remember the whole $15/hour debacle? Pepperidge Farms does. So does McDonald's

[Tim Steelersfan]

No, you’re trying to change the argument since I proved (actually you proved) that the hourly cost was less $5/hr.

This is where you prove you're brain damaged. Go back. Re-read the thread. YOU and STEELTIME were arguing hourly wage. Go back and show me where, anywhere, I debated you on how much an hour an employee and/or a kiosk operated at.

You literally get yourself so lost in these debates it's comical.

My argument was that it was profitable regardless the employees were willing to work for $5 or $15/hr. Go back and check.

Oh, and the kiosks replace more than 3 workers at an hourly cost of $2.69, right? We can agree?

So once again you're arguing against yourself. And you can't even see it. You started off saying labor costs had no bearing on why companies automate.

Now you argue it does. From one page to another, you debate like a drunken, blind sailor.

 

[ZonaBurgh]

Flog is likely eristic, where he values winning an argument more highly than actually arriving at the truth.

It's why questions are never answered, and concessions are never made. Highly entertaining though.

 

[Troglodyte]

This is where you prove you're brain damaged. Go back. Re-read the thread. YOU and STEELTIME were arguing hourly wage. Go back and show me where, anywhere, I debated you on how much an hour an employee and/or a kiosk operated at.

You literally get yourself so lost in these debates it's comical.



So once again you're arguing against yourself. And you can't even see it. You started off saying labor costs had no bearing on why companies automate.

Now you argue it does. From one page to another, you debate like a drunken, blind sailor.

We were through this yesterday, post #34.

When you reply to a sentence or two with several paragraphs, you’re flailing. $2.69.

 

[Superman]

We were through this yesterday, post #34.

When you reply to a sentence or two with several paragraphs, you’re flailing. $2.69.

speaking of yesterday,

 

[Ironcitysteelers]

$5/hr., $7.50/hr., now $2.69/hr. You keep making up numbers because as I demonstrated, you are too stupid to multiply and divide.

Fifty!

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

We were through this yesterday, post #34.

When you reply to a sentence or two with several paragraphs, you’re flailing. $2.69.

And I've destroyed this position. I'll destroy it again since you're brain dead. Perhaps (I have little hope) this time you'll comprehend.



You claimed a kiosk was essentially a PC. I rebutted and destroyed that claim. One costs $500, the other $75K. One operates differently than the other. One provides different capabilities than the other.

An apple is not a Glock.
A hammer is not a dress shirt.
A kiosk is not a PC.
And your brain is damaged.

No where in that post was I discussing the hourly operational costs. My post dissected your claim that a kiosk is essentially a PC...which...it...is....not.

Your hourly rates arguments have been with Steeltime.

 

[Troglodyte]

speaking of yesterday,

Quit begging. Tim still needs 11,780 votes to win… and that’s just Georgia.

 

[Troglodyte]

And I've destroyed this position. I'll destroy it again since you're brain dead. Perhaps (I have little hope) this time you'll comprehend.

View attachment 11133

You claimed a kiosk was essentially a PC. I rebutted and destroyed that claim. One costs $500, the other $75K. One operates differently than the other. One provides different capabilities than the other.

An apple is not a Glock.
A hammer is not a dress shirt.
A kiosk is not a PC.
And your brain is damaged.

No where in that post was I discussing the hourly operational costs. My post dissected your claim that a kiosk is essentially a PC...which...it...is....not.

Your hourly rates arguments have been with Steeltime.

The PC reference was clearly regarding hourly operating costs. You know, $2.69.

 

[ZonaBurgh]

 

[Superman]

View attachment 11134

TF makes you think Flog wears shoes?

 

[Superman]

And I've destroyed this position. I'll destroy it again since you're brain dead. Perhaps (I have little hope) this time you'll comprehend.

View attachment 11133

You claimed a kiosk was essentially a PC. I rebutted and destroyed that claim. One costs $500, the other $75K. One operates differently than the other. One provides different capabilities than the other.

An apple is not a Glock.
A hammer is not a dress shirt.
A kiosk is not a PC.
And your brain is damaged.

No where in that post was I discussing the hourly operational costs. My post dissected your claim that a kiosk is essentially a PC...which...it...is....not.

Your hourly rates arguments have been with Steeltime.

why are you arguing with Ogre about which color shirt you prefer to wear when shooting apples with your glock?

Ogre wears blouses, anyway.

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

The PC reference was clearly regarding hourly operating costs.

As I have said to you repeatedly, you need remedial writing and English courses.

It would have been CLEAR if you had said a kiosk's operating costs are the same as a PC's. You didn't.

You said..."they're essentially PCs."

Now...you want to say what you said wasn't what you meant and you said something else.....

Take...the loss (again)

You know, $2.69.

Which is your argument with Steeltime. And you insist on being right about that number. I don't care, I already know a kiosk operates more cost effectively than a human being.

Yet...hear me out... every time you insist on making this argument about these dollars...you destroy your own initial argument.

Yet...you...continue.

 

[Troglodyte]

As I have said to you repeatedly, you need remedial writing and English courses.

