• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Dem primaries begin! Let there be fire and brimstone in Iowa!

Biden still getting the **** kicked out of him by a communist, a girl and a ladyboy

71% reporting in Iowa now, delegate count


Pete 26.8%

Bernie 25.2

Liz. 18.4

Creepy Uncle Joe. 15.4
 
Last edited:
I just want to see Bernie get screwed so his ultra liberal, kombucha-drinkin' followers can set some towns a'lite!

But we want Bernie to fight to the end, he attacks moderate Dems and says they are the same as Republicans and inspires his cult of Bernie or Busters to stay home and not vote when he loses
 
Time to recognize the (D)ims for what they have been for at least 50 years - corporate shills. The middle-class working base has long since moved to the Republican party, which inexplicably treats the working class like **** most of the time. Now, the (D)ims go to bat for banks and billionaire universities and multi-national corporations shipping jobs overseas.

I'm old enough to remember when the Democrats represented Labor and wanted tariffs and the Republicans were the party of big corporations and wanted free trade and cheap labor.
 
Biden still getting the **** kicked out of him by a communist, a girl and a ladyboy

71% reporting in Iowa now, delegate count


Pete 26.8%

Bernie 25.2

Liz. 18.4

Creepy Uncle Joe. 15.4

Biden needs to go find that chain he used on "Corn Pop" to regain his masculinity.
 
I think this delay and supposed botched result is intentional. There are 2 fronts. 1 Biden got smoked and they want to hide that as best they could. 2. I believe this was a first step in removing Iowa as the first primary and was done intentionally to paint them as rubes who can’t be trusted with something as important as the nation’s first election.

Dems are all in on identity politics. You are already hearing them complain that Iowa is too white and not representative of the country. They know that the first few primaries build momentum and once a candidate has a few wins they are tough to beat.

They want those first primaries to be in loony liberal states where their preferred candidates will fare better. They will use this to discredit Iowa and move primaries from maybe NY or Mass up to first. Have the coastal states vote first, essentially decide the nominee and then Dems don’t have to dirty themselves visiting middle America and pretending they don’t hate the people there.
 
I'm old enough to remember when the Democrats represented Labor and wanted tariffs and the Republicans were the party of big corporations and wanted free trade and cheap labor.

I remember when the hippies wanted nothing to do with government, now they and generally their kids can't get enough of it in every aspect of their lives. What comes around goes around I guess.
 
I think this delay and supposed botched result is intentional. There are 2 fronts. 1 Biden got smoked and they want to hide that as best they could. 2. I believe this was a first step in removing Iowa as the first primary and was done intentionally to paint them as rubes who can’t be trusted with something as important as the nation’s first election.

Dems are all in on identity politics. You are already hearing them complain that Iowa is too white and not representative of the country. They know that the first few primaries build momentum and once a candidate has a few wins they are tough to beat.

They want those first primaries to be in loony liberal states where their preferred candidates will fare better. They will use this to discredit Iowa and move primaries from maybe NY or Mass up to first. Have the coastal states vote first, essentially decide the nominee and then Dems don’t have to dirty themselves visiting middle America and pretending they don’t hate the people there.

Maybe the Russians screwed up their election. ;)
 
I think this delay and supposed botched result is intentional. There are 2 fronts. 1 Biden got smoked and they want to hide that as best they could. 2. I believe this was a first step in removing Iowa as the first primary and was done intentionally to paint them as rubes who can’t be trusted with something as important as the nation’s first election.

Dems are all in on identity politics. You are already hearing them complain that Iowa is too white and not representative of the country. They know that the first few primaries build momentum and once a candidate has a few wins they are tough to beat.

They want those first primaries to be in loony liberal states where their preferred candidates will fare better. They will use this to discredit Iowa and move primaries from maybe NY or Mass up to first. Have the coastal states vote first, essentially decide the nominee and then Dems don’t have to dirty themselves visiting middle America and pretending they don’t hate the people there.

Diversity = Anti-white. You can have diversity with no white people at all. That's the point. It was all along. Whites somehow still don't get it. They hate you because you are white. The left is all about self hating whites and minorities that hate whites. Which is why they've lost their base from years ago. They use to be all about labor and protecting jobs. Now they are about identity politics and hating one race of people. Those people need to wake up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xjx
I think this delay and supposed botched result is intentional. There are 2 fronts. 1 Biden got smoked and they want to hide that as best they could. 2. I believe this was a first step in removing Iowa as the first primary and was done intentionally to paint them as rubes who can’t be trusted with something as important as the nation’s first election.

Dems are all in on identity politics. You are already hearing them complain that Iowa is too white and not representative of the country. They know that the first few primaries build momentum and once a candidate has a few wins they are tough to beat.

They want those first primaries to be in loony liberal states where their preferred candidates will fare better. They will use this to discredit Iowa and move primaries from maybe NY or Mass up to first. Have the coastal states vote first, essentially decide the nominee and then Dems don’t have to dirty themselves visiting middle America and pretending they don’t hate the people there.

Judging by the finishing order, seems Iowa has its share of loony libs.
 
