• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Covid Vaccine

Again, no data about this "rise" and I have seen articles stating that Australia created a registry to track sudden cardiac deaths, nothing about them seeing a rise, or a sudden rise, or any of the other things you claim. This is a legitimate news source unlike several anti-vax articles you posted, this states nothing about "an increase in reports" or a "rise" or a "sudden rise"...


Ironically there is probably more awareness of this issue recently because of anti-vaxxers seizing on these poor young people's deaths and trying to use them on social media as evidence of dire vaccine side effects. Despite a complete lack of any causal link or correlation.

In the articles about Australia and Britain, it specifically stated doctors are concerned about the sudden rise in SADS deaths. No 'data' was presented. Just that doctors were concerned about it.

The other data I presented, like the Israel study, showed the 25% increase in cardiac arrest incidents in 2021. The insurance mortality data shows the increases in deaths being up to as much as a 40% - rates they have never seen before.

Combine that data with the articles' statements.

Their quotes, not mine: "Doctors baffled by increase in Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS). DOCTORS in Australia are developing the country’s first SADS registry after recent incidents of healthy young people dying from Sudden Adult Death Syndrome."

Not all of the deaths/incidents anomalies are attributable to vaccines. But something is clearly going on and the vaccines should be a part of the investigation.
 
How do you explain the rise in inexplicable cardiac deaths (SADS)? If there is no causal relationship, you just say "ah well, **** happens?"

What is your theory Dr. Flog?
I attribute it to emotional responses to recent mass shootings - like how the husband of the murdered Uvalde teacher “died of a broken heart” a couple days later. Yes, it’s totally baseless since I don’t have any evidence of the individual emotional responses or an explanation of how that would cause death. See how that works?
 
This article sums up my thoughts nearly perfectly.


A strange new medical anomaly has doctors baffled as it sweeps across the country. Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS) is on the rise, and it’s tragically claiming the lives of healthy young adults, sometimes in their sleep.

Essentially, people are dying without displaying any prior sign of illness. They simply do not wake up after going to bed, or collapse during the day.

Reports of SADS have been increasing in recent weeks. A news.com web piece explains that, ‘Sudden Adult Death Syndrome … is an umbrella term to describe unexpected deaths in young people, usually under 40, when a post-mortem can find no obvious cause of death.’

The Melbourne-based Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute hopes to roll out a nation-wide registry to track cases.

‘In our registry, there are approximately 750 cases per year of people aged under 50 in Victoria suddenly having their heart stop (a cardiac arrest). Of these, approximately 100 young people per year will have no cause found even after extensive investigations such as a full autopsy (the SADS phenomenon).’
Apparently, SADS is now so common that the medical authorities must quickly develop a national registry to track SADS cases.

A Health Desk article published on June 7 notes that, ‘Most scientists think SADS is caused by a heart condition that interferes with the heart’s electrical system.’

Ah, so it’s a heart condition. Interesting.

It’s unfortunate that no sooner have we gone through a pandemic that a condition synonymous with ‘people dying of heart conditions for no apparent reason’ is on the rise. Is this simply terrible luck for the human species, or did something happen between the beginning of Covid and the emergence of this new epidemic that might explain it? In other words, what changed between then and now that might be affecting people’s hearts? Surely, any rational, objective, and truth-seeking person would ask this question…

Except, questions are becoming increasingly difficult to ask in a censorial medical world protective of its assets.

We are not really allowed to ask if these deaths in otherwise healthy young adults have anything to do with the last two years of abnormal health orders or the entry onto the market of new technology with limited long-term safety information.

What we do know is that mRNA vaccines have been linked to an alarming amount of deaths during a three-month trial period conducted by Pfizer in documents that they sought to suppress for 75 years – a request that was denied by the judge.

We also know that these vaccines are officially – according to vaccine safety regulators, manufacturers, and investigations conducted between 2020-22 – connected to a rise in cardiac problems such as myocarditis and pericarditis, along with a range of other health issues including neurological disorders and sometimes death.

The New York Times previously published an article discussing the link:

Federal officials are reviewing nearly 800 cases of rare heart problems following immunization with the coronavirus vaccines made by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, according to data presented at a vaccine safety meeting on Thursday.
Not all of the cases are likely to be verified or related to vaccines, and experts believe the benefits of immunization far outweigh the risk of these rare complications. But the reports have worried some researchers. More than half of the
heart problems were reported in people ages 12 to 24, while the same age group accounted for only 9 percent of the millions of doses administered.
We clearly have an imbalance there,” said Dr. Tom Shimabukuro, a vaccine expert at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention who presented the data.
It is also true that Australian healthcare professionals were told by AHPRA not to undermine the Covid vaccine program in any way lest they lose their medical licenses.

