Covid Vaccine

[Hypocycloids]

OK, this should be good…

Why do some states have helmet laws? Why does the NFL, NHL, and MLB have them? So they can infringe upon players rights?

Yes maybe to some being forced to wear a helmet does infringe on their rights, but at least they'll find comfort knowing they won't suffer from adverse side effects.

 

[Troglodyte]

cool almost flex



but how often are states being sued by those who suffer disabilities from a motorcycle crash? is it "very few"? its likely extremely miniscule. people know the risks they take riding without a helmet - and its their own decision not to.

you're the reason hair curlers have stickers on them that warn of putting them inside your anus. your whole argument was dumb as ****, then got dumber and deep dived into stupid before losing chromosomes and coming up for air in the middle of retard swamp.

So while you haven’t suffered a motorcycle related head injury, you found out the hard way about not stuffing a hair curler in your anus. Jeesh!

 

[Confluence]

You’re even more clueless than I thought. **** sandwich time…

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8861143/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478733/

Recent data you obsequious fuucktard

The second "study" demonstrates your lack of reading comprehension; the data from Supe's post above show 51 deaths from TTB in the UK alone. The **** "study" you linked clearly used poor data (why Flogtard, why would they use **** data??)

 

[Superman]

So while you haven’t suffered a motorcycle related head injury, you found out the hard way about not stuffing a hair curler in your anus. Jeesh!

just when we start to believe your ignorance has dried up, someone pisses down the well.

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

Let’s just say a lot less rare than with Covid infection. Right?

Define rare.

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

You’re even more clueless than I thought. **** sandwich time…

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8861143/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10478733/

Oh this is good.

Do explain how these two articles support your waffling positions.

Also, how these two articles do anything to minimize Astrazenca admitting publicly in court that their drug causes blood clots.

And after you drop the pin on the map in Blow Duck, NC....define rare.

 

[Troglodyte]

Oh this is good.

Do explain how these two articles support your waffling positions.

Also, how these two articles do anything to minimize Astrazenca admitting publicly in court that their drug causes blood clots.

And after you drop the pin on the map in Blow Duck, NC....define rare.

If it weren’t for your mathematical and statistical illiteracy, I’d advise you to read the section discussing RISK RATIOS.

Do explain how the AstraZeneca story is “yuge news”.

 

[Superman]

Do explain how the AstraZeneca story is “yuge news”.

because it:

• confirmed what we have been saying for 800+ pages
• confirmed what you've attempted to spin, deflect and deny for 800+ pages

 

[Badcat]

If it weren’t for your mathematical and statistical illiteracy, I’d advise you to read the section discussing RISK RATIOS.

Do explain how the AstraZeneca story is “yuge news”.

Let me correct you, Estimated risk ratios. Key word, estimated.

What you fail to understand admit, is that these corrupt entities got filthy rich on a chemical compound that didn't STOP the transmission, effects, deaths, or hospitalizations and recommended that EVERYONE get the shot even though the High Risk demographic was the only one who truly benefited from the 70% efficiency of the vax. If you're so enamored with risk ratios, then why should children who were less than 1% vulnerable to contract the Wu-han virus get a shot with higher risk of pericarditis in that same demographic? could it be money? power? You're god damn right it is.

 

[Troglodyte]

because it:

• confirmed what we have been saying for 800+ pages
• confirmed what you've attempted to spin, deflect and deny for 800+ pages

So the past 800 pages were about VERY RARE blood clotting side effects with the AstraZeneca vaccine specifically? It a wonder nobody changed the name of the thread.

 

[ZonaBurgh]

because it:

• confirmed what we have been saying for 800+ pages
• confirmed what you've attempted to spin, deflect and deny for 800+ pages

And in 2 bullet points, you've outlined the crux of the matter.

Flog doesn't give an inch, never responds to direct questions, and continues to follow the mantra from 2020.

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

If it weren’t for your mathematical and statistical illiteracy, I’d advise you to read the section discussing RISK RATIOS.

Do explain how the AstraZeneca story is “yuge news”.

I'll ask you again (staying 'in-line' with the dialogue, something you can't consistently do)....define rare.