Its hilarious watching the MSM turn on the Dems in Iowa, Chris Matthews: "Democrats in Iowa couldn't organize a three car parade"

lolololol
 
Diversity = Anti-white. You can have diversity with no white people at all. That's the point. It was all along. Whites somehow still don't get it. They hate you because you are white. The left is all about self hating whites and minorities that hate whites. Which is why they've lost their base from years ago. They use to be all about labor and protecting jobs. Now they are about identity politics and hating one race of people. Those people need to wake up.

Anybody who doubts Vader on this is just not paying attention. "Diversity" is great. So what if the newly-diverse don't speak the language, have no skills, have no means of support, soak up government funds by the billions, hate America, do everything they can to replicate the shithole they came from, and seek to turn America into the same shithole that was so wonderful they lined up by the millions to get the **** out?

Diversity ... it's great in America, Canada, England, France, Germany, Norway, and just TERRIBLE in Africa, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, every other "Stan" country, and every other third world shithole.

Funny how that works.
 
92% of the precincts in, 86% of the vote in IOWA

Pete still with 1% lead

https://www.kcci.com/article/kcci-iowa-caucus-results/30599739

-------------------

The gloves come off in VT


Biden casts top rivals as a risk for party that wants to win


SOMERSWORTH, New Hampshire (AP) — With questions swirling about the long-term viability of his campaign, Joe Biden sharply criticized two of his top rivals on Wednesday, suggesting Sen. Bernie Sanders, a democratic socialist, was unelectable, while 38-year-old Pete Buttigieg would be a risky and inexperienced choice.

“If Sen. Sanders is the nominee for the party, every Democrat in America up and down the ballot, in blue states, red states, purple states and easy districts and competitive ones, every Democrat will have to carry the label Senator Sanders has chose for himself”

Biden said he had “great respect” for Buttigieg, but didn’t think the Democrats’ standard-bearer against President Donald Trump should be someone who hasn’t been elected to a higher office than mayor of South Bend, Indiana, a city of about 100,00. “It’s a risk, to be just straight up with you,” he said.

The tough talk comes as Biden's third presidential bid enters a critical stretch. He needs to bounce back from what partial results suggest could be a disappointing finish in Monday's Iowa caucuses

“If he came in fourth, yeah, that could hurt,” said Bill Freeman, a Biden donor from Nashville, Tennessee, who added that he hadn’t even considered such a possibility heading into Monday’s caucuses. “That’s a bad night, no matter how you spin it.”

Most precarious for Biden: Some of the would-be donors he could win over with a strong showing are giving new looks to Mike Bloomberg, the former New York City mayor whose entire strategy of sitting out the four early nominating states is pegged to the possibility that Biden falters. Bloomberg, one of the world’s wealthiest men with a net worth approaching $60 billion, isn’t asking for money. He’s simply looking for support that could cut off financial lifelines to Biden, whose campaign reported just $9 million cash on hand to start the year.

https://apnews.com/8a6ea236b5abcb43b40f79cfbf3f8c20
 
Last edited:
**** Sleepy, Creepy Uncle Joe Biden. "Look, fat." That dude should have knocked him on his ***.
 
Right now I suspect the odds for the Dem nomination is like 50% bloomberg, 25% Bernard, 20% Peter and 5%some other surprise candidate... Biden probably would have won had he run on Obamas coattails last time but the shine is off that apple now... Warren isn’t going to out Bernie Bernie and is too far left for the mod dems...
 
Right now I suspect the odds for the Dem nomination is like 50% bloomberg, 25% Bernard, 20% Peter and 5%some other surprise candidate... Biden probably would have won had he run on Obamas coattails last time but the shine is off that apple now... Warren isn’t going to out Bernie Bernie and is too far left for the mod dems...
BigGulp Mike
vs
Orange Man Bad

battle of Gotham's billionaires

ain't America great?

Sent from my SM-N950W using Steeler Nation mobile app
 
One ******* state at a time, this thread will have 100 more pages before we know all that, lol



Looks like Bernie could pull this one out in Iowa

96% reporting

26.2 Pete ...550 delegates

26.1 Bernie...447 delegates
 
Last edited:
Oh no, a failed small-time **** mayor or a 78 year old socialist. How will The Donald ever win?
 
Right now I suspect the odds for the Dem nomination is like 50% bloomberg, 25% Bernard, 20% Peter and 5%some other surprise candidate... Biden probably would have won had he run on Obamas coattails last time but the shine is off that apple now... Warren isn’t going to out Bernie Bernie and is too far left for the mod dems...


Bloomberg is now running ads with Obama praising him. It will be interesting how those supporting the socialist leaning candidates, will react if Mike gets the nod.
 
92% of the precincts in, 86% of the vote in IOWA

Pete still with 1% lead

https://www.kcci.com/article/kcci-iowa-caucus-results/30599739

-------------------

The gloves come off in VT


Biden casts top rivals as a risk for party that wants to win


SOMERSWORTH, New Hampshire (AP) — With questions swirling about the long-term viability of his campaign, Joe Biden sharply criticized two of his top rivals on Wednesday, suggesting Sen. Bernie Sanders, a democratic socialist, was unelectable, while 38-year-old Pete Buttigieg would be a risky and inexperienced choice.

