• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Trump needs to focus on jobs

CharlesDavenport

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2014
Messages
9,583
Reaction score
5,866
Points
113
How will Hillary claim to create them, and how he will allow the private sector to create them.

He needs to draw a bright line there, like he did with immigration.

Every tax dollar that "creates" a government job prevents three private sector jobs.
 
I agree.

Jobs, Building the Wall, which means less crime and drugs, and correcting international mistakes that Obama made.

Regarding jobs, globalization has taken away from the USA worker. This message should really resonate well in some swing states like Ohio, and Pennsylvania.

He should also challenge Hillary Clinton that he'll release his audit information if she releases

Put down the twitter account and start talking the above.

For a new twist, perhaps Trump can narrow down his VP pick to 3 people and have a round table discussion with them on air.
 
How has globalization taken away from the US worker? Globalization means businesses have 7 billion potential customers,
nationalization means businesses would be limited to 300 million potential customers.
 
Nah - he's doing fine right where he is - issues don't matter right now, keep stepping up the pressure on Hillary, wear her down - she's cracking, weakening - keep hammering her, she's falling apart


Another Huma Hairball? Medically unfit to be President?

ixhz9li.gif



HILLARY CLINTON COUGHING FIT RETURNS IN CINCINNATI SPEEC
H

Amidst a speech railing against Donald Trump Monday morning, Hillary Clinton’s infamous coughing habit made a comeback.

While calling for providing all Americans access to broadband Internet, Clinton broke out into a familiar coughing fit. "We are going to connect every home to high-speed broadband so they can get into the global marketplace," she said before being overcome with coughs.

"And we are going to fight climate change by making America the clean energy superpower of the 21st century," Clinton continued before coughing again.

Clinton’s supporters helped drown out with the coughing with chants of “Hillary! Hillary!”

The frequency of Clinton's coughing fits has led many to speculate about whether she's suffering from an unannounced health condition.

https://news.grabien.com/story.php?id=384
 
Full transcript: Donald Trump's jobs plan speech

It is great to be here. I'd like to thank Alumisource and all the amazing workers here for hosting us.

Today, I am going to talk about how to Make America Wealthy Again.

We are thirty miles from Steel City. Pittsburgh played a central role in building our nation.

The legacy of Pennsylvania steelworkers lives in the bridges, railways and skyscrapers that make up our great American landscape.

But our workers' loyalty was repaid with betrayal.

Our politicians have aggressively pursued a policy of globalization - moving our jobs, our wealth and our factories to Mexico and overseas.

Globalization has made the financial elite who donate to politicians very wealthy. But it has left millions of our workers with nothing but poverty and heartache.

When subsidized foreign steel is dumped into our markets, threatening our factories, the politicians do nothing.

For years, they watched on the sidelines as our jobs vanished and our communities were plunged into depression-level unemployment.

Many of these areas have still never recovered.

Our politicians took away from the people their means of making a living and supporting their families.

Skilled craftsmen and tradespeople and factory workers have seen the jobs they loved shipped thousands of miles away.

Many Pennsylvania towns once thriving and humming are now in a state despair.

This wave of globalization has wiped out our middle class.

It doesn't have to be this way. We can turn it all around - and we can turn it around fast.

But if we're going to deliver real change, we're going to have to reject the campaign of fear and intimidation being pushed by powerful corporations, media elites, and political dynasties.

The people who rigged the system for their benefit will do anything - and say anything - to keep things exactly as they are.

The people who rigged the system are supporting Hillary Clinton because they know as long as she is in charge nothing will ever change.

The inner cities will remain poor.

The factories will remain closed.

The borders will remain open.

The special interests will remain firmly in control.

Hillary Clinton and her friends in global finance want to scare America into thinking small - and they want to scare the American people out of voting for a better future.

My campaign has the opposite message.

I want you to imagine how much better your life can be if we start believing in America again.

I want you to imagine how much better our future can be if we declare independence from the elites who've led us to one financial and foreign policy disaster after another.

Our friends in Britain recently voted to take back control of their economy, politics and borders.

I was on the right side of that issue - with the people - while Hillary, as always, stood with the elites, and both she and president Obama predicted that one wrong.

Now it's time for the American people to take back their future.

That's the choice we face. We can either give in to Hillary Clinton's campaign of fear, or we can choose to Believe In America.

We lost our way when we stopped believing in our country.

America became the world's dominant economy by becoming the world's dominant producer.

The wealth this created was shared broadly, creating the biggest middle class the world had ever known.

