This is why you cannot have a guy running for President who is completely ignorant of the Constitution, Tibs.
Citizens United said what every sentient being already knew - the first amendment specifically PROHIBITS the government from suppressing political speech.
You have no business telling a non-profit corporation what to do or say or what it will spend relative to political speech. That ruling is so basic and fundamental that only the truly uninformed believe otherwise. Justice Kennedy's majority decision stated the issue this way: "If the First Amendment has any force, it prohibits Congress from fining or jailing citizens, or associations of citizens,
for simply engaging in political speech."
The fact that four United States Supreme Court justices felt otherwise is frankly an embarrassment. What would those four justices say about the right to free speech and a titty bar? But those idiots would restrict spending on POLITICAL SPEECH???
And Tibs, the corporations have no right to give the money to the candidates. Those contributions are still subject to campaign finance restrictions.
If you want to start restricting political speech, I guess you are all in favor of the Trump proposal relative to defamation law.
How about these facts, Tibs?
The United States spends less on national defense than it does on social security or medicare, and now spends 62% of its annual budget on payments on entitlements and on interest for the debt and 16% on national defense - entitlements are 3 1/2 times the portion of the Federal budget as national defense.
Additionally, the Fed spends about 4% of the GDP on defense, a rate that is lower than it has been since before WWII. This graph shows that Uncle Bernie's meme about "spending so much on the military while children starve" is, as is true with basically every Uncle Bernie meme, absolute fiction:
You want to know the difference? The Constitution actually calls for the Federal government to spend on national defense.