“If Sen. Sanders is the nominee for the party, every Democrat in America up and down the ballot, in blue states, red states, purple states and easy districts and competitive ones, every Democrat will have to carry the label Senator Sanders has chose for himself”

Biden said he had “great respect” for Buttigieg, but didn’t think the Democrats’ standard-bearer against President Donald Trump should be someone who hasn’t been elected to a higher office than mayor of South Bend, Indiana, a city of about 100,00. “It’s a risk, to be just straight up with you,” he said.

The tough talk comes as Biden's third presidential bid enters a critical stretch. He needs to bounce back from what partial results suggest could be a disappointing finish in Monday's Iowa caucuses

“If he came in fourth, yeah, that could hurt,” said Bill Freeman, a Biden donor from Nashville, Tennessee, who added that he hadn’t even considered such a possibility heading into Monday’s caucuses. “That’s a bad night, no matter how you spin it.”

Most precarious for Biden: Some of the would-be donors he could win over with a strong showing are giving new looks to Mike Bloomberg, the former New York City mayor whose entire strategy of sitting out the four early nominating states is pegged to the possibility that Biden falters. Bloomberg, one of the world’s wealthiest men with a net worth approaching $60 billion, isn’t asking for money. He’s simply looking for support that could cut off financial lifelines to Biden, whose campaign reported just $9 million cash on hand to start the year.

https://apnews.com/8a6ea236b5abcb43b40f79cfbf3f8c20

"I like Bernie Madoff as much as anyone, but we can agree that he is no good for New London, or for the rest of Massachusetts, for that matter. How are you going to run for president when you are in jail in New Jersey? We need to get real folks. It's like my friend Pete Bootycall. We kiss all the time, but I would never elect him as president. This guy was like the governor or Puerto Rico or something. Small timer. And his wife is a husband. We need to get real folks."
 
Last edited:
All week you heard from Main Stream Media how turnout was going to be "all-time" great. That the "RESISTANCE" was so great against Trump that democrats were going to turn out in droves.

Turnout in Iowa was WAY BELOW what they expected - 170,000. Not even close to the record way back in 2008 (you know, when things were so political), when it was 240,000. New voters accounted for 35% of caucusers. Down from 44% in 2016 and 57% in 2008. Minority turnout was WAY LOWER than expected.

All really, really bad news for Democrats. All the things the main stream media wants to feed us is bullshit. They want SO BAD to defeat Trump they literally just make **** up. Hand-picked "expert" after "expert" from liberal think tanks or liberal elite colleges with do-nothing degrees tell us the "RESISTANCE" is strong and the hatred of Donald Trump is everywhere and democrats are going to turnout in vast numbers.

It's just wrong. And the sad thing is, Tibs (way off 5000 miles away) believes is all hook, line and sinker. He gets all his information from these same media sources that spew biased, one-sided "evidence" of how America feels about issues. When you pick how the headline reads, when you pick the so-called "experts" to reinforce what you want to report as "news", when you spin facts unequally or attack one side hypocritically, you get news that loses all respectability from the masses. And this snowballs into their inability to see the real stories.

It's just sad how far our news media has fallen in worship of clicks, eyeballs and revenue in the internet age. There is just no integrity at all in the medium.
 
Turnout was low in Iowa because the white people in Iowa don't feel the ugency that black and brown people feel because white people's children aren't being put in cages.

She's referring to the ICE facilities designed and built during the first black president's administration, and populated by illegal border-crossing families encouraged to break our laws by the policies and selective enforcement of the first black president.

Apparently she expects better turnout from illegal aliens in a more representative state.

https://freebeacon.com/politics/msn...ially-the-perfect-example-of-systemic-racism/
 
Sanders has effectively won Iowa. Even if he falls 1/10th of a percent behind Buttigieg, there simply isn't any way in hell this country is ready to elect an openly gay President. People can hem and haw and pretend they're open-minded enough to seriously consider Pete, the but the fact of the matter is, he's completely utterly un-electable.

That means, the next best option, Bernie is the big winner in terms of donations and support in the early running. Warren got her *** kicked and it's not looking good for her. She's basically a Bernie clone and clearly she isn't pulling the support he is.

Ultimately, Bloomberg is a democratic Trump clone and the truth is, Trump has the track record, Bloomberg doesn't. He's an unknown. I can't believe he can galvanize a democratic party so splintered with the socialist loving crowd. Bloomberg is many many things, but at the end of the day, the 60 Billion dollar man is a capitalist.
 
Sanders has effectively won Iowa. Even if he falls 1/10th of a percent behind Buttigieg, there simply isn't any way in hell this country is ready to elect an openly gay President. People can hem and haw and pretend they're open-minded enough to seriously consider Pete, the but the fact of the matter is, he's completely utterly un-electable.

I can't believe she's even running. South Bend is a hellhole that is ridden with crime and poverty. The police force hates her, blacks hate her, Christians hate her and American capitalists hate her. That's not how you be great.
 
Let Sanders be the front runner. He has ZERO chance of winning the popular election and electoral college. This is perfect for Trump to get re-elected.
 
Top