But then America changed its policy from promoting development in America, to promoting development in other nations.

We allowed foreign countries to subsidize their goods, devalue their currencies, violate their agreements, and cheat in every way imaginable.

Trillions of our dollars and millions of our jobs flowed overseas as a result.

I have visited cities and towns across this country where a third or even half of manufacturing jobs have been wiped out in the last 20 years.

Today, we import nearly $800 billion more in goods than we export.

This is not some natural disaster. It is politician-made disaster.

It is the consequence of a leadership class that worships globalism over Americanism.

This is a direct affront to our Founding Fathers, who wanted America to be strong, independent and free.

Our Founding Fathers Understood Trade

George Washington said that "the promotion of domestic manufactur[ing] will be among the first consequences to flow from an energetic government.”

Alexander Hamilton spoke frequently of the "expediency of encouraging manufactur[ing] in the United States." The first Republican President, Abraham Lincoln, warned that: "The abandonment of the protective policy by the American government… must produce want and ruin among our people."

Our original Constitution did not even have an income tax. Instead, it had tariffs - emphasizing taxation of foreign, not domestic, production.

Yet today, 240 years after the Revolution, we have turned things completely upside-down.

We tax and regulate and restrict our companies to death, then we allow foreign countries that cheat to export their goods to us tax-free.

As a result, we have become more dependent on foreign countries than ever before.

Ladies and Gentlemen, it’s time to declare our economic independence once again.

That means reversing two of the worst legacies of the Clinton years.

America has lost nearly one-third of its manufacturing jobs since 1997 - even as the country has increased its population by 50 million people.

At the center of this catastrophe are two trade deals pushed by Bill and Hillary Clinton.

First, the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA. Second, China's entry into the World Trade Organization.

NAFTA was the worst trade deal in history, and China's entrance into the World Trade Organization has enabled the greatest jobs theft in history.

It was Bill Clinton who signed NAFTA in 1993, and Hillary Clinton who supported it.

It was also Bill Clinton who lobbied for China's disastrous entry into the World Trade Organization, and Hillary Clinton who backed that terrible agreement.

Then, as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton stood by idly while China cheated on its currency, added another trillion dollars to our trade deficits, and stole hundreds of billions of dollars in our intellectual property.

The city of Pittsburgh, and the State of Pennsylvania, have lost one-third of their manufacturing jobs since the Clintons put China into the WTO.

Fifty thousand factories across America have shut their doors in that time.

Almost half of our entire manufacturing trade deficit in goods with the world is the result of trade with China.

It was also Hillary Clinton, as Secretary of State, who shoved us into a job-killing deal with South Korea in 2012.

As reported by the Economic Policy Institute in May, this deal doubled our trade deficit with South Korea and destroyed nearly 100,000 American jobs.

As Bernie Sanders said, Hillary Clinton "Voted for virtually every trade agreement that has cost the workers of this country millions of jobs.”

Trade reform, and the negotiation of great trade deals, is the quickest way to bring our jobs back.

To understand why trade reform creates jobs, we need to understand how all nations grow and prosper.

Massive trade deficits subtract directly from our Gross Domestic Product.

From 1947 to 2001 - a span of over five decades - our inflation-adjusted gross domestic product grew at a rate of 3.5%.

However, since 2002 - the year after we fully opened our markets to Chinese imports - that GDP growth rate has been cut almost in half.

What does this mean for Americans? For every one percent of GDP growth we fail to generate in any given year, we also fail to create over one million jobs.

America's "job creation deficit" due to slower growth since 2002 is well over 20 million jobs - and that's just about the number of jobs our country needs right now to put America back to work at decent wages.

The Transpacific-Partnership is the greatest danger yet.

The TPP would be the death blow for American manufacturing.

It would give up all of our economic leverage to an international commission that would put the interests of foreign countries above our own.

It would further open our markets to aggressive currency cheaters. It would make it easier for our trading competitors to ship cheap subsidized goods into U.S. markets - while allowing foreign countries to continue putting barriers in front of our exports.

The TPP would lower tariffs on foreign cars, while leaving in place the foreign practices that keep American cars from being sold overseas. The TPP even created a backdoor for China to supply car parts for automobiles made in Mexico.

The agreement would also force American workers to compete directly against workers from Vietnam, one of the lowest wage countries on Earth.

Not only will the TPP undermine our economy, but it will undermine our independence.

The TPP creates a new international commission that makes decisions the American people can't veto.

