• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

January 6th Committee live on prime time tv

She clearly has the best boob job in show business. She was very cute before the boob job. But, to compete in Hollywood, you need a boob job.
 
She clearly has the best boob job in show business. She was very cute before the boob job. But, to compete in Hollywood, you need a boob job.

I could care less about her boobs. It's those legs and hips for me..haha
 
LEAVE RAY ALONE!!!!
/Flog

 
LEAVE RAY ALONE!!!!
/Flog

 
As usual, there are two sides to every coin. We are witnessing the Ray Epps Defense Tour. Completely coordinated. And supported by dirty Clinton operatives. Look at the players, look at the $$. Isn't hard to figure out what's up.


The curious case of Ray Epps stands as the most conspicuous and damning thorn in the side of the Regime’s official narrative of the January 6 Fedsurrection.

It is fair to say if it hadn’t been for the intrepid reporting of Tucker Carlson and Revolver News (if the reader will permit a bit of self-contragulation) the burning questions surrounding Epps’ involvement in January 6 would not have received the national attention that they deserve. According to the transcript of the January 6th Committee’s interrogation of Epps, Epps himself singles out Revolver News along with representatives Massie, Gaetz, and others as the chief culprit in circulating so-called “baseless conspiracy theories” surrounding Epps’ behavior.

The New York Times even summoned its most reliable journalistic janitor to pen a fully dedicated puff piece on Epps, presenting Epps as a deeply wronged victim of conspiracy theories peddled by the pesky likes of Tucker Carlson and Revolver News. We invite readers to revisit Darren Beattie’s viral brutal takedown of this Times piece — a journalistic embarrassment even by the standard of the New York Times.

Ray Epps has recently launched the next bizarre phase of his grievance tour, and the New York Times has once again enlisted itself to provide sympathetic coverage. This time, Ray Epps demands that Tucker Carlson formally retract his “false and defamatory statements” and that Carlson issue a “full and on air apology” for “lies” in relation to Epps.

It is tempting to immediately address the substance of Epps’ ridiculous accusations, but it would be remiss to do so without pointing out the buried lede here— that is, the identity of Epps’ new lawyer. Epps’ former lawyer who advised him through the Jan 6 Committee questioning and other things was a man by the name of John Blischak, who just happens to be a 9 year veteran of the FBI.

Epps’ new lawyer is Michael Teter, has an even more unlikely pedigree for a defender of Epps. Teter currently works for an organization called Facts First USA, a nakedly partisan organization targeting the agenda of the so-called “MAGA Majority” in Congress. The President of Facts First USA is none other than the disgraced Democrat/Clinton machine hatchet man David Brock.

For those unfamiliar, Brock’s resume includes founding the Soros funded Media Matters, a so-called “watchdog” group that watches conservative media 24/7 and excerpts “gotcha” clips for political purposes. Brock’s current Superpac ran an 80 million dollar opposition research campaign for Biden, and the New York Times described Brock’s former group Correct the Record as “Hillary Clinton’s own personal media watch dog.” Brock is most notorious, however, for his infamous “Brock Memo,” a memo formally titled “Democracy Action: Strategic Plan for Action” that served as a blueprint for the Democrat and Deep State alliance to undermine, neutralize, and destroy Trump’s presidency from day one.

As an underling of David Brock’s, Ray Epps’ new lawyer Michael Teter is every bit as embedded as Brock is within the nexus between the Clinton-Democrat Machine and the Deep State. Apart from Teter’s employment with Brock’s Facts First organization, Teter is the managing director of yet another Brock-project, the Democrat lawfare outfit known as The 65 Project.

When the Left wants something, you can be sure that limitless streams of money will soon pour forth to fund their destructive crusade. Recently, Axios profiled something significant you might have missed: “Project 65,” a new initiative funded by millions in “dark money” to destroy as many Trump-affiliated lawyers as possible.

At the retail level, Project 65’s purpose is to file bar complaints against 111 lawyers wherever they are licensed. At the wholesale level, it seeks to amend state bar rules, so that no lawyers with a sense of self-preservation will ever again want to bring election-related contests on behalf of President Trump, or any other populist conservative candidate. According to Project 65, everyone secretly knows that elections in Atlanta, Chicago, or Philadelphia (my home town) are entirely aboveboard, so any legal challenges to them must be in bad faith

To cap it all off, Teter used to work for the notorious law firm Perkins Coie, which functions as the legal arm for Hillary Clinton and the Democrats, and whose attorneys played a prominent role in promoting the so-called Russia hoax. Indeed, it was Perkins Coie lawyer Michael Sussmann who had a meeting with FBI senior officials in September of 2016 to present evidence of a relationship between Trump Organization and Russian Alfa bank—these allegations of course turned out to be completely false, like the rest of the Russia hoax.

And so again we see that Ray Epps’ new lawyer both institutionally and as a matter of professional networks inhabits the dark intersection between the Democrat machine, the Clinton machine, and the deep state national security apparatus. Of all lawyers, why would Ray Epps choose such an individual? Is Epps paying or is he getting representation for free? Perhaps more pointedly, of all clients, why would a David Brock lackey choose Ray Epps?

Good questions indeed. Didn't 60 Minutes (of lies) say he was broke and afraid living in a trailer?

Ray Epps has the machine protecting him.
 
As usual, there are two sides to every coin. We are witnessing the Ray Epps Defense Tour. Completely coordinated. And supported by dirty Clinton operatives. Look at the players, look at the $$. Isn't hard to figure out what's up.




















Good questions indeed. Didn't 60 Minutes (of lies) say he was broke and afraid living in a trailer?

Ray Epps has the machine protecting him.
Simple truth of the matter is that he'd be in jail or had his day in court if he wasn't a plant. Just like the rest of the folks the left was so intent on locking up. Things just don't add up here.
 
Simple truth of the matter is that he'd be in jail or had his day in court if he wasn't a plant. Just like the rest of the folks the left was so intent on locking up. Things just don't add up here.
Lotta people who did a lot less than Ray Epps have been in jail for two years with no trial date yet.
 
Lotta people who did a lot less than Ray Epps have been in jail for two years with no trial date yet.
I don't understand why there's not at least a few Republicans who can't raise enough hell to get them their day in court. Are lawyers not touching these cases with a 3 mile long pole?
 
I don't understand why there's not at least a few Republicans who can't raise enough hell to get them their day in court. Are lawyers not touching these cases with a 3 mile long pole?
The GOP doesn't run the DC courts and DOJ.
 
Today's reminder that we of what we ARE and what we are NOT.

I take notice of the consistent parroting by media about this country being a democracy.

 
Top