I am not on Facebook. Why would anyone get their news there? Isn't that like getting your news from late night comedy shows?
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Steeler Nation mobile app
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Steeler Nation mobile app
No I'm speaking of some of the content that was posted to this board over the past year and a half that may have - inadvertantly - come from these Russian fake news plants. Since these were overwhelmingly anti-Hillary and pro-Trump in nature, they were widely disseminated on various right wing blogs, news sites, twitter and FB feeds and eventually passed on by the pro-Trump faction here on the board.
The Fake Americans Russia Created to Influence the Election
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/07/us/politics/russia-facebook-twitter-election.html
Russia hired 1,000 people to create anti-Clinton 'fake news' in key US states during election, Trump-Russia hearings leader reveals
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...k-warner-intelligence-committee-a7657641.html
How Russian Twitter Bots Pumped Out Fake News During The 2016 Election
http://www.npr.org/sections/alltech...pumped-out-fake-news-during-the-2016-election
I am not on Facebook. Why would anyone get their news there? Isn't that like getting your news from late night comedy shows?
How is a comedian mocking news you’ve already heard anything like fabricated “news” you are hearing for the first time?
The people aren’t the low hanging fruit, the crimes are. And the crimes are now leverage for Mueller. If Manafort wants to avoid the clink, he can give Trump up.
I didn't vote for Hillary Clinton because she is Hillary Clinton. I don't know why liberals can't understand that.
I understand I'll be ridiculed for it, but here is my take. Strictly my opinion based on what's gone down over the past year or so.
From what I can tell, Trump's business dealings over the decades have involved numerous dark money sources, be they Russian or others. Since he was shut off from financing from US banks, he had to find money elsewhere. This network of illicit money and illegal business dealings created numerous contacts and relationships, some of which included entities close to Putin. These are the skeletons in his closet. There are probably a handful of deals that, if exposed, would allow authorities to charge him for money laundering and tax evasion, among other charges. Out of this background he rose to become the GOP nominee.
Putin was eager to have a more Russian-friendly administration in the WH, one that would look the other way when it came to Ukraine, Syria and Russia exerting its influence in Eastern Europe and elsewhere. In general, a weaker US - with as much internal turmoil as possible - and a weaker NATO in particular were the desired result. The Richard Steele dossier - some of it already collaborated - shows the Russians collected dirt on Trump during his visit to Moscow, plus the info on his ties to Russian dark money, mobsters and the like. The key player here is a dude named Felix Sater, who was Trump's partner in investment deals.
Through various channels, they put in motion a two-prong effort to do what they could to help get Trump elected. The Russians created massive amounts of falsified, misleading content and flooded the net with it. They hacked the DNC emails then published them through wikileaks, undermining Hillary Clinton's candidacy. All this with the understanding Trump would stay out of Putin's hair if and when he got elected, otherwise they'd reveal the blackmail info.
Behind in the polls, Trump and his advisors may have been desperate enough to seek out this help being offered, though they tried to do this through intermediaries to keep their noses clean. The myriad of Trump advisors with clear connections to Russia and Russian interests like Manafort, Gates, Paige, Flynn, Papadopoulos,Tillerson, Sessions and Stone are omnious. The fact Trump fired Comey, in the middle of an FBI investigation into Trump and his campaign just added another layer to possible criminal wrongdoing.
So my view is this wasn't some massive conspiracy that Trump was the mastermind of. He didn't come up with the blueprint. He simply knew about it, and went along with it. Then began denying any of it happened, and thus came the invention of the term 'fake news' that dominated the election cycle.
Ironically enough, he very well could have been elected president without all this horseshit, by folks like many here on this board, who simply wanted to see change in Washington and voted for him.
Unfortunately, wishing all this away does not clear Trump from any wrongdoing, only Mueller's investigation can do that at this point.
Some info on Trump-Russian ties:
https://www.politico.com/magazine/s...ies-chart-flynn-page-manafort-sessions-214868
That has nothing to do with anything. The question is did a hostile foreign government interfere in our elections and did either of the presidential campaigns knowingly participate in - or even passively accept - that interference? I don't know why non-liberals can't understand that.
That has nothing to do with anything. The question is did a hostile foreign government interfere in our elections and did either of the presidential campaigns knowingly participate in - or even passively accept - that interference? I don't know why non-liberals can't understand that.
edit - and to delzjc's earlier point, yes Mueller has broad powers to investigate any and all crimes he may uncover in the process, even if they're unrelated, or just tangibly related to the initial scope of the inquiry. A crime is a crime, afterall. It's his sworn duty to folllw the leads wherever they may take him. Like it or not.