These are the same vaccines that were mandated by public health order or corporate directions, resulting in over 90 per cent of the adult population taking at least one (but almost certainly two or more) doses within the last couple of years.

It is becoming increasingly obvious where we should be looking when it comes to all these ‘co-incidental’ spikes in diseases and deaths that have come out of nowhere in the last two years. If we were approaching science objectively and rationally, it would be permissible to ask questions of vaccine manufacturers – even if only to rule them out, once and for all, as the culprit.

However, these are not solely questions of science, but also of money, business, and political reputation. Organisations such as the TGA have not exactly been eager to investigate situations that could call into question their previous judgment (even though they have a history of making mistakes regarding medical safety).

Instead, we are being told to accept the sudden rise in SADS and the deaths of young people without investigation. After all, no one wants to be called a conspiracy theorist or an anti-vaxxer.

The Health Desk article mentioned above anticipates the questions of the ‘conspiracy theorists’ and explains:

Vaccines have not been associated or linked to sudden death in adults or children in general. Myocarditis, inflammation of the heart muscle, has been associated in extremely rare cases following some vaccination efforts but cardiac issues following a COVID-19 diagnosis are common.
The incidence of COVID-19 in communities is closely linked with higher numbers of sudden cardiac arrest incidence and lower survival rates. In fact, the Sudden Arrhythmia Death Syndromes Foundation recommends that all SADS patients receive a COVID-19 vaccination.
If this is meant to inspire confidence in the Covid vaccines, it does a poor job.

Myocarditis is not ‘extremely rare’ after a Covid vaccination in the way that childhood vaccines produced almost unheard of side effects.
Even if the TGA’s figures related to Covid vaccines and heart conditions are taken at face value despite complaints of missing data, it’s clear that developing heart-related conditions after receiving a Covid vaccine is common enough to warrant some countries to put age limits on certain brands.

The missing information that would help to clear this situation up would be the vaccination status of those who are tragically dying to clear up whether it really is a Covid infection (as explained away by some medical journals) or vaccination.

People don’t die without any cause at all, yet the past year or so has seen a lot of people ‘die suddenly’, often from heart attacks, have you noticed? It is not only in Australia. These rises are being seen across the Western world causing enough concern to warrant medical investigations.

If we care about truth at all, these questions have to be asked.
 
Last edited:
In the articles about Australia and Britain, it specifically stated doctors are concerned about the sudden rise in SADS deaths. No 'data' was presented. Just that doctors were concerned about it.

The other data I presented, like the Israel study, showed the 25% increase in cardiac arrest incidents in 2021. The insurance mortality data shows the increases in deaths being up to as much as a 40% - rates they have never seen before.

Combine that data with the articles' statements.

Their quotes, not mine: "Doctors baffled by increase in Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS). DOCTORS in Australia are developing the country’s first SADS registry after recent incidents of healthy young people dying from Sudden Adult Death Syndrome."

Not all of the deaths/incidents anomalies are attributable to vaccines. But something is clearly going on and the vaccines should be a part of the i
Can you give me the link to the article that says "doctors baffled by increase"? Because when I google that phrase I get this:


Doctors baffled by Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS) in healthy young people​


Which says nothing about "increase" and is also not really true, because doctors are not actually that "baffled". They know the causes which are in most cases genetic heart conditions. They know that people with a family history of this should get screened. There is no doctor quoted as being baffled or saying there's been an increase. Certainly not a "sudden rise".
 
Last edited:
And you will dispute this since it's fact check.org but it quotes a doctor who was referenced in the article on the registry:

Australian Registry Launched in 2019​

As for the Daily Mail story that sparked the claims on social media, “There was some mis-reporting,” Dr. Elizabeth Paratz — who was referenced in the story but wasn’t contacted for comment — told us by email.

Although both the story and the headline claimed that Australia had a “new national register” for tracking SADS, it doesn’t. That project was started in 2019 in the Australian state of Victoria.

Paratz, a cardiologist who is currently researching sudden cardiac arrest, told us that the registry began “in response to recognition that what we call ‘unascertained’ or ‘unexplained’ sudden cardiac arrest in Australia and is sometimes referred to overseas as sudden arrhythmic death syndrome … is actually the most common cause of sudden cardiac death in young people. This has been well-recognised for many years.”

