Sitting on the deck enjoying a cold beer and watching the sun heading behind the mountains in the distance. It's almost 80. I likes me some climate change. Good work on building those windmills and solar farms, they've made a huge difference.
The Climate Change Thread
- Thread starter Tim Steelersfan
- Start date
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 9,477
- Reaction score
- 12,544
- Points
- 113
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 21,225
- Reaction score
- 23,605
- Points
- 113
Just wait until the next asteroid hits. They'd better serve the planet by preventing that from happening again.
Lol.Ahhhhhh, we're all going to die!! The end is near!! The experts are never wrong about these things! Wake up, right-wingers, death is knocking at the door! Ahhhhhhhh!!!!!!!
18 Spectacularly Wrong Predictions Made Around the Time of First Earth Day in 1970, Expect More This Year
Tomorrow (Sunday, April 22) is Earth Day 2018 and time for my annual Earth Day post….. In the May 2000 issue of Reason Magazine, award-winning science correspondent Ronald Bailey wrote an excellent article titled “Earth Day, Then and Now” to provide some historical perspective on the 30th...www.aei.org
Fear mongering at it’s finest
Could you make sure the asteroid hits Earth no where close to our party at the Excelsior's Club in Davos?
The economic consequences of the climate change hoax.
Here's why your groceries have gone up 78%:
Here's why your groceries have gone up 78%:
Reuters reporter admits climate change is bogus. Of course.
Neil Winton worked as a journalist at Reuters for 32 years, including as global Science and Technology Correspondent. He writes at Winton’s World.
From Neil Winton’s blog WintonsWorld: Climate Change; An Alternative View But Backed By Top Experts
Excerpt– Jan 23, 2023:
When I became Reuters global Science and Technology Correspondent in the mid-1990s, the global warming story was top of my agenda. Already by then the BBC was scaring us saying we would all die unless humankind mended its selfish ways. Carbon dioxide (CO2) was the culprit and had to be tamed, then eliminated. I had no reason to think this wasn’t established fact. I was wrong.
My Reuters credentials meant that I had easy access to the world’s finest climate scientists. To my amazement, none of these would say categorically that the link between CO2 and global warming, now known as climate change, was a proven scientific fact. Some said human production of CO2 was a probable cause, others that it might make some contribution; some said CO2 had no role at all. Everybody agreed that the climate had warmed over the last 10,000 years as the ice age retreated, but most weren’t really sure why. The sun’s radiation, which changes over time, was a favoured culprit.
My reporting reflected the wide range of views, with Reuters typical “on the one hand this, on the other, that” style. But even then, the mainstream media seem to have run out of the energy required, and often lazily went along with the BBC’s faulty, opinionated thesis. It was too much trouble to make the point that the BBC’s conclusion was challenged by many impressive scientists.
Fast forward 20 years and firm proof CO2 was warming the climate still hasn’t been established, but politics has taken over. Sure, there are plenty of computer models with their hidden assumptions ‘proving’ man is guilty as charged, and the assumption that we had the power and knowledge to change the climate became embedded.
The Left had lost all of the economic arguments by the 1990s, and its activists eagerly grabbed the chance to say free markets and small government couldn’t save us from climate change; only government intervention could do that. Letting capitalism run free was a certain way to ensure the end of the planet; smart Lefties should take charge and save us from ourselves.
The debate about climate change is far from over. I’m not a scientist so I don’t know enough to say it’s all man-made or not. But politicians and lobbyists have decided that we are all guilty. They are in the process of dismantling our way of life, ordering us to comply because it’s all for the future and our children. If we are going to give up our civilization, at the very least we ought to have an open debate. Journalists need to stand up and be counted. The trouble is that requires bravery and energy, and an urge to question conventional wisdom.
Reuters should be leading this movement. All it has to do is stand by its 10 Hallmarks. And maybe tell CCN thanks but no thanks; it needs to apply Reuters principles to its climate reporting.
32-year Reuters veteran reporter comes clean on ‘climate change’: ‘I had no reason to think this wasn’t established fact. I was wrong’
Neil Winton worked as a journalist at Reuters for 32 years, including as global Science and Technology Correspondent. He writes at Winton’s World.
From Neil Winton’s blog WintonsWorld: Climate Change; An Alternative View But Backed By Top Experts
Excerpt– Jan 23, 2023:
When I became Reuters global Science and Technology Correspondent in the mid-1990s, the global warming story was top of my agenda. Already by then the BBC was scaring us saying we would all die unless humankind mended its selfish ways. Carbon dioxide (CO2) was the culprit and had to be tamed, then eliminated. I had no reason to think this wasn’t established fact. I was wrong.
