because ... and follow along here, as I'm going to copy/paste this as slowly as humanly possible...
As of March 2022, CDC no longer recommends universal case investigation and contact tracing and recommends that health department jurisdictions prioritize specific settings and groups at increased risk.
instead of national and widespread regardless of age, health and location.
"specific settings" should include nursing homes and places where people have immunocompromised issues.
that does not include, as YOU stated --- football stadiums, etc
"groups" - pretty much suggesting those people who are immunocompromised or unhealthy. not children, athletes, people in good health.
and leaving it up to individuals.
which... if you scroll back about 500+ pages is what we had been at all along.
Thank you for pointing out that the CDC now agrees with what we've been stating here.
No dumbass, stay on point. You've accused me and others of not having posted scientific, medically researched findings. We have. Over, and over and over.
I didn't say I've posted hundreds of articles showing the same thing.
Does keeping your job entail reading AND comprehending? I hope not.
I had an appointment before work this morning at Aspen Dental for a buff and polish. I had to put a mask on when I entered the office. How dumb is that?
LMAO....I had an ENT appointment today. MASKS REQUIRED. Get into the exam room, doc asks me to lower the mask for the rest of the damned 25 min appointment to do the exam.
Interesting placement of the word "immediately." You're expecting it to come huh?
Notice that what they conclude says the risks of the vaccines outweigh the benefits. It's right in the study.
The results of the accepted scientific study confirm that the concerns that many patients had about the mRNA vaccines were well-founded.
“In the Moderna trial, the excess risk of serious AESIs (15.1 per 10,000 participants) was higher than the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group (6.4 per 10,000 participants),” the study found.
“In the Pfizer trial, the excess risk of serious AESIs (10.1 per 10,000) was higher than the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group (2.3 per 10,000 participants),” the study added."
Can you understand that? They are saying by taking either vaccine you have a greater risk of an adverse event than the risk reduction of hospitalization.
LMAO....I had an ENT appointment today. MASKS REQUIRED. Get into the exam room, doc asks me to lower the mask for the rest of the damned 25 min appointment to do the exam.
Births are plunging EXACTLY on schedule, nine months after mass Covid vaccinations
alexberenson.substack.com
Singapore knows how to make its people behave.
The Asian city-state is famously uptight. It punishes criminals with caning and has prohibited chewing gum since 1992. (Do not under any circumstances deal drugs in Singapore; a 41-year-old man was sentenced to death after being caught with two pounds of cannabis in 2018.)
So when Singapore told its nearly 6 million residents to be vaccinated against Covid, it had very high compliance.
What is particularly interesting - though unsurprising - is how well Singapore stratified vaccine administration by age. As the chart below shows, in a few weeks in June and July 2021, nearly every Singaporean adult between 20-39 - childbearing age, essentially - received their first Covid vaccine jab.
Ministry of Health (MOH) is an innovative, people-centred organisation, committed to medical excellence, the promotion of good health, the reduction of illness and access to good and affordable healthcare for all Singaporeans, appropriate to their needs.
www.moh.gov.sg
The incredibly rapid uptake of vaccines among young Singaporean adults offers a natural experiment in the effect of mRNA shots on fertility. (Roughly 98 percent of all the jabs Singapore gave were mRNA from Pfizer or Moderna. Chinese vaccines used traditional inactivated virus technology made up the rest.)
You will not be surprised at this point to learn that Singapore publishes comprehensive figures on births and deaths every quarter.
Like other East Asian countries, Singapore is suffering severe baby bust. The average woman in Singapore has fewer than 1.2 children, barely half the birth rate needed to avert a long-term decline in population.
As low as the birth rate was, though, it had remained stable for a decade. Even Covid did not meaningfully change the number of births - 39,259 in 2019, 38,590 in 2020, and 38,672 in 2021.
In the first two months of 2022, Singapore received welcome news. Births actually rose about 7.5 percent.
Then came March. Again, Singapore began mass mRNA vaccinations of women (and men) of childbearing age in June 2021; March 2022 is exactly nine months later.
In March, the increase in births abruptly reversed. Between March and June 2022 - the most recent month for which figures are available - Singapore has recorded about 1,000 fewer live births compared to 2021, a decline of 8.5 percent. The drop has been consistent each month.
Most recent Singapore Demographics Bulletin (SDB), Annual Birth & Deaths Statistics and ICA Annual Statistics Report
ica.gov.sg
A 16 percent shift in birth rates practically overnight is, to say the least, highly unusual.