In a 2020 review of similar registries, Paratz and colleagues found that there were 15 sudden cardiac death registries around the world, including the one in Victoria.

There has been no increase in SADS since the COVID-19 vaccines became widely available in 2021, Paratz said.

Furthermore, she said, “There is no signal that any vaccine, including the COVID-19 vaccines, are behind SADS cases.”

Paratz also noted that, although the Daily Mail referred to SADS as “Sudden Adult Death Syndrome,” the “A” actually stands for arrhythmic, not adult.

And she cited studies about SADS going back to 2004, saying, “As you can see, unascertained sudden cardiac death / SADS has been a major public health issue recognised for decades.”

In fact, a 2007 British study looked at 56 SADS cases from the late 1990s and the first documented case of LQTS dates back to 1856 in Germany.

So, the story on which the suggestive social media posts are based is flawed, and there is no evidence of an uptick in SADS cases since the COVID-19 vaccines became available or that vaccines would cause SADS.
 
Can you give me the link to the article that says "doctors baffled by increase"? Because when I google that phrase I get this:


Doctors baffled by Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS) in healthy young people​


Which says nothing about "increase" and is also not really true, because doctors are not actually that "baffled". They know the causes which are in most cases genetic heart conditions. They know that people with a family history of this should get screened. There is no doctor quoted as being baffled or saying there's been an increase. Certainly not a "sudden rise".


1656020203828.png


A strange new medical anomaly has doctors baffled as it sweeps across the country. Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS) is on the rise, and it’s tragically claiming the lives of healthy young adults, sometimes in their sleep.

Essentially, people are dying without displaying any prior sign of illness. They simply do not wake up after going to bed, or collapse during the day.

Reports of SADS have been increasing in recent weeks. A news.com web piece explains that, ‘Sudden Adult Death Syndrome … is an umbrella term to describe unexpected deaths in young people, usually under 40, when a post-mortem can find no obvious cause of death.’


While national figures are not available, Melbourne’s Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute is developing the country’s first SADS registry, which it hopes to eventually roll out across the country.

Why are they creating the registry? Because numbers aren't there because they haven't been historically tracked. But now they feel the need to track them. Why? Because they are on the rise.
 
Furthermore, she said, “There is no signal that any vaccine, including the COVID-19 vaccines, are behind SADS cases.”

I won't attack the article, just her credibility with this claim.

We know for a fact that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines cause myocarditis and we know myocarditis can lead to heart attacks.
We know this to be fact because their published test data admitted it, and post vaccination analysis has shown this to be true.
We know this to be fact because the FDA put warning labels on the vax warning of myocarditis.

For a medical doctor to say "there is no signal" vaccines could be behind SADS when there is a direct link between the vaccines and myocarditis makes me seriously question her position.
 
More great news about the vaccines...published June 23

Risk benefit of the vaccines is negative according to a new paper from Stanford, UCLA, others​



Introduction: In 2020, prior to COVID-19 vaccine rollout, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations and Brighton Collaboration created a priority list, endorsed by the World Health Organization, of potential adverse events relevant to COVID-19 vaccines. We leveraged the Brighton Collaboration list to evaluate serious adverse events of special interest observed in phase III randomized trials of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

Methods: Secondary analysis of serious adverse events reported in the placebo-controlled, phase III randomized clinical trials of Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (NCT04368728 and NCT04470427), focusing analysis on potential adverse events of special interest identified by the Brighton Collaboration.

Results: Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events of special interest, with an absolute risk increase of 10.1 and 15.1 per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo baselines of 17.6 and 42.2 (95% CI -0.4 to 20.6 and -3.6 to 33.8), respectively. Combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an absolute risk increase of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 (95% CI 2.1 to 22.9). The excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest surpassed the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group in both Pfizer and Moderna trials (2.3 and 6.4 per 10,000 participants, respectively).

Discussion
: The excess risk of serious adverse events found in our study points to the need for formal harm-benefit analyses, particularly those that are stratified according to risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes such as hospitalization or death.
 
Turns out the claims that the CDC has been investigating VAERS Adverse Events Reports about the Covid vaccines are false. They haven't investigated...