These commissions are great Hillary Clinton’s Wall Street funders who can spend vast amounts of money to influence the outcomes.

It should be no surprise then that Hillary Clinton, according to Bloomberg, took a “leading part in drafting the Trans-Pacific Partnership”.

She praised or pushed the TPP on 45 separate occasions, and even called it the “gold standard”.

Hillary Clinton was totally for the TPP just a short while ago, but when she saw my stance, which is totally against, she was shamed into saying she would be against it too – but have no doubt, she will immediately approve it if it is put before her, guaranteed.

She will do this just as she has betrayed American workers for Wall Street throughout her career.

Here’s how it would go: she would make a small token change, declare the pact fixed, and ram it through.

That’s why Hillary is now only saying she has problems with the TPP “in its current form,” – ensuring that she can rush to embrace it again at her earliest opportunity.

If the media doesn’t believe me, I have a challenge for you. Ask Hillary Clinton if she is willing to withdraw from the TPP her first day in office and unconditionally rule out its passage in any form.

There is no way to “fix” the TPP. We need bilateral trade deals. We do not need to enter into another massive international agreement that ties us up and binds us down.

A Trump Administration will change our failed trade policy - quickly

Here are 7 steps I would pursue right away to bring back our jobs.

One: I am going to withdraw the United States from the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which has not yet been ratified.

Two: I'm going to appoint the toughest and smartest trade negotiators to fight on behalf of American workers.

Three: I'm going to direct the Secretary of Commerce to identify every violation of trade agreements a foreign country is currently using to harm our workers. I will then direct all appropriate agencies to use every tool under American and international law to end these abuses.

Four: I'm going tell our NAFTA partners that I intend to immediately renegotiate the terms of that agreement to get a better deal for our workers. And I don't mean just a little bit better, I mean a lot better. If they do not agree to a renegotiation, then I will submit notice under Article 2205 of the NAFTA agreement that America intends to withdraw from the deal.

Five: I am going to instruct my Treasury Secretary to label China a currency manipulator. Any country that devalues their currency in order to take advantage of the United States will be met with sharply

Six: I am going to instruct the U.S. Trade Representative to bring trade cases against China, both in this country and at the WTO. China's unfair subsidy behavior is prohibited by the terms of its entrance to the WTO, and I intend to enforce those rules.

Seven: If China does not stop its illegal activities, including its theft of American trade secrets, I will use every lawful presidential power to remedy trade disputes, including the application of tariffs consistent with Section 201 and 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 and Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962.

President Reagan deployed similar trade measures when motorcycle and semiconductor imports threatened U.S. industry. His tariff on Japanese motorcycles was 45% and his tariff to shield America’s semiconductor industry was 100%.

Hillary Clinton, and her campaign of fear, will try to spread the lie that these actions will start a trade war. She has it completely backwards.

Hillary Clinton unleashed a trade war against the American worker when she supported one terrible trade deal after another – from NAFTA to China to South Korea.

A Trump Administration will end that war by getting a fair deal for the American people.

The era of economic surrender will finally be over.

A new era of prosperity will finally begin.

America will be independent once more.

Under a Trump Presidency, the American worker will finally have a President who will protect them and fight for them.

We will stand up to trade cheating anywhere and everywhere it threatens an American job.

We will make America the best place in the world to start a business, hire workers, and open a factory.

This includes massive tax reform to lift the crushing burdens on American workers and businesses.

We will also get rid of wasteful rules and regulations which are destroying our job creation capacity.

Many people think that these regulations are an even greater impediment than the fact that we are one of the highest taxed nations in the world.

We are also going to fully capture America’s tremendous energy capacity. This will create vast profits for our workers and begin reducing our deficit. Hillary Clinton wants to shut down energy production and shut down the mines.

A Trump Administration will also ensure that we start using American steel for American infrastructure.

Just like the American steel from Pennsylvania that built the Empire State building.

It will be American steel that will fortify American's crumbling bridges.

It will be American steel that sends our skyscrapers soaring into the sky.

It will be American steel that rebuilds our inner cities.

It will be American hands that remake this country, and it will be American energy - mined from American resources - that powers this country.

It will be American workers who are hired to do the job.

We are going to put American-produced steel back into the backbone of our country. This alone will create massive numbers of jobs.

On trade, on immigration, on foreign policy, we are going to put America First again.

We are going to make America wealthy again.

We are going to reject Hillary Clinton's politics of fear, futility, and incompetence.

We are going to embrace the possibilities of change.

