• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Why Biden?

Youtube now censoring the new Veritas video on Colorado Dems

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAhKMi6DexA

The censorship of Project Veritas is vile and the most anti-American tactic imaginable. Project Veritas gets video and audio of public officials, or those working for and leading taxpayer-funded operations, showing grotesque abuses. Selling fetus parts, lying about medical care legislation, lying about spending, admitting lying to the voters, misusing taxpayer funds, and on and on.

And these stupid platforms suppress THAT speech?!? Jee-zus, their work is supposed to be the reason for our press. And these idiots will allow any moronic conspiracy theory by some idiot about zombies and space aliens while suppressing speech that the First Amendment was specifically designed to foster and protect??
 
Going to have to do better than Hunter with drugs that's not exactly earth shattering. Should be interesting to see what they have. Supposedly they got this in september why wait so long? Kinda late to throw it out there now

How about this: Creepy Joe made Hunter pay him half of the salaries that he got from Ukraine and China. Joe is corrupt as hell. He, like all the swamp dwellers, used their positions to get rich instead of doing what was best for America.

Hunter Text Message To Naomi Biden:
“Unlike Pop I Won’t Make You Give Me Half Your Salary”
The BIDEN CRIME FAMILY’S Payoff Scheme…
Rudy Guiliani Reveals New Text Message From The Hunter Biden Hard Drive…
 
5vu8ewzupat51.jpg
 
what a **** show this election has become...

Very sad to say, but it looks like our once great country is going to have an even harder landing than the Roman Empire did...
 
So answer me some questions...

If the Ruskies hacked the laptop... wouldn’t that be back in December when it was turned over to the FBI? Well before he was even favored to win the nomination?

Also wouldn’t that mean they had seriously comprising photos and video on Biden? I mean those weren’t faked... So why freely give up that kind of leverage to back a guy that may or may not win?

Also couldn’t biden just open his books and show that money didn’t get passed to him from those orgs and countries?

Also why is it ok to censor the story about the laptop as a conspiracy theory despite hard evidence but not censor the conspiracy theory abut russian hacking that has zero proof and is pure conjecture


I don’t need answers really... i just want the Libs browsing this site to honestly and unbiasedly look at this one scenario and Think about what is really the best precedents to set forth here... not what is best for their party or agenda... whats best for tge ideal of America

Because they better well understand that sooner or later the shoe will be on the other foot and big tech and the neoglobalists will be opposed to something they hold dear and those slippery slopes burn bad when you are sliding down them...
 
So answer me some questions...

If the Ruskies hacked the laptop... wouldn’t that be back in December when it was turned over to the FBI? Well before he was even favored to win the nomination?

Also wouldn’t that mean they had seriously comprising photos and video on Biden? I mean those weren’t faked... So why freely give up that kind of leverage to back a guy that may or may not win?

Also couldn’t biden just open his books and show that money didn’t get passed to him from those orgs and countries?

Also why is it ok to censor the story about the laptop as a conspiracy theory despite hard evidence but not censor the conspiracy theory abut russian hacking that has zero proof and is pure conjecture


I don’t need answers really... i just want the Libs browsing this site to honestly and unbiasedly look at this one scenario and Think about what is really the best precedents to set forth here... not what is best for their party or agenda... whats best for tge ideal of America

Because they better well understand that sooner or later the shoe will be on the other foot and big tech and the neoglobalists will be opposed to something they hold dear and those slippery slopes burn bad when you are sliding down them...
If you have that kind of dirt on Biden, you keep it hidden. You help him win the presidency then, if he wins, you own him.
 
Uh oh 21Tard, there goes your millions$. Joe is an economic genius.

JOE BIDENPublished 20 mins ago
Biden's plan to overhaul 401(k) tax breaks could force some companies to cut retirement savings benefits
'Tens of millions of people' could lose their plans as a result of the proposed change, one industry expert estimated
Facebook
Twitter
Comments
Print
Email
By Megan HenneyFOXBusiness

Banks, brokerage firms telling clients not to worry about Biden tax hikes if he’s elected: Gasparino
FOX Business’ Charlie Gasparino gives an update on how Wall Street is feeling about a potential Biden presidency.

A frequently overlooked part of Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden's platform would upend the traditional tax preferences of retirement accounts like 401(k) plans — a change that industry experts warned could force some small companies to cut those benefits.

Biden has vowed to convert the current deductibility of traditional retirement contributions into matching refundable credits for 401(k)s, IRAs and others.

The proposal from the former vice president is intended to level the playing the field of tax deferral in traditional retirement accounts, with the intent of boosting saving among low-income earners. But industry experts cautioned that by reducing the benefits that higher earners receive, the Biden campaign may have increased the likelihood of businesses abandoning those retirement benefits altogether.

"If you take the tax deduction away and reduce the tax benefit, without also addressing the nondiscrimination rules, you've blown up the bargain," Brian Graff, the CEO of the American Retirement Association, told FOX Business.