In late January of 2021, the CDC released a briefing document outlining the agency’s standard operating procedures (SOP) for ongoing monitoring of VAERS for safety signals from COVID-19 vaccines. The document describes the analyses that the VAERS team at the CDC’s own Immunization Safety Office was going to conduct in their “unprecedented” effort to monitor the safety of the new COVID-19 vaccines. This included a plan to produce weekly tables of the incidence of about forty different adverse events. They would also engage in data mining using PRRs and create tables with the results (you can read the document at the link above for more details - see esp. sections 2.2-2.5):

1656021931384.png

At my request, the amazing legal team at CHD submitted a FOIA request to CDC asking for:
  1. Copies of the weekly tables they said they would produce from Feb 1-Sept. 30, 2021.
  2. Copies of all tables, analyses and reports generated in connection with ‘Signal Detection Analyses’ as described in sections 2.3 and 2.5 of the SOP document, also from Feb 1-Sept. 30.
Well guess what? In their response letter they state that “no PRRs were conducted by CDC” and that “data mining is outside of the agency’s purview” even though their own SOP document from January stated they would do data mining.



The response letter goes on to say that the agency has “conducted ‘signal assessment’ as described in section 2.5 (i.e. assessed that a causal association exists between the vaccine and both TTS and myocarditis), that assessment involved no formal records.”


They told us the data monitoring they were doing was rigorous and unprecedented. They said they were going to use the most rudimentary pharmacovigilance tool, PRRs, to monitor safety. They lied.

Furthermore, although their response letter defines ‘signal assessment’ as finding a causal connection, it actually refers to all follow-up analyses done following a safety signal, as described in the SOP document:

1656022044946.png

The depths of the CDC’s safety monitoring failure doesn’t stop there. We requested the weekly tables they promised to produce beginning Feb 1, 2021, since the SOP document was dated Jan. 29. But the first table they supplied us with is dated April 2. That means they only started “monitoring” VAERS more than 3 months after the vaccines were deployed in mid-December.

They also said they were going to produce no less than 8 different tables every week. You can see the list in section 2.2.2 in the SOP document pages 15-16. It includes:

Table 1. All reports following COVID-19 vaccines by severity and selected manufacturer/brand name
Table 2. Top 25 most frequently reported AEs
Table 3. Reports of the following AESIs after vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines, stratified by age group (ages <18 years, 18–49 years, 50–64 years, 75–84, years, 85+ years, unreported):
• Death • COVID-19 Disease • Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) • Seizure • Stroke • Narcolepsy/Cataplexy • Anaphylaxis • Acute Myocardial Infarction • Myopericarditis • Coagulopathy • Transverse Myelitis • Multisystemic Inflammatory Syndrome in Adults (MIS-A)
Table 4. Reporting trends of the following AESIs after vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines, stratified by age group (<12 months, 12–35 months, 36–59 months, 5–11 years, 12–20 years, >20 years, unreported):
• Kawasaki Disease • Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C)
Table 5. Reporting trends of VACCINATION DURING PREGNANCY following vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines stratified by age group (ages <18 years, 18–29 years, 30–39 years, 40–49 years, ≥50 years, unreported)
Table 6. Reporting trends of Autoimmune Disorders by System Organ Class following vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines by age group (ages <18 years, 18–49 years, 50–64 years, 65–74 years, 75+ years, unreported)
Table 7. Reporting trends of AESIs to monitor but not abstract (Table 2, p. 8), following vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines by age group (ages <18 years, 18–49 years, 50–64 years, 75–84, years, 85+ years, unreported).
Table 8. Vaccination errors
How many of these did they actually produce? Turns out, their weekly reports include 2 tables:

One table that lists the number of deaths reported, serious non-death reports, non-serious reports and all reports by state. A second table that reports the data listed above for tables 3-5 by age. Missing is a table with AE’s broken down by manufacturer; they don’t have table 2 at all; the age groups promised for table 4 are completely different (with the lowest age range being 0-17 years); and the information promised in tables 6 and above is non-existent — including no information on auto-immune diseases.

Ouch.
 
This article sums up my thoughts nearly perfectly.


A strange new medical anomaly has doctors baffled as it sweeps across the country. Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS) is on the rise, and it’s tragically claiming the lives of healthy young adults, sometimes in their sleep.

Essentially, people are dying without displaying any prior sign of illness. They simply do not wake up after going to bed, or collapse during the day.

Reports of SADS have been increasing in recent weeks. A news.com web piece explains that, ‘Sudden Adult Death Syndrome … is an umbrella term to describe unexpected deaths in young people, usually under 40, when a post-mortem can find no obvious cause of death.’