 

[Confluence]

And in 2 bullet points, you've outlined the crux of the matter.

Flog doesn't give an inch, never responds to direct questions, and continues to follow the mantra from 2020.

Almost the textbook example of "useful idiot".

 

[Superman]

So the past 800 pages were about VERY RARE blood clotting side effects with the AstraZeneca vaccine specifically? It a wonder nobody changed the name of the thread.

oh goddammit, you flucking retard.

you know damn well what's happened for 800 pages.

game on the line... Coach Flog is down 1 point... needs someone clutch... so ze sends Big Ben to the line to ice the game

 

[Superman]

Almost the textbook example of "useful idiot".

IS

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

So the past 800 pages were about VERY RARE blood clotting side effects with the AstraZeneca vaccine specifically? It a wonder nobody changed the name of the thread.

Astrazeneca, Pfizer, Moderna and J&J all have been studied/documented to lead to blood clotting as a side effect. Google is your friend.

The NEWS is that one of them is now having to pay up for the damages caused.

 

[Troglodyte]

Let me correct you, Estimated risk ratios. Key word, estimated.

What you fail to understand admit, is that these corrupt entities got filthy rich on a chemical compound that didn't STOP the transmission, effects, deaths, or hospitalizations and recommended that EVERYONE get the shot even though the High Risk demographic was the only one who truly benefited from the 70% efficiency of the vax. If you're so enamored with risk ratios, then why should children who were less than 1% vulnerable to contract the Wu-han virus get a shot with higher risk of pericarditis in that same demographic? could it be money? power? You're god damn right it is.

So the vaccines didn’t stop transmission, effects, deaths or hospitalizations but the high risk demographic truly benefited from them. You literally just stated that.

 

[Superman]

So the vaccines didn’t stop transmission, effects, deaths or hospitalizations but the high risk demographic truly benefited from them. You literally just stated that.

no, diply.... this is what he said:

What you fail to understand admit, is that these corrupt entities got filthy rich on a chemical compound that didn't STOP the transmission, effects, deaths, or hospitalizations and recommended that EVERYONE get the shot even though the High Risk demographic was the only one who truly benefited from the 70% efficiency of the vax.

 

[Troglodyte]

I'll ask you again (staying 'in-line' with the dialogue, something you can't consistently do)....define rare.

Sufficiently uncommon that nobody is talking about it.

 

[SteelerInLebanon]

Sufficiently uncommon that nobody is talking about it.

Your definition of nobody is quite interesting.

 

[Troglodyte]

Your definition of nobody is quite interesting.

Do you realize that this “huge” news story is that AstraZeneca admitted in court to a rare side effect that THEY listed (admitted) as a possible side effect when THEY released the vaccine?

 

[SteelerInLebanon]

Do you realize that this “huge” news story is that AstraZeneca admitted in court to a rare side effect that THEY listed (admitted) as a possible side effect when THEY released the vaccine?

It is huge, only those who have something to lose politically or financially would disagree. Unfortunately that list is extremely long and includes almost all politicians, particularly an the left but on the right as well and almost every single person in the media. That is why it isn't being blasted out like it should. You have put politics and money ahead of actual scientific standards and safety practices. Period.

 

[Troglodyte]

It is huge, only those who have something to lose politically or financially would disagree. Unfortunately that list is extremely long and includes almost all politicians, particularly a the left but on the right as well and almost every single person in the media. That is why it isn't being blasted out like it should. You have put politics and money ahead of actual scientific standards and safety practices. Period.

No, just no. Scientific standards and safety practices? You watch TV for 15 minutes and you’re likely to hear “rare but serious side effects” used in a drug ad.

 

[Superman]

No, just no. Scientific standards and safety practices? You watch TV for 15 minutes and you’re likely to hear “rare but serious side effects” used in a drug ad.

but, why? i was told - on this very board, nonetheless - that "rare but serious side effects" are inconsequential when/if a drug provides YUGE promise and assistance to any demographic.

 

[SteelerInLebanon]

No, just no. Scientific standards and safety practices? You watch TV for 15 minutes and you’re likely to hear “rare but serious side effects” used in a drug ad.

Trogs words to live by,