And Covid itself, or “long Covid,” whatever long Covid may be, cannot be blamed. Singapore had essentially no Covid until the fall of 2021 (well after mass vaccinations were complete, but that’s another story).
Actually I don't think so. If he had to live under Communism, he wouldn't like it.
More like full blown Democrat who refuses to realize his party has been taken over by Communists. I know a lot of people like that.
Actually I don't think so. If he had to live under Communism, he wouldn't like it.
More like full blown Democrat who refuses to realize his party has been taken over by Communists. I know a lot of people like that.
I also don't think so. He's not a communist. He's an idiot. Sorry to be so harsh. Idiots are easily recruited BY communists and socialists. They are the sheep that vote to keep the evil in power. He's just a loud voice for the stupid among us.
Masks are absolutely worthless. In fact they're more likely to make you sick through cross contamination. Just handle your cell phone,ATM card payment machines and doors handles. Then touch your digits to your worthless mask for adjustment and bam, you're snorting all kinds of nasties all day. All those cute cloth designer masks, I bet many folks didn't even clean them daily either.
Except nothing with that high of adverse effects has ever not been at least temporarily withdrawn to perform more tests… they fudged or at least misrepresented data to pass the clinical trials early… like they often do
All you have to know is that pfizers own documents did such awesome things as listed miscarriages as positively resolved issues to keep numbers down…
I know a guy who's in reasonably good shape who had to get his appendix removed 6 days after receiving his second shot.
Guy I went to grade school and high school with had to have his appendix removed after receiving his FOURTH shot.
i know, anecdote, but still you said you didnt know of anyone... i know of two.
Not saying it doesnt happen, I just personally dont know anyone who had severe adverse reactions. Of course most people w/ Covid now are vaxxed because a large number of the population is vaxxed. First time I had it my daughter and GF did not get it. I do not think either were vaxxed at the time. 2nd time I got it my daughter brought it home from daycare and all 3 of us had it. My daughter is unvaxxed and 11, my GF just had 2 shots and I had 3 total. At work its kinda been a mixed bag ranging from no shots to 4 shots, but we only have a handful of staff who have not had at least 2 shots or 1 J&J. Most residents are double boosted and only had one case in the last few months. Some homes in my area are back in COVID hell so hopefully we stay out of that.
Not saying it doesnt happen, I just personally dont know anyone who had severe adverse reactions. Of course most people w/ Covid now are vaxxed because a large number of the population is vaxxed. First time I had it my daughter and GF did not get it. I do not think either were vaxxed at the time. 2nd time I got it my daughter brought it home from daycare and all 3 of us had it. My daughter is unvaxxed and 11, my GF just had 2 shots and I had 3 total. At work its kinda been a mixed bag ranging from no shots to 4 shots, but we only have a handful of staff who have not had at least 2 shots or 1 J&J. Most residents are double boosted and only had one case in the last few months. Some homes in my area are back in COVID hell so hopefully we stay out of that.
So how long have you worked at the Wuhan Institute of Monkey Flus and Promoting Transmission, jitter$50? And do they pay you at least, say, $50 per paycheck?
Study from Brazil - yes, not a controlled study but simply observational, I get it - showed that using Ivermectin as a prophylaxis (for (D)imbo voters, that means preventative) is effective in preventing getting the Chinese flu and VERY effective in preventing hospitalization and mortality from the Chinese flu. The mortality rate for those using Ivermectin as a prophylaxis was 0.8%, compared to 2.6% for those not using Ivermectin.
Background: Ivermectin has demonstrated different mechanisms of action that potentially protect from both coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and COVID-19-related comorbidities. Based on the studies suggesting efficacy in prophylaxis combined with the known safety profile of...
www.cureus.com
But hey, drug manufacturers could not make a trillion dollars on Ivermectin, so there's that.
Interesting placement of the word "immediately." You're expecting it to come huh?
Notice that what they conclude says the risks of the vaccines outweigh the benefits. It's right in the study.
The results of the accepted scientific study confirm that the concerns that many patients had about the mRNA vaccines were well-founded.
“In the Moderna trial, the excess risk of serious AESIs (15.1 per 10,000 participants) was higher than the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group (6.4 per 10,000 participants),” the study found.
“In the Pfizer trial, the excess risk of serious AESIs (10.1 per 10,000) was higher than the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group (2.3 per 10,000 participants),” the study added."
