How'd those polls work out for you last election? Pole smoker...
Meaningless numbers. In actuality Republicans right now are poised to gain 1 to 3 seats in the Senate and a close hold of the House looking at real polls using real people in real places.
It should be more than that. There are 10 Dem Senate seats up for election in states that Trump won.
Indy, if the Republicans hold the house and gain in the Senate, that would be a monumental feat. In nearly every midterm election, the party holding the Presidency loses midterm seats - as many as 63 by the Dems as recently as 2010, Bammy's first mid-term election.
In 2006, Republicans lost 31 House seats and 6 Senate seats. In 1994, the Democrats lost 54 seats in the House and 9 in the Senate.
The only recent midterm election where the party holding the Executive branch did well was 2002, but that result was triggered more by 9/11 than anything else.
If in fact, the Republicans maintain the House and add to the Senate, that would be a remarkable rebuke of the (D)umbass party.
Bring on Grey Beaver!
Dems mull whether Warren is the one to take on Trump
Can Elizabeth Warren win back blue-collar Democrats from President Trump in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania?
It’s a question many Democrats are pondering as Warren — one of the leading contenders for her party’s presidential nomination, if she chooses to run in 2020 — goes back and forth with the president over immigration and other issues.
Warren (D-Mass.) has shown an ability to rally and excite progressives, she’s a proven fundraiser and she has policy bona fides from her work in the Senate. Yet there are creeping doubts among some Democrats that she’s the best candidate to take on Trump.
Some worry the former Harvard professor will have a tough time winning back the Rust Belt centrists and independents who abandoned Hillary Clinton and Democrats for Trump.
“I just can’t see a blue-collar, Rust Belt guy voting for her,” said one Democratic strategist who has worked on presidential campaigns. “I think the party needs to be realistic about that.”
Some Democrats almost certainly remain shellshocked from the last election after Trump’s surprise win. He became the first Republican to win the states of Pennsylvania and Michigan in a presidential election since 1988 and the first Republican to win Wisconsin since President Reagan in 1984.
If Democrats don’t retake those states in 2020, their chances of winning the Electoral College will fall.
Teeth-gnashing over who is best-positioned to take on Trump, as a result, is already taking place ahead of the midterm elections.
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/396204-dems-mull-whether-warren-is-the-one-to-take-on-trump
Agreed, but the Dems are very vulnerable right now because they are so batshit out of their minds.
True, but another way of looking at is that democRATS don't become bat **** out of their minds...those that are bat **** out of their minds become democRATS.
Indy, if the Republicans hold the house and gain in the Senate, that would be a monumental feat. In nearly every midterm election, the party holding the Presidency loses midterm seats - as many as 63 by the Dems as recently as 2010, Bammy's first mid-term election.
In 2006, Republicans lost 31 House seats and 6 Senate seats. In 1994, the Democrats lost 54 seats in the House and 9 in the Senate.
The only recent midterm election where the party holding the Executive branch did well was 2002, but that result was triggered more by 9/11 than anything else.
If in fact, the Republicans maintain the House and add to the Senate, that would be a remarkable rebuke of the (D)umbass party.
Bring on Grey Beaver!
Dems mull whether Warren is the one to take on Trump
Can Elizabeth Warren win back blue-collar Democrats from President Trump in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania?
It’s a question many Democrats are pondering as Warren — one of the leading contenders for her party’s presidential nomination, if she chooses to run in 2020 — goes back and forth with the president over immigration and other issues.
Warren (D-Mass.) has shown an ability to rally and excite progressives, she’s a proven fundraiser and she has policy bona fides from her work in the Senate. Yet there are creeping doubts among some Democrats that she’s the best candidate to take on Trump.
Some worry the former Harvard professor will have a tough time winning back the Rust Belt centrists and independents who abandoned Hillary Clinton and Democrats for Trump.
“I just can’t see a blue-collar, Rust Belt guy voting for her,” said one Democratic strategist who has worked on presidential campaigns. “I think the party needs to be realistic about that.”
Some Democrats almost certainly remain shellshocked from the last election after Trump’s surprise win. He became the first Republican to win the states of Pennsylvania and Michigan in a presidential election since 1988 and the first Republican to win Wisconsin since President Reagan in 1984.
If Democrats don’t retake those states in 2020, their chances of winning the Electoral College will fall.
Teeth-gnashing over who is best-positioned to take on Trump, as a result, is already taking place ahead of the midterm elections.
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/396204-dems-mull-whether-warren-is-the-one-to-take-on-trump
The Dem nominee in 2020 will be someone nobody is even talking about currently.
These tariffs have the stock market wobbling. There still could be a negative event that takes place that really effects the midterms.
Um, the market over the last 2 days is up about 400 points, and inching towards 25,000 again.
Granted, there are always market swings, but wobbling is not a term I would use at the moment.
Tariffs took effect recently, and the market responded in a positive way.
Bring on Grey Beaver!
Dems mull whether Warren is the one to take on Trump
Can Elizabeth Warren win back blue-collar Democrats from President Trump in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania?
Historically markets crash in October. I'm not predicting that is going to happen, but Trump seems to be playing with fire.
Also gas prices and inflation are heading up, gas could be around 3.50 some places before mid-terms. Higher gas prices
tend to make people feel grouchy.
Historically markets crash in October. I'm not predicting that is going to happen, but Trump seems to be playing with fire.
Also gas prices and inflation are heading up, gas could be around 3.50 some places before mid-terms. Higher gas prices
tend to make people feel grouchy.
STRAWWW ALLLLLMOOOOOSTTT
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/b...bya-prepares-to-resume-oil-exports-2018-07-11
Oil is down and gas prices will be down a lot after they stop the summer blend well before Nov.
There's a little knee-jerk dip this morning because of the new slap on China that was just announced, but it should correct and continue to improve.
Tidy up your safe spaces, libtards. It’s going to be a long and painful 6 years for you.
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/07/20/rnc-surpasses-dnc-again-in-fundraising-under-chair-ronna-mcdaniel/