Jesus, you are one simple, daft son of a *****. That "fact check" (which is now wrong) was published in 2022.
Besides being 2 years old, you didn't bother to even read it. Reuters "fact checked" it by asking....[drum roll]...Pfizer what they thought.
"Nine pages of adverse event reports from Pfizer-BioNTech in relation to its COVID-19 vaccine are not confirmed adverse events to the shot.
They “may not have any causal relationship” to each other, the pharmaceutical company has told Reuters."
God damn. I mean, that's just like having the DOJ investigate the DOJ for corruption. "Nope, we didn't find a thing. Everything's good within."
Yeah, nothing to see here.
Again, from your absolute gem of a "fact check" - "Examples of such events are difficult breathing, déjà vu and myocardial infarction,
as well as 1,223 events with a fatal outcome"
Further - "The document was submitted by Pfizer as part of its Biological License Application (BLA) to the United States Federal Drug Administration (FDA)"
So Pfizer sends a BLA to the FDA listing 9 pages and thousands of AEs to the Government. Floggy says "they were lying, there's no proof so therefore the drugs don't do no harm no how."
Son. SMH.
No need to. It's in the link you provided, in an included link, submitted by Pfizer itself from Pfizer's own studies. No definition needed.
Now define rare.
No. Because at the time, we took adverse events seriously and took action to remove drugs from the market that were dangerous.
Now? Well the Pharmas line the pockets of politicians and the incest between their boards and the Government are well documented. So...we don't pull cash cow drugs off the market. Money is now more important than lives.