HOW A BIDEN PRESIDENCY COULD CHANGE YOUR TAX BILL


That's because employers who make contributions to a 401(k) must offer that same benefit to their workers. Under Biden's plan, business owners would have to reduce their own tax benefit, while continuing to contribute on behalf of their employees, which is expensive, particularly during a pandemic.

Some of those bosses — traditionally the higher-income earners — may lack the incentive to offer those retirement accounts if their tax benefit is slashed, Graff said.

"When you mess up that bargain, you're disincentivizing those small business owners from having that plan anymore," he said. "Not only is it unfair to those small business owners, it's going to reduce the likelihood that they're going to offer those benefits to their employees. And that's particularly acute in a challenging time like now."

"Tens of millions of people" could lose their plans as a result of the proposed change, Graff estimated. Small businesses, which would be the most affected by the new rules, employ roughly 58.9 million people, or 47.5% of the nation's workforce.
 
https://neonnettle.com/news/11766-biden-s-cancer-charity-caught-funneling-millions-to-executives

Biden's Cancer Charity Caught Funneling Millions to Executives
Almost 65 percent of the Biden Cancer Initiative's money went into staffers' pockets
By: Jay Greenberg |@NeonNettle on 25th June 2020 @ 5.00pm

Joe Biden's cancer charity has been caught funneling millions of dollars into the pockets of its executives while doing very little to fight the deadly disease, according to reports.

Since its founding in 2017, financial records have revealed that almost two-thirds of the money spent by the Biden Cancer Initiative went toward six-figure salaries for top executives and staff "compensation."

The figure dwarfs the amount that the "non-profit" group spent on efforts to eradicate cancer.

The Biden Cancer Initiative (BCI) is one of several non-profits former Vice President Biden created following his tenure in the White House.

Despite its seemingly noble clams, however, BCI paid top executives lavishly, with salaries accounting for nearly 65 percent of the organization's total expenditures.

This salary budget far exceeds the 25 percent spend on administrative overhead and fundraising costs combined that charity watchdogs recommend for non-profits.

The nonprofit raised and spent $4.8 million over its two years in operation, its 2017 and 2018 tax forms show, according to the Washington Free Beacon.

Slightly more than $3 million of that amount went to salaries, compensation, and benefits.

At the same time, the group spent just $1.7 million on all of its other expenses.

A bulk of this cash—$740,000—was poured into conferences, conventions, and meetings.It did not cut a single grant to any other group or foundation during its two-year run.

An analysis of nonprofits by Charity Navigator, which rates charities for effectiveness, found that mid-to-large-sized nonprofits paid their chief executives an average salary of $126,000 per year—far less than what the Biden Cancer Initiative paid its president, Greg Simon.

Simon pocketed $224,539 in 2017 and $429,850 in 2018.Charity Navigator's primary criterion for rating charities is whether they "spend at least 75% of their expenses directly on their programs."
The Biden cancer group's financial disclosures may raise new questions about whether the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee allowed associates to profit off their access to him.

Before going on to receive six-figure salaries from the Biden Cancer Initiative, Simon and the initiative's vice president, Danielle Carnival, previously worked for the Obama administration's Cancer Moonshot program.

Biden's son Hunter Biden received $50,000 a month to sit on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma despite an apparent lack of qualifications.

James Biden, Joe Biden's brother, joined a construction firm in 2010 that later won a $1.5 billion contract to build homes in Iraq while Biden oversaw Iraq policy.

Biden's presidential campaign has been plagued with questions about Hunter's and James's financial activities.Simon was only one of several highly paid Biden Cancer Initiative executives.

Carnival was also compensated handsomely, collecting a combined $391,897 in 2017 and 2018.Simon and Carnival were the only two individuals paid both years by the nonprofit.

During its second year in operation, the initiative added others to its payroll, including director of communications Cecilia Arradaza (who was paid $171,012), director of engagement Lisa Simms Booth ($197,544), and director of science policy Catherine Young ($170,904).Biden stepped away from the initiative and his other nonprofits shortly before entering the presidential race to avoid conflicts of interest.

Many of the health companies that Biden touted during his time with the nonprofit have financial and regulatory interests with the federal government. Simon told the Associated Press in 2019 that many of the group's attempted partnerships with medical organizations were "not successful."

The Biden Cancer Initiative was launched to continue the agenda of the Cancer Moonshot program, which President Obama created toward the end of his second term in hopes of accelerating research in the field.

Biden, whose son Beau died from the disease, led the program with Simon's help.

The nonprofit operated primarily through indirect money pledges from 57 partnerships, which included drug and health insurance companies.The group also pushed for data sharing, patient support, and other medical initiatives.

The Biden campaign did not respond to a request for comment.Simon did not respond to inquiries on the Biden Cancer Initiative's finances and what the group had ultimately achieved before ceasing its operations.
 
Hunter campaigning for dad.



 
Jeffrey "Randy" Toobin?

 
It's kind of funny that your worried about the finances of the candidate (Biden) who released his 2019 tax return paying 300K of taxes on less than a million in gross income and not
concerned with the Billionaire candidate who refuses to release his tax returns. If I were a betting man, I would bet their is more fraud in the Billionaires finances.
 
Top