- Joined
- Apr 12, 2014
- Messages
- 6,982
- Reaction score
- 6,963
- Points
- 113
I think that federal judge should **** off. The evidence of election fraud in Ohio last election is palpable what with over 100 percent voter turnout in many Ohio counties and all.
All of Elfie's bullshit in one convenient thread
- Thread starter Elfiero
- Start date
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2014
- Messages
- 5,836
- Reaction score
- 4,780
- Points
- 113
It's widely known...even by Democrats......that Democrats employ voter fraud at every turn. They won't admit it of course, but they know full well. It's part of their strategy and it's been going on for years. It's been mostly ignored until now because they have been protected by just about every newspaper and news show in America. Now that the spotlight is finally on and pointing at them, they are trying to scatter like cockroaches that got caught in the cookie jar.
All of your bullshit is supposed to be posted in the same ****** thread.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 9,583
- Reaction score
- 5,866
- Points
- 113
When you've got these snowflakes on campus practically fainting from Trump graffiti it's going to be difficult to avoid intimidation charges.
So that it can get lost in the wash right?
Truly the party of freedom and courage...............
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 9,080
- Reaction score
- 11,816
- Points
- 113
Elfie,
Can you please post the actual order?
The above was about a guy in a court room with a judge, and that guy had an opinion. But was the order actually given?
Please post this order.
Kinda easy to separate the reality from the marketing in this example, huh?
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 9,080
- Reaction score
- 11,816
- Points
- 113
Elfie,
What does this mean:
What does this mean:
Elfie, we have a thread dedicated to your nonsensical bullshit. Please keep it in that thread.
thanks in advance
thanks in advance
Just like I said. I'm the only person who has his posts merged. Pop can post a million wacky threads and just because they lean to the right they are left alone.
I expose the phoniness that is CONservatism and this is what I get.
Trump was wrong. You can't "grab em by the p***y" because when you do this happens.
If it's nonsensical to you then I can tell you with 100% confidence that it's something lacking on your end.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 9,080
- Reaction score
- 11,816
- Points
- 113
Are you unable to answer my questions from above, Elfie?
You are special.
That's why I have him on Ignore.
Can you imagine if I asked the same of every reich wing poster and their posts from reich wing conspiracy blogs/sites?
How am I supposed to post the actual order? If you want a link to a story on the order being established fine. If you are like some of the conspiracy types on here who think the media never reports truth, then i can't help you.
Those types always find another layer to their imaginary onion. A rational person can never win.
Maybe you'll believe it if it favors your side since the order has been over ruled by a federal court.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cn...html?client=ms-android-americamovil-us&espv=1
If you like conspiracies.......the judges were appointed by Bush 41 and 43........
"We are stunned that a court would rule without even allowing one of the parties to file a memo explaining their case, but that is exactly what the 6th Circuit has done in this decision. We are exploring our options to reverse this unfortunate ruling," said Kirstin Alvanitakis, Communications Director, Ohio Democratic Party.
I don't know. That wasn't in the article I posted.
Did you just assume your own gender? How disgusting of you.
http://www.allenbwest.com/michellejesse/breaking-supreme-court-makes-emergency-ruling-election
They’ve even made a federal case of the matter — literally — filing an emergency request with the U.S. Supreme court. However, today, on the eve of the election, the U.S. Supreme Court denied Democrats’ request.
As the Washington Times reports:
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday denied an emergency request by the Ohio Democratic Party to reinstate a lower court’s order that sought to bar Republican presidential candidate*Donald Trump*and his supporters from intimidating voters at the polls.
The Real Voter Fraud.....Thanks to Repugnicans
The Real Voter Fraud
Keep telling me Repugnicans aren't racist S.N.
Calling them deplorables is far too kind.
Thought some of you would enjoy the part I highighted red.....you know since you like e-mails so much.
LEONHARDT
CHAPEL HILL, N.C. — The casting of a ballot is the most fundamentally American act that any of us takes. It connects us to the Enlightenment ideals of the country’s founding — the once-radical notion that human beings should think for themselves, rather than merely obey kings and priests. “Dare to know!” Immanuel Kant wrote, offering a motto for the Enlightenment. “Have the courage to use your own understanding!”
These ideals have a stirring power, even in a year as uninspiring as 2016. And their power makes it all the more outrageous that a significant number of Americans find their right of self-determination under attack.
