I get it. Breitbart to you is what's considered investigative reporting.
You're quite good at this Liberal labeling business. Breitbart, HuffPo, Vox, all the same. As with so many of us with degrees and high level education, I validate among many sources. As you yourself claim to.
You look at anything non-MSM as real, more close to the truth than what the major newspapers - tv, papers, internet - are reporting.
No, I look at anything from MSM as 'potentially' corrupt, unlike the bulk of Americans that believe what they are spoon fed.
Journalism in this country has stood strong through time-tested history.
Journalism in this country has never been tested as it is now with persistent media everywhere. You, nor I, have any idea what the media fed us 30 and 50 years ago. There was little way to validate what they told us. Now, it's a different world and journalists are being exposed.
You know how the Michael Brown story would have gone down if not for persistent media don't you? He'd have been a martyr, murdered by a cop. Thanks to cell phone media and internet media, their attempts to white wash that story the way they wanted was prevented.
Thank GOD.
The notion that MSM is skewered, commie-leftist propaganda is pure fiction. If you actually believe that, you really need to get out, look around, travel a little.
Do you
ACTUALLY believe this Tibs? If so, it's you that needs to pull your head from your *** and remove the blinders that you walk around through life wearing.
This just from WikiLeaks:
1. Clinton Staff hosts private “off-the-record cocktail party” with 38 “influential” reporters, journalists, editors, and anchors (from 16 different mainstream media outlets including CNN, NBC, CBS, NYT, MSNBC, & more) with the stated goal of “framing the race.”
2. Donna Brazile (CNN contributor at the time, and current DNC Chairman now) leaked CNN town hall questions to Hillary Clinton’s staff prior to the debate.
3. Clinton campaign and the New York Times coordinating attack strategy against Trump.
4. Glen Thrush, POLITICO’s chief political correspondent and senior staff writer for POLITICO Magazine, sends John Podesta an article for his approval. Writes: “Please don’t share or tell anyone I did this. Tell me if I ****** up anything.”
5. Huffington Post contributor Frank Islam writes to John Podesta in an email titled “My blogs in the Huffington Post”, says “I am committed to make sure she is elected the next president.” “Please let me know if I can be of any service to you.”
6. Clinton staffer “Placing a story” with Politico / New York Times: “place a story with a friendly journalist” “we have a very good relationship with Maggie Haberman of Politico” “we should shape likely leaks in the best light for HRC.”
7. John Podesta receiving drafts of New York Times articles before they’re published.
Clinton staff “placing a story with a friendly at the AP (Matt Lee or Bradley Klapper).”
More media collusion: NYT and AP “helpful” to Clinton campaign.
8. Clinton staff colluding with New York Times and Wall Street Journal to paint Hillary’s economic policies in a “progressive” light.
9. CNBC panelist colluding with John Podesta on what to ask Trump when he calls in for an interview.
10. Clinton staff appearing to control the release times of Associated Press articles.
Or the Washington Post putting 26 reporters on digging up dirt on Donald Trump and absolutely ZERO to investigate Hillary.
NBC's Chuck Todd taking direction directly from the DNC (see WikiLeaks).
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/nov/8/mainstream-media-maligned-10-examples-blatant-bias/
Then there is the entire business of what the MSM chooses to show, vs. what it chooses NOT to show. That is a college thesis in and of itself. Going wall to wall coverage on Trayvon Martin, and providing nearly ZERO coverage on the countless attacks on innocent white civilians by mobs chanting Black Lives Matter (of which there are numerous). Playing little to no attention to Hillary's email scandals, and when they did, to downplay it.
Have a look at MRC, dedicated to watch dogging media bias and coverage. You only need to pay attention for a few days.
Jesus, I could go on for months providing example after example of inaccurate, unbalanced, biased, and incorrect MSM reporting and operation.
For you to defend MSM just shows the lengths to which you will go to be obtuse.
I trust the local newsman, the journalist to report what's out there, what's happening.
Not a single one of us is surprised.
Editors will tidy it up and publish it, ie the truth.
Negative. See above. There are literally thousands of examples of the bias, inaccuracy and corruption that gets past these "editors."
But the truth always emerges, sooner or later.
Thank God for Fox News, internet media, and WikiLeaks, you're right. Eventually we do see the truth.
See, I believe in traditional journalism.The importance of honest, relevant journalism will always be important.
Then you are literally a buffoon. Despite the thousands of examples of how corrupt it's become, you believe in it. Why? Because MSM sings your tune. Tells you the lies you want to believe. And you rationalize away each example of their corruption. There is little honest about a profession that is (per studies) over 94% run by registered Democrats. You simply cannot believe you will get honest reporting when there is a 94% v 6% split between conservative and liberal reporters..do you ???
You guys are enamored by Julian Assange, the recluse hacker yet are willing to throw hundreds of years of American journalism out the window because so-called 'fake news' is being reported.
You sir, are an idiot for ignoring it or rationalizing it away. Not one email produced has been proven to be false. Not one. It exposed MASSIVE corruption and bias. To you? They are still honest. You're a complete joke Tibs.
Don't succumb to crazy conspiracies.
When you can show that the litany of exposed emails are falsified, then your point may carry water. Until then, it's not a conspiracy is it? A conspiracy is when you believe in UFOs, but you really have no proof. We have thousands and thousands of pages of EVIDENCE Tibs. Unarguable examples of corruption. That's not a conspiracy. They are facts.
