It does have a nice ring.
I just thing the thing is you could get worse. I think we tend to think if we just change coaches, whamoo! it'll get better. And look, I would try it. I am tired of watching it now. The same thing. For example, I have argued with people when they say adjustments. Tomlin doesn't make adjustments. My counter point has been how do we know? What if it just one team playing better or worse? Well, on Thursday night the exact same defense that was not stopping anything in the first half looked the same in the 2nd. Exactly the same. I thought Flores was supposed to fix some of that. I know it's early in this season anyway, but Mike Tomlin is the constant here. And nothing changes.
But like I said, I would try it. But as a fan, I'm going into it realizing that it may not be the cure all. The thing is in Pittsburgh a new coach, just like the last 3, would be given full support and every opportunity to succeed. No undermining of coaches would go on. I think that is why you don't have situations in Pittsburgh of a coach losing a team. The players know the coach has support from up top. So why not try somebody new?
Sorry if that's all over the place. I'm kinda think typing.
And what I don't like is some of the arguments used to try to show he should be fired. Because it makes us look like a bunch of women. You know how your wife wants you to do something, you don't wanna, and she makes it out to be something deeper when all you want to do is watch the game or go fishing. That's what we sound like when we do the Tomlin didn't win with his own team, or no coaching tree or whatever. The results are enough for me.
www.pro-football-reference.com