Thousands of citizens have needed intervention from federal judges in the last several weeks in order to vote. Even more remarkably, a few million adult Americans will be denied the right to vote this year.
When you cast your ballot on Tuesday — and make sure that you do — or watch others go to the polls, I encourage you to keep in mind your disenfranchised fellow citizens.
In Ohio, residents who make a minor error filling out personal information will have their votes discarded. It already happened to Roland Gilbert, a legally blind retired lawyer who in 2014 put the date in the wrong place on his ballot, as Reuters reported. “Thousands of indisputably registered and eligible voters,” said Subodh Chandra, a lawyer suing the state, “are going to be disenfranchised solely because they made trivial, immaterial errors and omissions.”
In Texas, people have posted photographs to social media showing signs at polling places that claim voters need photo identification. They do not, thanks to a judge’s ruling, but the signs remain.
In Wisconsin, some state employees have made it difficult to obtain voter-identification cards, defying a court order. The same has happened here in North Carolina, with perfectly eligible voters receiving the runaround.
North Carolina has also closed polling places in some areas and changed early-voting hours. At a library in Charlotte on Saturday, the early-voting line stretched for hours. The changes have most likely contributed to the 9 percent decline — equaling 65,000 votes — in African-American early voting here, versus 2012. In Florida, which hasn’t had the same suppression, African-American voting is up.
Then there is the largest form of disenfranchisement: the combination of the imprisonment boom and state laws barring former prisoners from voting. As a result, 6.1 million Americans, and one in every 13 African-Americans, lack the ballot.
The stated rationale for making voting harder — fears of widespread voter fraud — has been thoroughly debunked. Only a minuscule number of people vote illegally. When they do, as with an Iowa woman who apparently voted twice for Donald Trump last month, they are often caught.
In reality, the suppression efforts are just a campaign tactic, by Republicans trying to prevent heavily Democratic-leaning groups — racial minorities and younger adults — from voting.
]In North Carolina, a local party chairman emailed election officials to remind them that limited early voting was “in the best interest of the Republican Party.” In Green Bay, Wis., the Republican city clerk declined to put a polling place on a university campus because “students lean more toward the Democrats,” according to an email uncovered by Ari Berman, author of “Give Us the Ballot.”
Fortunately, the evidence suggests the tactic alters the outcome only in the very closest elections. (Not all of the disenfranchised end up voting for Democrats.) But no one should take much comfort from this. For one thing, some elections — potentially, this year’s races for president, governor and senator in North Carolina — are extremely close. And results aside, are we actually fighting over whether Americans have the right to vote?
Come Wednesday morning, the country will probably have avoided electing a dangerous authoritarian president. But this campaign’s demoralizing slog will still leave us in need of a program of national recovery. Restoring the right of universal suffrage should be part of that recovery.
Congress could set minimum standards for each state — requiring automatic voter registration, for example. I realize that most congressional Republicans now have little interest in voting rights. But I’d urge them to consider their party’s long-term interests: Opposing basic rights for large and growing groups is not so smart.
If Congress won’t act, the Supreme Court can. The court can acknowledge that its 2013 dismantling of a key part of the Voting Rights Act hinged on an overly rosy view of the aftermath. The Equal Protection Clause offers one solution, as the scholar Richard Hasen has argued: The justices could interpret it to overturn state laws making it harder to register and vote.
The Enlightenment ideas of our country’s founding have turned out to be pretty wise ones. Governments derive “their just powers from the consent of the governed,” as the Declaration of Independence says, and all Americans have “certain unalienable rights.” Voting, surely, is one of them.
The Real Voter Fraud
Keep telling me Repugnicans aren't racist S.N.
Calling them deplorables is far too kind.
Thought some of you would enjoy the part I highighted red.....you know since you like e-mails so much.
LEONHARDT
CHAPEL HILL, N.C. — The casting of a ballot is the most fundamentally American act that any of us takes. It connects us to the Enlightenment ideals of the country’s founding — the once-radical notion that human beings should think for themselves, rather than merely obey kings and priests. “Dare to know!” Immanuel Kant wrote, offering a motto for the Enlightenment. “Have the courage to use your own understanding!”
These ideals have a stirring power, even in a year as uninspiring as 2016. And their power makes it all the more outrageous that a significant number of Americans find their right of self-determination under attack.