I wrote pretty clearly at the top of my post this is entirely my opinion. Not sure how I could be any clearer than that. And it's not 'wild speculation based on nothing factual,' it's speculation based on reading a lot and doing my own research on the matter....everything you've written here is just wild speculation based on nothing factual.
That's a bit dramatic. I sold my soul because I want the truth to come out so we can put this behind us, even if it includes Mueller exonerating Trump? Or maybe I sold my soul because I have differing political views than you do? Strange comment, regardless.It's obvious you've sold your soul.
In my short life, I have voted for Clinton, Clinton, Bush, Bush, Obama, Romney and Trump. Who is the last Republican you voted for Tibs?
I wrote pretty clearly at the top of my post this is entirely my opinion. Not sure how I could be any clearer than that. And it's not 'wild speculation based on nothing factual,' it's speculation based on reading a lot and doing my own research on the matter.
You really should read up on things. I can't do your homework for you. Plenty of info out there regarding Trump's murky business deals and connections. If you don't want to read it, then don't. If it suits you just keep telling yourself I'm pulling it out of thin air.Trump involved in "dark money", tax fraud, money laundering isn't wild speculation? What information do you have on which to base that opinion?
Jesus lady, it's not my job to produce evidence here or elsewhere. That's above my pay grade.Wild speculation is exactly what it is, and until you produce one shred of evidence it will remain so.
You mean by Elfie? Yes, I ignore all of them. Except for occasionally arguing their absurdity for fun.
We are a nation of laws. President Donald Trump and all those around him who have not yet been named in an indictment have the presumption of innocence. As do those who have been arrested and not plead guilty. But what has unfolded today is the working of a very meticulous and seasoned prosecutor who is sending an unambiguous message. This is real. And a lot more is out there. The shockwaves coursing through Washington and the world are only beginning.
Make no mistake, Bob Mueller almost assuredly knows a lot more than he has let on. He also knows how to unfold a prosecution, to turn up the heat, send shots across bows, and build a case up the ladder. The fact that he started with such big names is telling. The hints at other knowledge, and other people, in the indictment is a serious clue that many more shoes are likely to drop. The plea deal that was off the radar suggests there are names and actions that the public has yet to give scrutiny, but the Mueller team has been hard at work ferreting out. And the president reportedly fumes about a narrative he cannot control.
In Watergate, there was a growing sense of pressure. But the crime itself was rather contained. Here the crimes are allegedly widespread and strike at the very heart of our democratic institutions. There is a strong suggestion that there were active agents for the Russian government working inside the highest echelons of the Trump campaign. Let that sink in for a moment.
One thing to keep in mind is that the best prosecutors, a distinction with which Mueller is often credited, have a sense of timing and drama. But it is not only for public consumption. It is to uncover the deepest crimes committed and to bring those who perpetrated those crimes to justice.
Will Manafort flip? Will others? Who else does he have goods on? Are there other witnesses or people of interest cooperating? Somewhere in the bowels of Mueller's offices, his team are putting these pieces together.
This is likely but the first act of a play unlike any seen before in our nation's history.
https://www.facebook.com/theDanRath...q7EQU55OhdUYfXmSjyULrzjfSdF-mo5ufarmY&fref=nf
You really should read up on things. I can't do your homework for you. Plenty of info out there regarding Trump's murky business deals and connections. If you don't want to read it, then don't. If it suits you just keep telling yourself I'm pulling it out of thin air.
Jesus lady, it's not my job to produce evidence here or elsewhere. That's above my pay grade.
So you're lazy and perfectly fine with being led by your nose. Just be in line with popular opinion around here and keep your neck above water. Got it.So you've got nothing.
Trump involved in "dark money", tax fraud, money laundering isn't wild speculation? What information do you have on which to base that opinion? You really think the IRS hasn't been crawling up his *** for the last 30 years? He's been at some points probably the most famous wealthy businessman in the country. You really think someone involved in tax fraud and money laundering would open themselves up the intense financial scrutiny of being a presidential candidate? For what?
Wild speculation is exactly what it is, and until you produce one shred of evidence it will remain so.
So you're lazy and perfectly fine with being led by your nose. Just be in line with popular opinion around here and keep your neck above water. Got it.
So you're lazy and perfectly fine with being led by your nose. Just be in line with popular opinion around here and keep your neck above water. Got it.
So you're lazy and perfectly fine with being led by your nose. Just be in line with popular opinion around here and keep your neck above water. Got it.