Dumbass. You're posting the same article I did prior. The actual report itself from the ACS that led to the nationwide reporting.
This is what led you down your latest rabbit hole:
View attachment 12124
Question: Why the spike?
Dumbass: There is one and ONLY one reason, POPULATION AGING.
SMDH. Here is their literal quote.
This trend is largely affected by the aging and growth of the population and by a rise in diagnoses of 6 of the 10 most common cancers—breast, prostate, endometrial, pancreatic, kidney, and melanoma. (The other 4 top 10 cancers are lung, colon and rectum, bladder, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.)
It is NOT only due to an aging population.
You should have done your homework and read the rest of the article as it talked to a multitude of contributors to the rises in cancer. Including noting that cancer incidence is DROPPING among the elderly and RISING among the young. Which you've argued simply isn't happening either.
View attachment 12122
Yah, because that's the frozen pole you two got your tongues stuck to. I posted the news. OVERALL cancer incidence are rising and it's ALARMING. You two did go full myopic on just the young.
Dumbass, 50-64 year olds were included from post 1 of the argument as being in the "young", as per the article...the source of the entire damned discussion.
See the damned image from the original ACS report above. Under the heading
CANCER PATIENTS ARE GETTING YOUNGER, people aged 50-64 are included.
You remain this stupid.