Thousands of citizens have needed intervention from federal judges in the last several weeks in order to vote. Even more remarkably, a few million adult Americans will be denied the right to vote this year.
When you cast your ballot on Tuesday — and make sure that you do — or watch others go to the polls, I encourage you to keep in mind your disenfranchised fellow citizens.
In Ohio, residents who make a minor error filling out personal information will have their votes discarded. It already happened to Roland Gilbert, a legally blind retired lawyer who in 2014 put the date in the wrong place on his ballot, as Reuters reported. “Thousands of indisputably registered and eligible voters,” said Subodh Chandra, a lawyer suing the state, “are going to be disenfranchised solely because they made trivial, immaterial errors and omissions.”
In Texas, people have posted photographs to social media showing signs at polling places that claim voters need photo identification. They do not, thanks to a judge’s ruling, but the signs remain.
In Wisconsin, some state employees have made it difficult to obtain voter-identification cards, defying a court order. The same has happened here in North Carolina, with perfectly eligible voters receiving the runaround.
North Carolina has also closed polling places in some areas and changed early-voting hours. At a library in Charlotte on Saturday, the early-voting line stretched for hours. The changes have most likely contributed to the 9 percent decline — equaling 65,000 votes — in African-American early voting here, versus 2012. In Florida, which hasn’t had the same suppression, African-American voting is up.
Then there is the largest form of disenfranchisement: the combination of the imprisonment boom and state laws barring former prisoners from voting. As a result, 6.1 million Americans, and one in every 13 African-Americans, lack the ballot.
The stated rationale for making voting harder — fears of widespread voter fraud — has been thoroughly debunked. Only a minuscule number of people vote illegally. When they do, as with an Iowa woman who apparently voted twice for Donald Trump last month, they are often caught.
In reality, the suppression efforts are just a campaign tactic, by Republicans trying to prevent heavily Democratic-leaning groups — racial minorities and younger adults — from voting.
]In North Carolina, a local party chairman emailed election officials to remind them that limited early voting was “in the best interest of the Republican Party.” In Green Bay, Wis., the Republican city clerk declined to put a polling place on a university campus because “students lean more toward the Democrats,” according to an email uncovered by Ari Berman, author of “Give Us the Ballot.”
Fortunately, the evidence suggests the tactic alters the outcome only in the very closest elections. (Not all of the disenfranchised end up voting for Democrats.) But no one should take much comfort from this. For one thing, some elections — potentially, this year’s races for president, governor and senator in North Carolina — are extremely close. And results aside, are we actually fighting over whether Americans have the right to vote?
Come Wednesday morning, the country will probably have avoided electing a dangerous authoritarian president. But this campaign’s demoralizing slog will still leave us in need of a program of national recovery. Restoring the right of universal suffrage should be part of that recovery.
Congress could set minimum standards for each state — requiring automatic voter registration, for example. I realize that most congressional Republicans now have little interest in voting rights. But I’d urge them to consider their party’s long-term interests: Opposing basic rights for large and growing groups is not so smart.
If Congress won’t act, the Supreme Court can. The court can acknowledge that its 2013 dismantling of a key part of the Voting Rights Act hinged on an overly rosy view of the aftermath. The Equal Protection Clause offers one solution, as the scholar Richard Hasen has argued: The justices could interpret it to overturn state laws making it harder to register and vote.
The Enlightenment ideas of our country’s founding have turned out to be pretty wise ones. Governments derive “their just powers from the consent of the governed,” as the Declaration of Independence says, and all Americans have “certain unalienable rights.” Voting, surely, is one of them.
Last edited:
Okay Somewhere in all this there must be something about being racist.
Plenty unless you're blind, or I should say willfully blind.
elfie the writer doesn't know ****...in Texas you DO need ID....that is the law....the court order has not supplanted the will of the people here yet. The only reason not to show ID is to try and cheat....
here are the Texas requirements
here are the Texas requirements
Last edited:
no, please point out what specifically you think in that article is indicating racism on the part of the Republicans
And as the article states the idea of voter fraud has been thoroughly debunked. The only reason to ask for ID is to keep someone who can't afford all the documents to get an Id because of current financial hardship from voting.
And thanks for merging my thread again.
Like frightened children.
Everything is racist to the Elftard.
Similar threads
