- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 9,394
- Reaction score
- 6,217
- Points
- 113
To be sure, it is clear that Elfie is the weak link.
And Ben has had dog games where he has been the principal reason for the team's poor showing (Baltimore, Philly, KC). So Elfie is not wrong here.
But that is a rarity.
While I am loathe to agree that Elfie has a good point, he does in this instance, even if the verbiage seems off, to me.
I think rather than the title saying 'weak link' or 'weak link at this point', we've mentioned several times that Ben is the straw that stirs the drink. While sometimes that seems to have been migrated to Bell, IMO, it still applies to Ben. Ben has a bad game (for whatever reason), it is an ugly day for the team.
In the past few years, we haven't seen a D on the field that could stop the other team from scoring. In 10 of their regular season games, the Chiefs scored 21 or more points. In the two games vs the Steelers they scored 14 and 16. They only scored less points vs Houston in game 2. While the D has gotten better over the last part of the season, allowing 14 early in the season seems to be an anomaly versus such a good offense. I don't recall if they were hindered at that time, though.
In any event, if the D can continue playing well, we can hang on to win games even if Ben isn't playing well. For the offense, we haven't scored less than 24 since week 9 versus the Ravens. We scored 16 vs the *'s with landry jones, although I don't remember if any of that was in garbage time. The *'s averaged a 27.6 ppg during the regular season. We allowed then 27 with a lesser D. I'm told in previous threads that the *'s could have just scored more if needed, though.....