Can you understand that? They are saying by taking either vaccine you have a greater risk of an adverse event than the risk reduction of hospitalization.
The study most certainly does not definitively conclude the risks outweigh the benefits, it suggests that there is a need for formal harm-benefit analysis. You claimed the vaccines were dangerous and killing people (when you weren’t arguing the completely incoherent “perfect for some, deadly for others”). Never did you mention anything close to adverse events vs reduced risk of hospitalization. You thought the media invented age adjusted mortality rates, I’m really supposed to believe you understood anything about reduced risk of hospitalization? Right!
Not saying it doesnt happen, I just personally dont know anyone who had severe adverse reactions. Of course most people w/ Covid now are vaxxed because a large number of the population is vaxxed. First time I had it my daughter and GF did not get it. I do not think either were vaxxed at the time. 2nd time I got it my daughter brought it home from daycare and all 3 of us had it. My daughter is unvaxxed and 11, my GF just had 2 shots and I had 3 total. At work its kinda been a mixed bag ranging from no shots to 4 shots, but we only have a handful of staff who have not had at least 2 shots or 1 J&J. Most residents are double boosted and only had one case in the last few months. Some homes in my area are back in COVID hell so hopefully we stay out of that.
Births are plunging EXACTLY on schedule, nine months after mass Covid vaccinations
alexberenson.substack.com
Singapore knows how to make its people behave.
The Asian city-state is famously uptight. It punishes criminals with caning and has prohibited chewing gum since 1992. (Do not under any circumstances deal drugs in Singapore; a 41-year-old man was sentenced to death after being caught with two pounds of cannabis in 2018.)
So when Singapore told its nearly 6 million residents to be vaccinated against Covid, it had very high compliance.
What is particularly interesting - though unsurprising - is how well Singapore stratified vaccine administration by age. As the chart below shows, in a few weeks in June and July 2021, nearly every Singaporean adult between 20-39 - childbearing age, essentially - received their first Covid vaccine jab.
Ministry of Health (MOH) is an innovative, people-centred organisation, committed to medical excellence, the promotion of good health, the reduction of illness and access to good and affordable healthcare for all Singaporeans, appropriate to their needs.
www.moh.gov.sg
The incredibly rapid uptake of vaccines among young Singaporean adults offers a natural experiment in the effect of mRNA shots on fertility. (Roughly 98 percent of all the jabs Singapore gave were mRNA from Pfizer or Moderna. Chinese vaccines used traditional inactivated virus technology made up the rest.)
You will not be surprised at this point to learn that Singapore publishes comprehensive figures on births and deaths every quarter.
Like other East Asian countries, Singapore is suffering severe baby bust. The average woman in Singapore has fewer than 1.2 children, barely half the birth rate needed to avert a long-term decline in population.
As low as the birth rate was, though, it had remained stable for a decade. Even Covid did not meaningfully change the number of births - 39,259 in 2019, 38,590 in 2020, and 38,672 in 2021.
In the first two months of 2022, Singapore received welcome news. Births actually rose about 7.5 percent.
Then came March. Again, Singapore began mass mRNA vaccinations of women (and men) of childbearing age in June 2021; March 2022 is exactly nine months later.
In March, the increase in births abruptly reversed. Between March and June 2022 - the most recent month for which figures are available - Singapore has recorded about 1,000 fewer live births compared to 2021, a decline of 8.5 percent. The drop has been consistent each month.
Most recent Singapore Demographics Bulletin (SDB), Annual Birth & Deaths Statistics and ICA Annual Statistics Report
ica.gov.sg
A 16 percent shift in birth rates practically overnight is, to say the least, highly unusual.
And Covid itself, or “long Covid,” whatever long Covid may be, cannot be blamed. Singapore had essentially no Covid until the fall of 2021 (well after mass vaccinations were complete, but that’s another story).
Alex Berenson is again misinterpreting/misrepresenting scientific data, this time saying this JAMA study shows vaccines “don’t stop Covid hospitalizations and deaths” in a recent substack post He is talking about this very nice cohort study published this week in JAMA Internal Medicine from the...
Alex Berenson is again misinterpreting/misrepresenting scientific data, this time saying this JAMA study shows vaccines “don’t stop Covid hospitalizations and deaths” in a recent substack post He is talking about this very nice cohort study published this week in JAMA Internal Medicine from the...