It is time to believe in the future.

It is time to believe in each other.

It is time to Believe In America.

This Is How We Are Going To Make America Great Again – For All Americans.

We Are Going To Make America Great Again For Everyone – Greater Than Ever Before.

Thank you.


http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/full-transcript-trump-job-plan-speech-224891
-------------------------------


Not backing down. Gonna cram Free Trade right up her assgry.

Schlonged! Yinzers are cheering.
 
It's a good speech, and it is compelling.

I've also read that Trump has owned over 500 companies in his career.

Did you know that it takes less than 40 seconds to discover that many of those companies rely on foreign labor and resources for their success?

I assume he intends to shut those all down? I really do find his speech compelling. I just have a hard time reconciling it with his business history. See, he has a record of working with foreign labor... How does that support American jobs? I'm unclear. Has he had a recent revelation? Has he suddenly determined that his previous practices (which have obviously been successful from a business and financial standpoint) are detrimental to America?

So has Trump been unpatriotic in his business practices and now he wishes to remedy that? I'm getting some mixes messages. Cause, honestly I really ******* hate Clinton. But ALL we got on the other hand is Trump who honestly is kinda not awesome. I mean, he sounds good in his speeches and all, but really - less than 40 seconds on google and you find that he uses foreign labor all over the place in his business dealings? But he wants to get American away from foreign labor?

And would Richard Nixon be his role model, by chance?

I know, I sound like an ******* here. But honestly I WANT to like Trump. It's just this kind of **** that makes it hard for me. Perhaps he could have said "We need to stop doing what's best for the bottom line and start doing whats best for the borderline". I mean, it's kinda cheesy but at least there's some credibility there. At least he's owning up to the fact that, ya, he was a douchebag who DID exactly what he's saying America needs to stop doing. But how can he expect people to take him seriously when he's telling us all to "Do what he says, not what he does."?
 
I think the issue with Trump on this subject is that his history is that of a businessman who used the system as it existed, and now is playing politician, and puts him in a conflict of interest.

Can he do what he thinks is best for the country, and protect his business interests at the same time? Certainly not if he relies on the cheap labor in Asia to turn a profit, while at the same time demonizing that practice from a political standpoint.

His only choice is to lead by example and bring his businesses to US soil, and implement regulations that serve as an incentive for other US based companies to follow suit.
 
Last edited:
Wig,

I don't think Trump is the answer but in his defense he does property development all over the world. Kind of hard to hire guys in New Jersey to build an apartment building in Thailand.
 
Trump like all smart businessmen took full advantage of systems and tax codes in place. i dont fault him one bit. Every one of us would do the same thing. I know I try to pay as little taxes each year as possible. Why should he have been doing any different?
 
How has globalization taken away from the US worker? Globalization means businesses have 7 billion potential customers,
nationalization means businesses would be limited to 300 million potential customers.

Cheap third world labor means things imported here can cost less but they can't afford the stuff we make.
 
We can all cry about the global economy but with NAFTA or without NAFTA it's not going away. Why anyone thinks imposing trade barriers is going to help this situation I don't know. All it will create is retaliation. We aren't going to force the world into buying goods produced at expensive American labor rates. It ain't gonna happen. Please give up your dreams of a day when Americans all work in steel mills and clothing factories again. Let's focus on creating high tech and high skilled jobs and workers capable of filling them rather than trying to compete with $2.00/day factory workers.

Trump's railing against free trade shows a fundamental lack of understanding of global economics.

http://www.nationalreview.com/us-trade-trump-gets-it-wrong

Trade is one of those issues about which the strength of people’s opinions tends to be the converse of their level of knowledge. With that in mind, it is worth revisiting a few facts. U.S. manufacturing has not been undermined by NAFTA. In real (inflation-adjusted) terms, U.S. manufacturing output today is about 68 percent higher than it was before NAFTA came into effect. Real manufacturing output today is nearly twice what it was in 1987, when NAFTA’s predecessor, the Canada–U.S. Free Trade Agreement, was negotiated. Manufacturing output per man-hour has skyrocketed as investments in information technology and automation pay off, which is the main reason a smaller share of the work force is employed in manufacturing even as output continues its steady climb. Fewer people work in our factories today because we’ve gotten better at running them.