My Reuters credentials meant that I had easy access to the world’s finest climate scientists. To my amazement, none of these would say categorically that the link between CO2 and global warming, now known as climate change, was a proven scientific fact. Some said human production of CO2 was a probable cause, others that it might make some contribution; some said CO2 had no role at all. Everybody agreed that the climate had warmed over the last 10,000 years as the ice age retreated, but most weren’t really sure why. The sun’s radiation, which changes over time, was a favoured culprit.
My reporting reflected the wide range of views, with Reuters typical “on the one hand this, on the other, that” style. But even then, the mainstream media seem to have run out of the energy required, and often lazily went along with the BBC’s faulty, opinionated thesis. It was too much trouble to make the point that the BBC’s conclusion was challenged by many impressive scientists.
Fast forward 20 years and firm proof CO2 was warming the climate still hasn’t been established, but politics has taken over. Sure, there are plenty of computer models with their hidden assumptions ‘proving’ man is guilty as charged, and the assumption that we had the power and knowledge to change the climate became embedded.
The Left had lost all of the economic arguments by the 1990s, and its activists eagerly grabbed the chance to say free markets and small government couldn’t save us from climate change; only government intervention could do that. Letting capitalism run free was a certain way to ensure the end of the planet; smart Lefties should take charge and save us from ourselves.
The debate about climate change is far from over. I’m not a scientist so I don’t know enough to say it’s all man-made or not. But politicians and lobbyists have decided that we are all guilty. They are in the process of dismantling our way of life, ordering us to comply because it’s all for the future and our children. If we are going to give up our civilization, at the very least we ought to have an open debate. Journalists need to stand up and be counted. The trouble is that requires bravery and energy, and an urge to question conventional wisdom.
Reuters should be leading this movement. All it has to do is stand by its 10 Hallmarks. And maybe tell CCN thanks but no thanks; it needs to apply Reuters principles to its climate reporting.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 21,225
- Reaction score
- 23,605
- Points
- 113
...**** another March day of 80+ degree weather in Northeast Florida. The yellow pollen from oak and pine trees is brutal. They will definitely cause bigger more powerful hurricanes.The yellow seeds them early if it's too warm.Nevermind the 1935 hurricane that hit with 185 mph winds. That one still has the record.
Mixing facts with bullshit... It's the new science.
Mixing facts with bullshit... It's the new science.
...**** another March day of 80+ degree weather in Northeast Florida. The yellow pollen from oak and pine trees is brutal. They will definitely cause bigger more powerful hurricanes.The yellow seeds them early if it's too warm.Nevermind the 1935 hurricane that hit with 185 mph winds. That one still has the record.
Mixing facts with bullshit... It's the new science.
You know what causes increased yellow pollen? Global warming.
Know what causes the equally-destructive decreased yellow pollen? You guessed it - global warming.
Know what causes high temperatures, low temperatures, drought, flooding. cloudy conditions, clear skies, high humidity and low humidity? GLOBAL WARMING!
And do you know what causes global warming? Your SUV, climate murderer.
You know what causes global warming? Liberalism.
You know what causes liberalism? Global warming.
Sortal like the chicken and the egg.
Last edited:
Chickens cause global warming, and higher temperatures are harder of people of color other than white, racist.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 21,225
- Reaction score
- 23,605
- Points
- 113
Wimmings, they gots a better chance if they are wimmings ...
But then again, there are a bunch of qualified Dems available of all sexes and descriptions.
It's a complete freakshow of the mentally ill,clinically ill with brain damage and mental illness, sexual deviates,theives, complete ignorance,liars, deep political corruption,theft,treason,murder,obstruction....
They are just beginning to eat their own S4E...maybe fun to watch.
Biden Admin Is Placing Undercover Federal Agents At Universities.
The Enforcement Office of Federal Student Aid (FSA) will use “secret shoppers” to ensure that higher education institutions are complying with federal laws regarding financial aid, recruitment and enrollment and that they are not misleading or preying on students, the announcement reads. The agents, posed as students at the institutions, will identify any “misrepresentations” in several aspects that colleges and universities advertise to recruit and retain students including “transferability of credits, job placement rates, completion and withdrawal rates, graduates’ future earning potential, career services, the cost of attendance, the amount of federal student aid, and accreditation status.”Anybody wanna bet on Harvard being included....no ?.......Yale then.? OK how bout them sleazy technical schools ?
I think it's due to wind turbines screwing up the low level wind patterns which obviously then has an effect on mid and upper level patterns.
Only the white chickens cause problems.
Similar threads
