- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 2,147
- Reaction score
- 144
- Points
- 63
I heard the Pounceys were hanging with Johnny Football last night, oh the stories. Guns, coke, *******..........
Each has his own personality Im sure. I hope you can understand that.
LOL...it would appear, over the past 2 pages, that you simply want to argue - to argue. You've missed simple points I've made, such as "no, I'm not accusing him of murder, but the Pounceys are certainly poor judges of character" only to have you rebut that by saying the article I posted indicated that they were not a part of the shooting or named in the police report. Really? You put letters in bold to remind me that they had nothing to do with the murders when I specifically stated I'm not accusing them of murder, only for poor judgment and possible bad character? That's akin to me saying the sky is blue and you arguing that the sky is - blue.
And to that I'll point back to my original comments. I believe the night club story will be proven false, and they should be given the benefit of the doubt, but the Pounceys have shown questionable judgment (our own included) and it should be a cause for concern.
If those vague, non-accusatory feelings of mine have your panties in a bunch, well...enjoy the fit.
Actually, you stated that they were with him on a night when he committed murder.
the Pouncey's may have been with him earlier that night, but they don't appear to have been with him when the shooting occurred.
Not arguing to argue. But not sitting back taking misconstrued information as verified "down from the mountaintop" gospel either.
As far as your argument that the Pouncey's are some modern day version of the Corsican twins ... well, as I said, pure genius.
Get your facts straight. Come back with a better theorem and then let's discuss this from a realistic standpoint.
Btw, your vague "non-accusatory" (hell, let's call it what it is passive/aggressive) feelings of yours mean about as much to me as .... well some dude spouting drivel on the internet.
You actually ask a great question in the above. Not just for me, but for any Steelers fan out there. "If I/We were the owner of the Steelers, would I/We be concerned about Maurkice Pouncey's behaviors and at least have a discussion with him about his judgment"?
In answer, I would have had a discussion with him after the Hernandez hat situation. It would have entailed how even the appearance of inappropriate activity can lead to situations where your character comes into question, even if you are a person of good character. I don't believe that I would have had that discussion with him about the Dolphins hazing/bullying situation because quite honestly it had nothing to do with my team. Now, I'm kinda torn about discussing this latest incident with him as it appears to be a frivolous claim at this point. Do I look at the kid like he's damaged goods because of two incidents that happened when he was a Steeler? Nope.
As far as prior incidents when he was in college. I'd think they discussed those with him prior to the draft and came to a conclusion about his character at that point. I mean finding out that type of information prior to the draft is one of the duties of the scouting department.
Shaddup and tell the waiter to bring us another case of Cristal.
Based upon what you've written then, it seems we see eye to eye. I would have a chat with him after the hat incident. I would not have had a chat with him about Mike's incidents, because they are not his...save for to say something along the lines of "When you're out with your brother, keep it straight." I would have discussed this latest incident in light of the Ben incidents - "If you are in the wrong place at the wrong time, things like this can happen. Try to keep a low profile."
I don't see him as damaged goods. But I would have a closer eye on him, than say, other Steelers going forward only because these incidents seem to "find" him or he's found them. Again, neither of which means he's a bad guy, just showing some poor judgment.
Interestingly enough, the alleged victim in this issue can't seem to stick to the same story. First story was that the Pouncey's confronted him and they, along with the bouncers attacked him. Now? Apparently the Poucey's were taunting him in the VIP section and from there "someone" grabbed him, hit him, carried him outside and punched, kicked him and hit him with a bottle. Notice he does not state this time that the Pouncey's were the ones attacking him. Should be interesting to find out the truth such as it is.
http://www.Invalid Link - Check SN Home Page/2014/07/victims-alleged-nightclub-attack-expected-sue-pouncey-brothers/
Also the Rogmeister seems to have toned down his act in the past year. If Markice popped a dude on his own he may have been suspended but since Mike plays for another team, it's all good.Still no charges filed with/by police. Any talk about video of incident? Civil suit will get him nothing. This is over.
Sounds like accusations by the accuser. Seems like another member of our beloved PITTSBURGH STEELERS team, that went through the accusation story. M. Pouncy, take head and grow up, this isn't the hood anymore. You have team mates / owners / fans / etc. responsibilities. Good luck, not with this incident, but with what you need to do, now that you are in the lite.
Salute the nation
I'd like to take head and grow...
I'd like to take head and grow...
In the context of this thread it might not be as desirable as you think.