It would have been CLEAR if you had said a kiosk's operating costs are the same as a PC's. You didn't.

You said..."they're essentially PCs."

Now...you want to say what you said wasn't what you meant and you said something else.....

Take...the loss (again)



Which is your argument with Steeltime. And you insist on being right about that number. I don't care, I already know a kiosk operates more cost effectively than a human being.

Yet...hear me out... every time you insist on making this argument about these dollars...you destroy your own initial argument.

Yet...you...continue.

WHAT???

If your interpretation of “they’re” wasn’t about the kiosks, why then did you proceed to discuss your knowledge of the costs of… the kiosks?!?!?!

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

WHAT???

If your interpretation of “they’re” wasn’t about the kiosks, why then did you proceed to discuss your knowledge of the costs of… the kiosks?!?!?!

Good Lord the level of idiocy you bring to this board is beyond comprehension.

You said a kiosk was essentially a PC.

I shredded that argument. 4x now. It's not. It's not close. In cost, size, function, format. You attempted to equate the two. That....in and of itself...cements the level of brain damage you clearly have.

"Hey, here's a hammer. It's essentially a hypersonic missile. Prove me wrong." /Floggy

 

[Confluence]

Somewhere, there is a story about a donkey, a tiger and a lion that would be useful here, now.

 

[Badcat]

WHAT???

If your interpretation of “they’re” wasn’t about the kiosks, why then did you proceed to discuss your knowledge of the costs of… the kiosks?!?!?!

Dude. please stop. This is just embarrassing now. It's so bad, I feel bad for you. seriously, just stop.

 

[MTC]

Fifty!

Jitter

 

[Iron95]

Somewhere, there is a story about a donkey, a tiger and a lion that would be useful here, now.

Broncos, Bengals and Lions?

 

[Troglodyte]

You said a kiosk was essentially a PC.

You literally just argued that you were unclear as to what I was talking about when I said “they’re”

I shredded that argument. 4x now. It's not. It's not close. In cost, size, function, format. You attempted to equate the two. That....in and of itself...cements the level of brain damage you clearly have.

So you shredded my argument (that you were supposedly unclear about) that the operating costs of the kiosks were less than $5/hr by declaring those cost are $2.69/hr? Could you be any more incoherent?

"Hey, here's a hammer. It's essentially a hypersonic missile. Prove me wrong." /Floggy

$2.69, right?

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

You literally just argued that you were unclear as to what I was talking about when I said “they’re”

Nope. You literally just showed...again...reading and writing are personal handicaps for you.

So you shredded my argument (that you were supposedly unclear about) that the operating costs of the kiosks were less than $5/hr by declaring those cost are $2.69/hr?

You literally continue to show...again...reading and writing are personal handicaps for you.

For the 14th time, I provided you a business case around investment costs. I never once argued about the hourly operating costs. Again, show me where I did. Don't say post #34 again. I've shredded that thrice.

Mr. "Labor Costs Had No Impact on McDonald's Deciding to Automate"

I've said to you....I don't care what hourly operating cost you and @Steeltime wanna settle on in your separate spat. $2.69 an hour. $5 an hour. $10 an hour. Whatever number you two decide is fair supports McDonald's automating and destroys your first argument.

I know Badcat begged you to stop. And I agree, you've humiliated yourself in this thread beyond belief. But I'd like you to continue. Your idiocy may drive others nuts. I find it entertaining.

 

[Troglodyte]

Nope. You literally just showed...again...reading and writing are personal handicaps for you.



You literally continue to show...again...reading and writing are personal handicaps for you.

For the 14th time, I provided you a business case around investment costs. I never once argued about the hourly operating costs. Again, show me where I did. Don't say post #34 again. I've shredded that thrice.

Mr. "Labor Costs Had No Impact on McDonald's Deciding to Automate"

I've said to you....I don't care what hourly operating cost you and @Steeltime wanna settle on in your separate spat. $2.69 an hour. $5 an hour. $10 an hour. Whatever number you two decide is fair supports McDonald's automating and destroys your first argument.

I know Badcat begged you to stop. And I agree, you've humiliated yourself in this thread beyond belief. But I'd like you to continue. Your idiocy may drive others nuts. I find it entertaining.

You interjected yourself into an existing argument about the operation costs relative to labor costs and then proceeded to support my argument. It really happened.

#$2.69

 

[Steeltime]

You interjected yourself into an existing argument about the operation costs relative to labor costs and then proceeded to support my argument. It really happened.

#$2.69

At this point, you should claim that your brother hacked into your SN account and made your last 10 posts simply to humiliate you.

You insist on making up demonstrably false numbers for the comparative cost of the machines. Why?

Finally, if the McDonald's employees agreed to work for free, would McDonald's replace them with machines? Why not?

 

[Superman]

would that ice cream machine still be broked?

 

[Badcat]

would that ice cream machine still be broked?

Imagining a robot smacking the Ice cream machine. "beep boop...come for me baby...beep boop...oh yeah..."

 

[Steeltime]

would that ice cream machine still be broked?

"The McDonald's ice cream machines work 100% of the time and you can get a cone for 3 cents."
- Floggy Math