The Melbourne-based Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute hopes to roll out a nation-wide registry to track cases.


Apparently, SADS is now so common that the medical authorities must quickly develop a national registry to track SADS cases.

A Health Desk article published on June 7 notes that, ‘Most scientists think SADS is caused by a heart condition that interferes with the heart’s electrical system.’

Ah, so it’s a heart condition. Interesting.

It’s unfortunate that no sooner have we gone through a pandemic that a condition synonymous with ‘people dying of heart conditions for no apparent reason’ is on the rise. Is this simply terrible luck for the human species, or did something happen between the beginning of Covid and the emergence of this new epidemic that might explain it? In other words, what changed between then and now that might be affecting people’s hearts? Surely, any rational, objective, and truth-seeking person would ask this question…

Except, questions are becoming increasingly difficult to ask in a censorial medical world protective of its assets.

We are not really allowed to ask if these deaths in otherwise healthy young adults have anything to do with the last two years of abnormal health orders or the entry onto the market of new technology with limited long-term safety information.

What we do know is that mRNA vaccines have been linked to an alarming amount of deaths during a three-month trial period conducted by Pfizer in documents that they sought to suppress for 75 years – a request that was denied by the judge.

We also know that these vaccines are officially – according to vaccine safety regulators, manufacturers, and investigations conducted between 2020-22 – connected to a rise in cardiac problems such as myocarditis and pericarditis, along with a range of other health issues including neurological disorders and sometimes death.

The New York Times previously published an article discussing the link:


It is also true that Australian healthcare professionals were told by AHPRA not to undermine the Covid vaccine program in any way lest they lose their medical licenses.

These are the same vaccines that were mandated by public health order or corporate directions, resulting in over 90 per cent of the adult population taking at least one (but almost certainly two or more) doses within the last couple of years.

It is becoming increasingly obvious where we should be looking when it comes to all these ‘co-incidental’ spikes in diseases and deaths that have come out of nowhere in the last two years. If we were approaching science objectively and rationally, it would be permissible to ask questions of vaccine manufacturers – even if only to rule them out, once and for all, as the culprit.

However, these are not solely questions of science, but also of money, business, and political reputation. Organisations such as the TGA have not exactly been eager to investigate situations that could call into question their previous judgment (even though they have a history of making mistakes regarding medical safety).

Instead, we are being told to accept the sudden rise in SADS and the deaths of young people without investigation. After all, no one wants to be called a conspiracy theorist or an anti-vaxxer.

The Health Desk article mentioned above anticipates the questions of the ‘conspiracy theorists’ and explains:



If this is meant to inspire confidence in the Covid vaccines, it does a poor job.

Myocarditis is not ‘extremely rare’ after a Covid vaccination in the way that childhood vaccines produced almost unheard of side effects. Even if the TGA’s figures related to Covid vaccines and heart conditions are taken at face value despite complaints of missing data, it’s clear that developing heart-related conditions after receiving a Covid vaccine is common enough to warrant some countries to put age limits on certain brands.

The missing information that would help to clear this situation up would be the vaccination status of those who are tragically dying to clear up whether it really is a Covid infection (as explained away by some medical journals) or vaccination.

People don’t die without any cause at all, yet the past year or so has seen a lot of people ‘die suddenly’, often from heart attacks, have you noticed? It is not only in Australia. These rises are being seen across the Western world causing enough concern to warrant medical investigations.

If we care about truth at all, these questions have to be asked.
That article is sufficiently vague throughout.

“Apparently SADS is so common”? What is the “increase” in cases? “A lot of people”? “The rises are being seen”? Defined by what? What does it have to do with myocarditis? The myocarditis side effect WAS rare (1/46,000) and was mostly mild, deaths were nearly unheard of. When was the NYT article from? Recently? It doesn’t even mention SADS.
 
That article is sufficiently vague throughout.

“Apparently SADS is so common”? What is the “increase” in cases? “A lot of people”? “The rises are being seen”? Defined by what? What does it have to do with myocarditis? The myocarditis side effect WAS rare (1/46,000) and was mostly mild, deaths were nearly unheard of. When was the NYT article from? Recently? It doesn’t even mention SADS.

The article indicates this should be looked into. Investigated.

The CDC isn't looking into it.

Everyone just wants to pretend everything is ok......