The United States does run large trade deficits, though the cause and consequence of these is generally misunderstood. (Daniel Griswold’s 1998 analysis, though inevitably dated, remains an excellent primer.) For many years, nearly half of our trade deficit came from imports of a single product: oil, not Hondas or cheap flip-flops from China. Oil accounted for 40.5 percent of the trade deficit from 2000 to 2012. Thanks to fracking, the United States is today a very substantial petroleum producer, but federal law prohibits most crude-oil exports. A recently negotiated swap of U.S. light crude for Mexican heavy crude required presidential dispensation, which gives an indication of how unfree that market is. What that means is that one-way trade in the commodity that has been an important driver of our trade deficit is not the result of protectionist policies abroad but of protectionist policies at home, a federal ban on oil exports enacted in 1975 to keep our precious fluids out of the hands of wily foreigners.

Annual U.S. exports have been setting new records for years, and did so again in 2014. The largest share of U.S. exports go to Canada and Mexico, respectively, with the third-largest market for U.S. exports being China. China consumes about twice as much in U.S. exports as does our next-largest overseas market, Japan, and far more than any other country down the list. The United States runs trade surpluses with relatively protectionist countries such as Brazil. What drives bilateral trade deficits between the United States and other countries is not, for the most part, trade policy, but simple supply and demand. The United States exports a lot of farm commodities and industrial products, along with a great deal of very high-end goods. The effects of that are mainly psychological: We see a lot of goods on the shelves marked “Made in China” but few overseas goods marked “Made in the USA,” because what the United States exports isn’t consumer goods, for the most part. But you’ll find American robotics in German automobile factories and American cotton in Vietnamese textile plants.

Because of our size (we sometimes forget that we’re the third-most-populous country on Earth and account for 22 percent of the planet’s economy), we tend to run relatively large trade deficits or surpluses as a share of trade with smaller countries, big deficits with Saudi Arabia, and big surpluses with the Netherlands. And we tend to do lots of business with our immediate neighbors and with other large and diverse economies. Among that group, we generally send more exports to richer countries and fewer exports to poorer countries, for the obvious reason that poor people are “undercapitalized” when it comes to buying $50,000 Ford pickup trucks or Boeing jets. The poorer countries do buy a lot of U.S.-produced food: At $152 billion a year, our annual farm exports slightly exceed our automobile imports. And about $30 billion of those farm exports go to China; Beijing may try to game trading terms, but hungry people are hungry people

For the same reason that the United States tends to excel in high-value exports, foreign companies have often found it amenable to make some high-end goods for the American market, and other markets, in the United States. That is not because we have protectionist policies encouraging that, but because it saves on shipping costs and because we have a highly skilled work force. There aren’t any Chinese companies making $1 plastic water-guns to sell at Wal-Mart in the United States, but Mercedes-Benz makes automobiles here and Leica makes high-end optics here (not the famous cameras, but rifle scopes — know your market!), and not because American labor is cheap. Indeed, the race-to-the-bottom analysis is deeply flawed; with the notable exception of China, where wages have steadily climbed but are relatively low, global investment tends to be concentrated on high-wage countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and the countries of Western Europe. The next time somebody tries to sell you a race-to-the-bottom story, ask why they don’t make the BMW 7-Series in Haiti. Conversely, because Ford sells the Focus all over the world (it sells twice as many in China as it does in the United States), it has made them in places as different as Michigan, Portugal, Germany, and the Philippines. Mexico has made great strides in automobile manufacturing — but not because it has pursued a protectionist agenda. The opposite is the case: While the United States pursues the occasional free-trade deal in its sluggish and desultory fashion, Mexico has closed some 45 free-trade accords over the past few decades, which means that builders in Mexico can export duty-free to virtually any significant market in the world except China. Meanwhile, the United States languishes: By most estimates, the United States has a trade environment inferior to Sweden’s, and it has a higher corporate tax rate than Sweden does, too.

NAFTA has had a modest positive impact on the United States economy: positive in that it has increased both output and employment in the United States, modest because there already was a great deal of North American trade absent NAFTA. The treaty is not without its defects. My colleague Jonah Goldberg has written that an ideal free-trade treaty would be one sentence long: “There shall be free trade between . . . ” But NAFTA, like our other trade accords, is more Rube Goldberg than Jonah Goldberg, an overly complex piece of political machinery. But it has, despite its defects, lowered trade barriers, to the benefit of all three parties.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/us-trade-trump-gets-it-wrong
 
Dont believe the sham support articles for NAFTA... the mexican minimum wage is 4 dollars a day... there is a reason the majority of stuff not made in china comes from mexico these days... force them to enact a minimum wage that is at least 80% of ours and watch as not only some of the better jobs come back to our country, but the immigration issue resolves itself as well. Most of the cost savings from using cheap labor in Mexico (and China) are not passed on to the consumer, but pocketed by companies and middle men who get the items here. end that process and it fixes a ton...

