• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Covid Vaccine

Nonsense, top to bottom. You’re living in your own reality. There was no way to ship the elderly to some Covid-free land, that’s why there were restrictions. No serious person is calling the vaccines dangerous.
My daughter in law is. My sons friend is. You are the one living in your own reality. If you say that you dont know anyone that has had a negative reaction to the vax you are lying.
 
Nonsense, top to bottom. You’re living in your own reality. There was no way to ship the elderly to some Covid-free land, that’s why there were restrictions. No serious person is calling the vaccines dangerous.

You claimed that age adjusted data relating to deaths has been around forever and was used throughout the pandemic.

I showed you literal examples proving it was not used.

The Government and the media are now using "age adjusted" to spin the narrative.

That is reality.
 
Nonsense, top to bottom. You’re living in your own reality. There was no way to ship the elderly to some Covid-free land, that’s why there were restrictions. No serious person is calling the vaccines dangerous.
This would be a covid free world if not for your hero Fouchy.
 
My daughter in law is. My sons friend is. You are the one living in your own reality. If you say that you dont know anyone that has had a negative reaction to the vax you are lying.

No, he's behaving like his Liberal leaders have taught him to behave. Disagree with them, they broad-brush call everyone deplorables. If you're against the President, you're an Ultra MAGA, or a semi-facist.

It's typical Liberal mantra - the party of "free speech" (no more) labels and attempts to dismiss anyone that doesn't subscribe to their thought.

He's lost every substantive argument in this thread. He's now down to name calling and character assassination LOL
 
You claimed that age adjusted data relating to deaths has been around forever and was used throughout the pandemic.

I showed you literal examples proving it was not used.

The Government and the media are now using "age adjusted" to spin the narrative.

That is reality.
No, you claimed that the media “came up with” it. Invented it. I provided a source from 2009. Long before Covid or the vaccine. It’s been used for decades. It’s science, you idiot.
 
My daughter in law is. My sons friend is. You are the one living in your own reality. If you say that you dont know anyone that has had a negative reaction to the vax you are lying.
I was fatigued the day after my second shot. It doesn’t make the vaccine dangerous. Pedestrians sometimes get hit by buses, it doesn’t make taking a walk dangerous. They’re currently advising that people get a fourth shot. REALITY. Not delusional social media.
 
No, you claimed that the media “came up with” it. Invented it. I provided a source from 2009. Long before Covid or the vaccine. It’s been used for decades. It’s science, you idiot.

No, I claimed they just began using it now as the "science" has changed when previously they refused to. You might stop reading so literally into comments and understand the context. Why would we have argued for two years that they should have been using age adjusted #s when driving fear porn down the throats of Americans...

Keep up.
 
I was fatigued the day after my second shot. It doesn’t make the vaccine dangerous. Pedestrians sometimes get hit by buses, it doesn’t make taking a walk dangerous.

You have a 99.87% chance (or thereabouts) of getting Covid and surviving. It doesn't make Covid dangerous. Or the flu. Or the cold.

Thanks for making the point we've tried to make all along.


They’re currently advising that people get a fourth shot. REALITY. Not delusional social media.

Given the load of cases among the vaccinated, given the ineffectiveness of the vaccines, only sheep will be following this "recommendation." Therefore, we know you will.

Meanwhile, the only people I know of getting Covid are the vaxxed. I know over a half dozen people currently with Covid. Everyone one, multi-jabbed.

REALITY is you're an idiot if you keep taking boosters.
 
1661713311198.png
 
No, I claimed they just began using it now as the "science" has changed when previously they refused to. You might stop reading so literally into comments and understand the context. Why would we have argued for two years that they should have been using age adjusted #s when driving fear porn down the throats of Americans...

Keep up.
Again. The vaccine didn’t even exist two years ago. Once they started comparing the vaccinated vs unvaccinated population, they used age adjusted data for obvious reasons just as they would with any medical intervention. Science. READ.

 
You have a 99.87% chance (or thereabouts) of getting Covid and surviving. It doesn't make Covid dangerous. Or the flu. Or the cold.

Thanks for making the point we've tried to make all along.




Given the load of cases among the vaccinated, given the ineffectiveness of the vaccines, only sheep will be following this "recommendation." Therefore, we know you will.