Not vague: We also know that these vaccines are officially – according to vaccine safety regulators, manufacturers, and investigations conducted between 2020-22 – connected to a rise in cardiac problems such as myocarditis and pericarditis, along with a range of other health issues including neurological disorders and sometimes death.

The NYT doesn't need to mention SADS. SADS is sudden cardiac death. The NYT validates that the vaccines cause heart related issues. Causality.

Federal officials are reviewing nearly 800 cases of rare heart problems following immunization with the coronavirus vaccines made by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, according to data presented at a vaccine safety meeting on Thursday... More than half of the heart problems were reported in people ages 12 to 24, while the same age group accounted for only 9 percent of the millions of doses administered.
We clearly have an imbalance there,” said Dr. Tom Shimabukuro, a vaccine expert at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention who presented the data.
None of that is vague.

The article is from 2021. Because it was known early on that the vaccines caused heart related issues. So much so that warning labels are now on the drugs because...you know...myocarditis.
 
Last edited:
Can we force liberals to take the vaccine?

Results​

Serum samples were collected from nine, 12, and 16 SD at the sperm banks of Shamir, Sheba, and Herzylia Medical Centers, which yielded 63 samples, 78 samples, and 79 samples for the analysis. The average age of the donors was 26 ± 4.2 years. The baseline (T0) serum samples were obtained prior to vaccination (≤2 serum samples from each SD), and the mean time intervals for sample collection after BNT162b2 vaccination was 27 ± 10 days, 93 ± 13 days, and 175 ± 27 days after BNT162b2 vaccination for the T1 phase, T2 phase, and T3 phase, respectively.

Compared to the T0 phase, the sperm concentration was reduced by 15.4%, with a 22% reduction in the total motile count during the T2 phase. Likewise, analysis of only the first sample showed reductions in sperm concentrations by 12 x 106/ml and in TMC by 31 x 106 spermatozoa during the T2 phase in comparison to the T0 phase.


No worries. Just lower sperm count among 22-30 year old males in Israel following the 2nd shot.
 
I won't attack the article, just her credibility with this claim.

We know for a fact that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines cause myocarditis and we know myocarditis can lead to heart attacks.
We know this to be fact because their published test data admitted it, and post vaccination analysis has shown this to be true.
We know this to be fact because the FDA put warning labels on the vax warning of myocarditis.

For a medical doctor to say "there is no signal" vaccines could be behind SADS when there is a direct link between the vaccines and myocarditis makes me seriously question her position.
So are you going to at all address the fact that the registry you claim
Is evidence of recent increases in SADS was actually created in 2019? Or just ignore that?
 
So are you going to at all address the fact that the registry you claim
Is evidence of recent increases in SADS was actually created in 2019? Or just ignore that?

One person, who I claim (legitimately) credibility issues with says the registry was created in 2019. May be true. Does that indicate there is no concern over, or a real increase in SADS deaths? No.

Given the claims of SADS increases are recent (very recent), I'll wait for time to pass to see if this materializes. I've said to you personally many times, if there is smoke there is likely fire many times before. Most of the time, those claims came to be true.

We were told the vaccines would prevent the spread of Covid.
We were told the vaccines would prevent people from becoming seriously ill and dying.
We were told the adverse events reported from these vaccines weren't legitimate.
We were told there were no proven links between vaccines and reproductive health damages.

Those claims can now be disproven.

I'll wait. I may be right, I may be wrong. But these are still the deadliest vaccines ever introduced to mankind. There's a lot of unexplained coincidences.
 
Can we force liberals to take the vaccine?




No worries. Just lower sperm count among 22-30 year old males in Israel following the 2nd shot.

I tried sharing this data before. I was told there's no 'legitimate' evidence of vaccines causing reproductive health issues.

Ahem..
 
Liberals have all had 3/4 shots
 
Liberals have all had 3/4 shots

And Biden, yesterday - senile fool - publicly stated we have to be ready for the second pandemic, because there will be a pandemic.

It never ends with the Left.
 
Remember over the course of our lifetime, things that we were told were bad for us and vice versa, then only to be proven false?
It may take years, maybe decades, before this all gets sorted out. I'm only skeptical because so much of the data, like all of the recorded video of the worst
day in the history of the world, has been suppressed. I don't think that makes me a conspiracy theorist.
 
Dr. Birx admits the truth. Thank you Mr. Jordan, excellent questioning. "We knew the vaccines didn't work."

 
Top