Bear in mind free trade is a good thing as long as people arent being exploited, and in a handful of cases they are... there is a reason China and mexico have such huge exports here while europe and canada do not....

Human rights, Fair pay, safe products, enviromentally safe procedures, and legal and fair patent and copyright treatment... these should all be key in permitting free trade with this country... significant lack in any department should result in tarrifs and exclusions to make it fair to every other country who practice these....
 
Trump is talking about things that ordinary politicians have been sweeping under the rug for decades. If you can't see that, all your nitpicking is belong to us.

Death to political correctness!
 
Dont believe the sham support articles for NAFTA... the mexican minimum wage is 4 dollars a day... there is a reason the majority of stuff not made in china comes from mexico these days... force them to enact a minimum wage that is at least 80% of ours and watch as not only some of the better jobs come back to our country, but the immigration issue resolves itself as well. Most of the cost savings from using cheap labor in Mexico (and China) are not passed on to the consumer, but pocketed by companies and middle men who get the items here. end that process and it fixes a ton...

Bear in mind free trade is a good thing as long as people arent being exploited, and in a handful of cases they are... there is a reason China and mexico have such huge exports here while europe and canada do not....

Human rights, Fair pay, safe products, enviromentally safe procedures, and legal and fair patent and copyright treatment... these should all be key in permitting free trade with this country... significant lack in any department should result in tarrifs and exclusions to make it fair to every other country who practice these....

You're one of those people who think money to pay minimum wage comes from the money fairy I see. "Force" Mexico and China to pay people what we pay them and you are not going to see better working conditions for Mexicans and Chinese...you're going to see a lot of unemployed Mexicans and Chinese. And exports exploding from India and Bangladesh. Our attempts to maniuplate global markets won't work. They will only cause rising prices for our consumers and decreases in exports due to retaliatory tariffs. Ask Stalin and Chavez how well protectionism worked for their economies.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/432462/donald-trump-protectionist-tariffs-hurt-working-class
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agriculture_in_the_United_States

The amount of jobs lost thru trade is miniscule compared to jobs being lost thru improved technology. In 1870 50% of the US labor force was in agriculture and today it is
less than 2%. Is it because the work went elsewhere? No. Advances in machinery, technology and science sent the need for labor sinking and farming productivity
soaring. The same is happening in manufacturing today. Nike has developed a machine that makes tennis shoes with zero labor needed. Capitalism's goal is to eliminate
as much labor as possible. Starting a trade war will just send jobs to other countries and inflation soaring here.
 
It's not just about cost of making something. Trump can't eliminate the search for cheap labor.

But governments in these "cheap labor markets" are contributing to the problem. They manipulate their currencies. They tariff OUR exports of raw materials and energy that they need (thus increasing the cost they re-sell it to us back).

The cost of manufacturing is not just labor costs. It's also taxes, stability, labor productivity, corruption, transport and a host of other factors. Trump's not advocating a minimum wage or world-wide wage increase. He just wants to control government intervention that further contributes to lack of factory opportunities in America.

If it was just about labor costs, nothing would be made here. But that's not the case at all. There are plenty of things that COULD be made here competitively if not for China, SE Asia and Mexico and their governments scamming the system.
 
It's not just about cost of making something. Trump can't eliminate the search for cheap labor.

But governments in these "cheap labor markets" are contributing to the problem. They manipulate their currencies. They tariff OUR exports of raw materials and energy that they need (thus increasing the cost they re-sell it to us back).

The cost of manufacturing is not just labor costs. It's also taxes, stability, labor productivity, corruption, transport and a host of other factors. Trump's not advocating a minimum wage or world-wide wage increase. He just wants to control government intervention that further contributes to lack of factory opportunities in America.

If it was just about labor costs, nothing would be made here. But that's not the case at all. There are plenty of things that COULD be made here competitively if not for China, SE Asia and Mexico and their governments scamming the system.

It's just not true. Just because Trump says something is happening doesn't make it so.

http://thefederalist.com/2016/01/20...d-trump-says-about-trade-with-china-is-wrong/
 
The government intervening in free markets usually has unintended and negative consequences. Trying to alter people's behaviors by taxing and regulating generally results in economic damage, not economic benefit.

When are we going to learn this?
 
Top