain.

shore line receding could also mean human deaths.

thus, wouldn't that be a win-win?
 
I like this line......

"The report says that anthropogenic (man-made) greenhouse gas emissions ......."

....apparently the know their audience.
 
but, if the shore line recedes, that would allow more opportunity for evolvement of species that currently may not have that opportunity, which in turn would provide a new level - or substitute - in the food chain.

shore line receding could also mean human deaths.

thus, wouldn't that be a win-win?

It will be for Ark and his new waterfront house!!
 
21STEELERS21;Kind of crazy to think 7 billion warm bodies and 100's of millions of cars could actually heat the earth.[/QUOTE said:
View attachment 518

WASHINGTON (WNB) - Secretary of State John Kerry displayed his theological prowess Wednesday at a ceremony to appoint Texas lawyer Shaarik Zafar as a special representative to Muslim communities.

"The Bible makes it clear that the United States has a responsibility to confront climate change. In the Book of Genesist Jesus clearly warns us to reduce greenhouse gases, especially in Muslim countries," intoned the somber Kerry.

Zafar's obvious unease during Kerry's comments was not surprising given the fact Muslims consider the Bible corrupt and find it offensive.

View attachment 519
 
No need to announce when your Mom leaves the computer on again. We understand.
 
http://www.weather.com/news/science/environment/greenhouse-gas-record-high-level-20140909

Kind of crazy to think 7 billion warm bodies and 100's of millions of cars could actually heat the earth.

Entirely crazy. If the entire population of the planet lived in one city the density of New York, the footprint would be roughly the equivalent of Texas. As prolific as the human imagination is, humankind does NOT have the capacity to alter the Earth's climate one iota. Climate is the province of the Lord.

"Climate change" is a proxy created to co-opt those educated beyond their intelligence as a disruption to the productive for the purpose of advancing marxism.

It should be instructive that the "president" views "climate change" as his chief boogyman, and that a significant number of the electorate follow him.
 
The real reasons conservatives deny the human impact on climate change are that you would also be admitting
God doesn't exist and Capitalism has its limits. With those two beliefs disproven, conservatism would no longer
exist.

So I respect your fight to postpone irrelevancy. But you can't postpone it forever.
 
The real reasons conservatives deny the human impact on climate change are that you would also be admitting
God doesn't exist and Capitalism has its limits. With those two beliefs disproven, conservatism would no longer
exist.

So I respect your fight to postpone irrelevancy. But you can't postpone it forever.

You have that exactly backwards. Y'all need "climate change" and other marxist ruses as your cover from God.

It isn't possible for humans to impact the climate. We occupy just over a tenth of a percent of the surface of the Earth. All of us. Evuh-freekin-body and their shadow. To suggest that humankind in its puniness could affect anything on this planet is tantamount to fearing the ant hill in your back yard. Except the ant hill is far more consequential.
 
The real reasons conservatives deny the human impact on climate change are that you would also be admitting God doesn't exist and Capitalism has its limits.

You really are too stupid for words. I often wonder if in fact you are simply Diamond Dave, posing as a moronic left-winger and posting idiotic drivel to increase the number of posts on the site, and thus the number of views.

Where to begin ... how about here?

  • Atmospheric concentrations of planet-warming greenhouse gases rocketed to a new record high in 2013, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) said in a news release Thursday that points to [the story actually leaves this blank, but we can safely assume that the article is blaming man-made emissions of CO2] as the biggest culprit behind the surge." Uhhh, okay ... then why the hell was 2013 not the hottest on record, nor even the hottest over the past century? Look at the graphs below. I realize that your ability to analyze words is astonishingly limited, so I gave you pictures.
  • Also, claims about AGW have absolutely, completely, and totally NOTHING to do with the existencwe of God. NOTHING. Or do you claim that the bible insists that there shall be no globla warming because Jesus promised cool temperatures??
  • Finally, you asslcown buttmonkey, your astonishing insight that "capitalism has its limits" is a statment of the obvious, having literally NOTHING to do with AGW. Also, perhaps your mom does not allow you enough time on her computer for you to learn that China - not a capitalist economy - will soon be the biggest emitter of CO2. Care to tackle this subject, you blithering moron?


monckton2-300x168.png


monckton3-300x168.png
 
The real reasons conservatives deny the human impact on climate change are that you would also be admitting
God doesn't exist and Capitalism has its limits. With those two beliefs disproven, conservatism would no longer
exist.

So I respect your fight to postpone irrelevancy. But you can't postpone it forever.

Exactly, in their subconscious it all ties together; God 'blesses America' and capitalism goes hand in hand with that blessing. So to slow down or even god forbid, stop resource exploitation (which is the lifeblood of capitalism) is a no no, especially when you tie that into the even stupider notion that 'god is in control' so we can do what we want.

You've seen the idiotic posts on here with stuff like ' nothing man can do could destroy the planet' No one told these schmucks that there are many nuclear weapons possessed by different countries that could do that in a matter of minutes?

It's delusion of the highest order.
 
You really are too stupid for words. I often wonder if in fact you are simply Diamond Dave, posing as a moronic left-winger and posting idiotic drivel to increase the number of posts on the site, and thus the number of views.

Where to begin ... how about here?

  • Atmospheric concentrations of planet-warming greenhouse gases rocketed to a new record high in 2013, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) said in a news release Thursday that points to [the story actually leaves this blank, but we can safely assume that the article is blaming man-made emissions of CO2] as the biggest culprit behind the surge." Uhhh, okay ... then why the hell was 2013 not the hottest on record, nor even the hottest over the past century? Look at the graphs below. I realize that your ability to analyze words is astonishingly limited, so I gave you pictures.
  • Also, claims about AGW have absolutely, completely, and totally NOTHING to do with the existencwe of God. NOTHING. Or do you claim that the bible insists that there shall be no globla warming because Jesus promised cool temperatures??
  • Finally, you asslcown buttmonkey, your astonishing insight that "capitalism has its limits" is a statment of the obvious, having literally NOTHING to do with AGW. Also, perhaps your mom does not allow you enough time on her computer for you to learn that China - not a capitalist economy - will soon be the biggest emitter of CO2. Care to tackle this subject, you blithering moron?


monckton2-300x168.png

No actually he makes perfect sense since he's answering Vinvent who posted this:

Entirely crazy. If the entire population of the planet lived in one city the density of New York, the footprint would be roughly the equivalent of Texas. As prolific as the human imagination is, humankind does NOT have the capacity to alter the Earth's climate one iota. Climate is the province of the Lord.

"Climate change" is a proxy created to co-opt those educated beyond their intelligence as a disruption to the productive for the purpose of advancing marxism.

It should be instructive that the "president" views "climate change" as his chief boogyman, and that a significant number of the electorate follow him.


That quote is what a moron sounds like.
 
Top