Meanwhile, the only people I know of getting Covid are the vaxxed. I know over a half dozen people currently with Covid. Everyone one, multi-jabbed.

REALITY is you're an idiot if you keep taking boosters.
Reality is 6.5 million people died from Covid, not the vaccine. 4.9 BILLION people are fully vaccinated.

 
Again. The vaccine didn’t even exist two years ago. Once they started comparing the vaccinated vs unvaccinated population, they used age adjusted data for obvious reasons just as they would with any medical intervention. Science. READ.


Wrong again son. I provided you links to current Covid trackers that STILL don't use age-adjusted formulas. It's random at best.

And as I have stated time and again - which you refuse to comprehend - is that my comment wasn't just about comparing vaccinated status. It's about all Covid data they selectively fed all of us. Namely, early on, death rates. They told everyone the death rate is X and refused to acknowledge that the elderly were the vast majority of deaths and that if age adjusted it showed it really wasn't a threat to vast majority of us under 65.

NOW they apply age adjustments (selectively) to deaths among the vaccinated and unvaxed.

As I said, you can't make this **** up. You can choose to see it, but won't with your eyes closed.
 
Reality is 6.5 million people died from Covid, not the vaccine. 4.9 BILLION people are fully vaccinated.


The best response is to have you read the prior...again.

You have a 99.87% chance (or thereabouts) of getting Covid and surviving. It doesn't make Covid dangerous. Or the flu. Or the cold.

Thanks for making the point we've tried to make all along.
 
The best response is to have you read the prior...again.

You have a 99.87% chance (or thereabouts) of getting Covid and surviving. It doesn't make Covid dangerous. Or the flu. Or the cold.

Thanks for making the point we've tried to make all along.
Uh-huh. These people had a 0% chance of getting Covid and surviving.

 
I'm beginning to believe that the FBI killed those prominent conservatives to keep the Covid hysteria alive. (#mindblown)
You knew the Tree of Life motive before it happened. Was this on Gab as well?
 
Again....you can't make this **** up.

1661734580838.png

The Food and Drug Administration is expected to authorize new Covid-19 booster shots this week without a staple of its normal decision-making process: data from a study showing whether the shots were safe and worked in humans.

The shots, modified to target the latest versions of the Omicron variant, won’t have finished testing in humans when the FDA makes its decisions.

Instead, the agency plans to assess the shots using data from other sources such as research in mice, the profiles of the original vaccines and the performance of earlier iterations of boosters targeting older forms of Omicron.
 

Attachments

  • 1661734541104.png
    1661734541104.png
    47.5 KB · Views: 0
I was fatigued the day after my second shot. It doesn’t make the vaccine dangerous. Pedestrians sometimes get hit by buses, it doesn’t make taking a walk dangerous. They’re currently advising that people get a fourth shot. REALITY. Not delusional social media.
Thats a stupid analogy. And you are avoiding the question. Do you know anyone that had a negative reaction to the vax?
 
Again....you can't make this **** up.

View attachment 9342

The Food and Drug Administration is expected to authorize new Covid-19 booster shots this week without a staple of its normal decision-making process: data from a study showing whether the shots were safe and worked in humans.

The shots, modified to target the latest versions of the Omicron variant, won’t have finished testing in humans when the FDA makes its decisions.

Instead, the agency plans to assess the shots using data from other sources such as research in mice, the profiles of the original vaccines and the performance of earlier iterations of boosters targeting older forms of Omicron.
Why would these new flu ahots be different than the pvs flu shots?
 
Thats a stupid analogy. And you are avoiding the question. Do you know anyone that had a negative reaction to the vax?

The chances of dying getting hit by a car are 1 in 101.
1661746836538.png

The chances of dying by getting Covid are 1 in 150.
1661746872474.png

Argument over.

Dumb analogy indeed.
 
Thats a stupid analogy. And you are avoiding the question. Do you know anyone that had a negative reaction to the vax?
A serious reaction? No. I do know two people that were hospitalized with Covid and two others that died.
 
Do you know anyone that had a negative reaction to the vax?
I don't. At least not outside of the normal injection side effects. I don't know anyone that had a serious adverse reaction.
 
Top