So going forward, if you are being arrested and say that you can't breathe, will the cops have to let you go on your way?
So going forward, if you are being arrested and say that you can't breathe, will the cops have to let you go on your way?
Oh I agree the cop used excessive force. I don't doubt that at all. But we aren't privy to everything the grand jury is, either. I was surprised that there was not an indictment in this case, honestly.
I was telling my daughter the same thing last night. Just listen to the police, do what they say, and you won't end up in a situation like this.
. Telling kids that- "well, just listen to the cops and everything will be fine", does them a disservice and skips over a much larger issue. .
I wasn't replying to you specifically. I was just posing a hypothetical question.
Care to explain that?
I don't know how anyone would think its alright to not do what a cop tells you to do. Resisting arrest is resisting arrest.
I don't know what your nephew is like, bigapple and I would assume he is a good kid. Saying that, if he is not breaking the law and mindling his own business and still is harassed by police, then that certainly is a problem. Racial profiling is an ugly situation that happens a lot. Maybe its training or experience. Telling someone to disobey authority is dangerous advice.
This cop obviously used excessive force. This guy, other than verbally resisting, was only accused of some petty crime. Did he really need to be taken down like this?
The question is, all perps resist arrest to a certain point. At what point do you use force, and how much is appropriate? Will we now get to a point where our cops will be afraid to use any force, for fear of possible criminal prosecution? We have emasculated our teachers from punishing disruptive students. Is this the next step in the breakdown of our society?
Good point.
Tried to Rep the post but the stupid karma police stopped me; hamster makes an incredibly important point.
The police need to act within policy. The police cannot use excessive force. However, the undeniable fact is this: the criminals have no limit on their behavior. At a certain point, the police are very measured, cautious and slower to react. That works most of the time, and with most bad guys.
But there are ****-ton of armed and violent criminals in larger cities. If the police doubt their ability to get into confrontations due to the potential for prosecution, they are much more likely - indeed, even encouraged one might say - to simply say, "@#$% it" and walk away. Fewer will want to be police officers, particularly where a confrontation carries with it the possibility of prosecution.
Finding the right balance is becoming more difficult, where what appears to be justifiable use of force (Ferguson cop) is treated the same in public opinion as something that appears to be excessive use of force (the NYPD).
Telling kids that- "well, just listen to the cops and everything will be fine", does them a disservice and skips over a much larger issue.
Sure. It completely absolves any role that race may have played on this situation. It implies that there are no social prejudices not only in law enforcement, but also in some of our social structures.
When the kid grows up to be an adult, they will draw from those shallow lessons. When someone's rights are being infringed upon- they will simply associate "well, that person probably had it coming". Because that is what they were taught.
Hell- even if you dont want discuss race- you can at least explain to them why exactly this was a tragedy and what the cop did was wrong.
What I do advocate is that you do not resist the police during any confrontation or interaction. It will always end badly for the person involved. Any perception of any wrong (rightly or not) on the part of the police should always be dealt with afterward.
Big man's widow just on tv saying the cop is still getting paid, still feeding his family and wondering who's going to feed her family. I'm guessing the same people that have always fed them....us.
They said the man's got six kids. I doubt he can support them, living in NYC, selling one cigarette at a time. The math is quite clear.
That's crazy talk. You are not down with the struggle.
Cig prices here in NYC are quite crazy. $14 for a pack. That comes out to $0.70 per death stick.
Lets say he is an enterprising man and charges markup- Lets say $1.50 for 1, $2 for 2. It wouldnt be difficult for him to get an avg. of 5-10 customers every hour, and earn close to $15/hour. Needless to say, he would make more selling loosies than he would flipping burgers
So what was the illegality? I'm confused. If he pays $14.00/pack retail, the Gov't has already gotten their cut. What is the difference between this guy selling these individual smokes, versus a kid with a lemonade stand?
So what was the illegality? I'm confused. If he pays $14.00/pack retail, the Gov't has already gotten their cut.