- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 14,848
- Reaction score
- 5,803
- Points
- 113
You should watch last night’s 60 minutes and listen to what Republicans have to about voting security and how much voter fraud actually exists.
Election Shenanigans Thread
- Thread starter tapeANaspirin2it
- Start date
I think it's more likely that Trump wins NY than PA. In NY the Dims aren't thinking that they need to print thousands of phony ballots.
Meantime there will be precincts in Pittsburgh, Erie, and Philly that will have 135% voter turnout.
Meantime there will be precincts in Pittsburgh, Erie, and Philly that will have 135% voter turnout.
what's that got to do with - as he said - dead people voting?
even your beloved Snopes says it happens.
and as badcat said - more dead people vote than have scored touchdowns in any football game.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 3,929
- Reaction score
- 7,465
- Points
- 113
How about YOU answer the question and stop deflecting, take some accountability here.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 14,848
- Reaction score
- 5,803
- Points
- 113
And it’s relevant how? How many elections has it come even remotely close to changing? Here’s a hint: NONE. EVER.
Again, watch the 60 minutes episodes, step outside your misinformation echo chamber.
go Flogtard, go!
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 14,848
- Reaction score
- 5,803
- Points
- 113
What’s your point? How is dead people voting relevant? In which election did it change the outcome?
i watched it, and began to wonder why i'm wasting precious moments of my life watching a far left MSM echo chamber looking for confirmation validation about something we all know is true.
60 minutes, you mean the show that cuts and edits to make their choice for President look better? That 60 minutes?
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 14,848
- Reaction score
- 5,803
- Points
- 113
No one is denying that TRUMP asked Raffensperger to throw the election. I bet that’s the part where you turned it off. Ammiright???
This will continue until someone in the House has the intestinal fortitude to introduce a bill on how elections will be held.
Paper ballots, hand counted, election day voting only, absentee ballots limited for military personnel, etc., election day is a national holiday and polls open for 24 hours.
ID's, ID's, ID's, no one should be in favor of non-US citizens voting. And election results need to be known the night of the election, no excuses.
Until this happens, the loser of any election will be screaming and filing lawsuits. It shouldn't be this complicated, make the insanity end.
Paper ballots, hand counted, election day voting only, absentee ballots limited for military personnel, etc., election day is a national holiday and polls open for 24 hours.
ID's, ID's, ID's, no one should be in favor of non-US citizens voting. And election results need to be known the night of the election, no excuses.
Until this happens, the loser of any election will be screaming and filing lawsuits. It shouldn't be this complicated, make the insanity end.
Trump and Harris are both in Pittsburgh tonight.
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2014
- Messages
- 11,029
- Reaction score
- 13,145
- Points
- 113
Except that they're laying groundwork for a long delay (so they can figure out how many they have to print.)
Total horseshit.
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2014
- Messages
- 10,042
- Reaction score
- 5,739
- Points
- 113
I agree with everything but the paper ballots. I think paper ballots would be as easy to fake as anything plus that would be a tall task counting everything. Im not sure how the machines work exactly, but they should not be online and should provide a summary at the end. Reps from both parties should verify that the total ballots cast is the same as the sign in for the polling center.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 5,260
- Reaction score
- 5,630
- Points
- 113
If polling precincts are to large to hand count and verify in 24 hrs, there should be more precincts.
This is not difficult. Show up, show ID, sign in, mark the ballot that is given to you, enter ballot in sealed cardboard box. When box has 100 ballots entered, the box is taken to the counting area. When 5 boxes have accumulated, they are opened at random and counting is begun. Team A is comprised of 2 party observers and a caller. Both observers tally the votes as called and supply a tally sheet for each box. The ballots and tally sheets are sealed in a bag and passed to a second group of observers to have the tally sheets compared without opening said bag. If the sheets match they are tabulated as confirmed and that bag is added to the others confirmed and sealed for security. If the tally sheets are different, the process is repeated by Team B. At the end of each hour teams are rotated between 3-4 teams. All collection boxes, and tally locations, as well as storage areas are to have continuous video surveillance and security.
I actually agree with it being open 24 hrs, and NO CONNECTION TO THE OUTSIDE WORLD.
This is not difficult. Show up, show ID, sign in, mark the ballot that is given to you, enter ballot in sealed cardboard box. When box has 100 ballots entered, the box is taken to the counting area. When 5 boxes have accumulated, they are opened at random and counting is begun. Team A is comprised of 2 party observers and a caller. Both observers tally the votes as called and supply a tally sheet for each box. The ballots and tally sheets are sealed in a bag and passed to a second group of observers to have the tally sheets compared without opening said bag. If the sheets match they are tabulated as confirmed and that bag is added to the others confirmed and sealed for security. If the tally sheets are different, the process is repeated by Team B. At the end of each hour teams are rotated between 3-4 teams. All collection boxes, and tally locations, as well as storage areas are to have continuous video surveillance and security.
I actually agree with it being open 24 hrs, and NO CONNECTION TO THE OUTSIDE WORLD.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 3,929
- Reaction score
- 7,465
- Points
- 113
I'll answer your questions when you answer the one that I posed. It really is as simple as you answer the question and then ask a follow up whereby I then answer your question and ask a follow up of my own. THAT is dialog. So, answer my question if you wish for me to answer yours.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 14,848
- Reaction score
- 5,803
- Points
- 113
No, a dead man has never scored a touchdown. Oh, the dialogue! Now show me where dead people voting has been relevant in the outcome of an election.
no, it was maybe a nanosecond after I clicked on the interview via YouTube.
and if you really think what Trump was asking was "throwing the election," you're as dumb as we all figured you to be years ago.
He won't, ever, because with nothing to stand on, he can't. Really, just a waste of your time, even the entertainment factor is wearing thin.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 3,929
- Reaction score
- 7,465
- Points
- 113
Thank you! Holy ****...getting you to answer a simple question shouldn't be this difficult.
Now, to answer your question, my point was not that dead people voting has been relevant to election outcomes, it was simply noted that dead people have voted.
With that in mind, it's noted that people who never requested a ballot are receiving them, and in some cases, multiple ballots. If there are over 18,000 dead people on voter records in Virgina dating back to 1960 (this is a fact) then there is potential for 18,000 ballots mailed to the address on record for those dead people. If even half of those people recieving said ballots fills them in, it could influence an election. The fact of the matter is that mail in voting is new, and we really don't have data on fraud just yet.
Similar threads
