FBI executes search warrant at Trump's Mar-a-Lago
- Thread starter Booted
- Start date
Someone tells you the FBI hasn't been weaponized, you buy it.
Someone tells you masks work, you wear three.
Someone tells you to social distance, you Karen anyone who violates 6 feet.
Please son, go on.
Trump apparently is thanking Biden, Merrick and the FBI today. 10 point jump.
www.businessinsider.com
Mar-a-Lago raid gave Trump a 10-point boost over DeSantis with Republican primary voters, poll shows
The FBI search widens Donald Trump's significant lead over potential 2024 rival Ron DeSantis among GOP voters, per a POLITICO/Morning Consult poll.
www.businessinsider.com
Gosh, I remember all the raids on the Clintons and their properties for things like this.
abcnews.go.com
President Bill Clinton Lost Nuclear Codes While in Office, New Book Claims
According to a new book by the former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Hugh Shelton, President Bill Clinton lost the so-called "biscuit," the card carrying the nuclear codes, for months during his presidency.
abcnews.go.com
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 15,117
- Reaction score
- 6,013
- Points
- 113
So Trump didn’t have classified documents at Mar-a-Lago? He’s above the law? Go on record.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 15,117
- Reaction score
- 6,013
- Points
- 113
How do we know the election wasn’t stolen? There’s no evidence of that, but how do we know? ******* pointless.
If you can point to me saying he did or didn't have X at the resort, I'll defend it.
Provide the post # where I said this.
What??? Are you on your Xannies this morning?
Excellent read by Matt Taibbi
taibbi.substack.com
Welcome to the Third World
The FBI really better have something "pulverizing" on Trump, because otherwise we've just witnessed one of the dumbest moves in the history of politics
taibbi.substack.com
LOL, just watch.
are now suggesting the abstract idea that former Presidents should not have documents at their home after their term?
Even Adam Schiff Is Flummoxed When Asked Why They Waited 18 Months if FBI Raid Was so Necessary
When even his Shiftiness can't explain it...
redstate.com
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) — the guy who is, unfortunately for the country, the head of the House Intelligence Committee — appeared on “Face the Nation” on Sunday with Margaret Brennan.
Brennan asked Schiff about the FBI raid on President Donald Trump and she asked a terrific question, the same question that so many of us have been asking — if this was truly the “national security” issue they are trying to portray it as now, why did they wait 18 months? I’d even add another point to that — why did they wait three days after they got the warrant on August 5 to execute it?
There’s no evidence in the warrant that there were any “nuclear” documents, there’s only a “sources” report from the Washington Post. ”What was the change that made this immediate?” Brennan asked.
Schiff was flummoxed — he had no answer because there truly isn’t one. “Uh, I don’t know,” he said. But that’s the true question that needs to be asked here. Neither he nor the DOJ is answering it.
View attachment 9229
Even Adam Schiff Is Flummoxed When Asked Why They Waited 18 Months if FBI Raid Was so Necessary
When even his Shiftiness can't explain it...
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) — the guy who is, unfortunately for the country, the head of the House Intelligence Committee — appeared on “Face the Nation” on Sunday with Margaret Brennan.
Brennan asked Schiff about the FBI raid on President Donald Trump and she asked a terrific question, the same question that so many of us have been asking — if this was truly the “national security” issue they are trying to portray it as now, why did they wait 18 months? I’d even add another point to that — why did they wait three days after they got the warrant on August 5 to execute it?
There’s no evidence in the warrant that there were any “nuclear” documents, there’s only a “sources” report from the Washington Post. ”What was the change that made this immediate?” Brennan asked.
Schiff was flummoxed — he had no answer because there truly isn’t one. “Uh, I don’t know,” he said. But that’s the true question that needs to be asked here. Neither he nor the DOJ is answering it.
"sources" cannot be trusted unless they confirm my bias
/Flog
View attachment 9229
Even Adam Schiff Is Flummoxed When Asked Why They Waited 18 Months if FBI Raid Was so Necessary
When even his Shiftiness can't explain it...
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) — the guy who is, unfortunately for the country, the head of the House Intelligence Committee — appeared on “Face the Nation” on Sunday with Margaret Brennan.
Brennan asked Schiff about the FBI raid on President Donald Trump and she asked a terrific question, the same question that so many of us have been asking — if this was truly the “national security” issue they are trying to portray it as now, why did they wait 18 months? I’d even add another point to that — why did they wait three days after they got the warrant on August 5 to execute it?
There’s no evidence in the warrant that there were any “nuclear” documents, there’s only a “sources” report from the Washington Post. ”What was the change that made this immediate?” Brennan asked.
Schiff was flummoxed — he had no answer because there truly isn’t one. “Uh, I don’t know,” he said. But that’s the true question that needs to be asked here. Neither he nor the DOJ is answering it.
Yeah, but to be fair, Adam Schiff is flummoxed by a light switch.
"As of now, it’s impossible to say if Trump’s alleged offense was great, small, or in between."Excellent read by Matt Taibbi
View attachment 9228
Welcome to the Third World
The FBI really better have something "pulverizing" on Trump, because otherwise we've just witnessed one of the dumbest moves in the history of politics
Let me add to that the possibility of non-existent.
FBI has ruined their credibility. I don’t see how any evidence they have can be taken seriously in any court outside of D.C.
Just because Pennsylvania tallied 1.2 million mail-in ballots but only mailed out 700,000 doesn’t mean anything fishy was going on. No sireee Bob….
Here we go again with the math.
Pennsylvania did not have hundreds of thousands of phantom absentee ballots
CLAIM: Pennsylvania election officials mailed out 1.8 million ballots but counted votes from more than 2.5 mailed ballots. AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. The statistic combines data from Pennsylvania’s June primary election, in which 1.8 million voters requested vote-by-mail ballots, and data from...
apnews.com
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 15,117
- Reaction score
- 6,013
- Points
- 113
Fake news.
PolitiFact - No, Pennsylvania didn’t send out more mail-in ballots than were cast in the 2020 election
Just as some Americans continue to circulate the disproved claim that Democrats stole Donald Trump’s win in the 2020 pre
www.politifact.com
Hmmmm.
thefederalist.com
Records Suggest A Bureaucrat Hack's Gripe Spurred Trump Raid
The purpose of the grand jury investigation and raid on Mar-a-Lago was to get Donald Trump, not documents.
thefederalist.com
Of course, there will be no "raids" as a result of this.
Laws for thee, but not for me.
dailycaller.com
Laws for thee, but not for me.
EXCLUSIVE: Biden’s CIA Director Employed Undisclosed Chinese Communist Party Members While Heading Elite DC Think Tank
CIA Director William Burns formerly headed a D.C. think tank while it employed undisclosed CCP members and individuals with Chinese government ties.
dailycaller.com
The Department of Justice is opposing a request from former President Donald Trump's attorneys seeking an independent special master to review records that were seized from his Mar-a-Lago estate, even though that process would allow it to appear more impartial following the raid, one of the former president's attorneys, Alina Habba, said on Newsmax Monday.
"In these types of situations what happens is the attorney handling it will ask that there be an independent special master, which is an attorney that gets appointed to oversee and to make sure everything is done correctly," Habba said on Newsmax's "Wake Up America," explaining that the master would be independent of both Trump's side and that of the DOJ."
"It's a neutral party," Habba said. "Think of it much like a mediator. They just make sure that the t's are being crossed, the i's are being dotted, and there's no funny business."
A decision will be made soon, she added, but "optically, it's a good idea," said Habba. "I think that you need to look impartial, especially given the negative impact that this has had on the country right now. I would try and look as open to having as much transparency as possible."