I have not misinterpreted your contention. I just used the Harris injury in camp as an example. The more accurate one would be the Ben injury. Should have Ben sat a few games a year, or gotten a few series off every game in the event that overuse to his arm may lead to injury? Because the argument could be made that it was overuse that caused the elbow to go. But would have you done anything with Ben to mitigate that possibility? Is it only running backs that get this consideration?I’m not speaking to this particular injury
Past history clearly shows a correlation between backs having a higher probability of season ending injury after heavy workload
Again it’s not rocket science, just common sense that has been shown to be statistically a higher probability
Simple numbers
Don’t try to tell me my contention when you’re inaccurate about what my contention is
You are making the contention, it is up to you to prove that overuse caused a particular injury to a running back. The truth is it cannot be with any certainty. The reason there are running backs in the Hall of Fame is due to their long, consistent careers, with the exception of Gale Sayers and Terrell Davis. Those players got the stats they got due to their workloads. They didn't get hurt. They were special and lucky. I think luck still plays much more of a role in this then overwork.