he mis-spoke (as dems do a lot) - mRNA tech might be able to prevent cancer from spreading as it's purpose is to prevent the affected cell from replicating.
which is a bit of a stretch to preventing the spread of a virus.
Covid Vaccine
- Thread starter jitter77
- Start date
which is a bit of a stretch to preventing the spread of a virus.
The Most Common Side Effects Of The New Bivalent COVID Booster
Here's what you can expect when you get the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine and how you can ease any symptoms.
The Most Common Side Effects Of The New Bivalent COVID Booster
Here's what you can expect when you get the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine and how you can ease any symptoms.By
Jillian Wilson
Sep 13, 2022, 10:55 AM EDT|Updated Sep 14, 2022
As of Sept. 1, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention authorized an updated COVID-19 vaccine with the goal of fending off a surge in cases this fall and winter.
Moderna and Pfizer both have new bivalent vaccines that target the original strain of coronavirus and omicron subvariants (including the highly contagious BA.4 and BA.5), which have been rapidly spreading throughout the world for the last few months.
At this point, everyone 12 and over is eligible for the updated Pfizer booster, and those 18 and up are eligible for Moderna’s updated booster.
As with the last booster shot and the original vaccines, certain side effects are to be expected (and show that the booster is working!).
Here’s what to know about the side effects of these new bivalent vaccines.
The side effects resemble those of the earlier COVID shots.
“The anticipated side effects are really exactly what would be expected to occur after the previous vaccinations,” said Dr. William Schaffner, a professor of preventive medicine in the department of health policy at Vanderbilt University Medical Center.Those include headache, fatigue and soreness or redness at the injection site, Schaffner explained. The CDC also notes that a fever is a common side effect after booster shots. Chills, muscle pain and joint pain were also reported, according to the Food and Drug Administration.
It’s important to remember that these side effects are actually a good thing.
Yvonne Maldonado, a pediatric infectious disease professor at Stanford University, previously told HuffPost that “most vaccines will have some degree of minor side effects. It is, in fact, the body’s immune and inflammatory response to the vaccine.”
This immune response can present itself as redness at the injection site, headache or fever, Maldonado said.
You can expect swollen lymph nodes, too — but don’t delay a mammogram because of it.
Swollen lymph nodes, particularly in the armpit of the arm where you got the shot, can be expected, too, according to Medical News Today. This is another side effect that was widely reported after previous COVID vaccinations and boosters. When the vaccine was first available, some people reported that this issue interfered with their mammograms — swollen lymph nodes can resemble a sign of breast cancer on this kind of screening.Official guidance in 2021 said you should wait to schedule a mammogram after getting a COVID vaccine, but now, updated guidance states that “patients should not delay their screening mammogram because they were recently vaccinated,” according to a study published in the Radiological Society of North America’s journal.
If you have a mammogram scheduled soon after your COVID booster, just let your doctor know you were recently vaccinated so they’re aware of any potential issues with imaging.
If you experience these symptoms, you can take medicine to help relieve them.
Schaffner noted that if you’re experiencing any of these unpleasant symptoms, you can take a pain reliever like Tylenol to combat them. Over-the-counter anti-inflammatory drugs should make you feel better and allow you to go through your daily activities, he noted.He added that if your pain or discomfort gets bad enough, you should contact your health care provider. But adverse reactions are very rare and occur in a few cases per million.
Plus, most severe reactions happen within 15 minutes of shot administration, which is why you’ll be asked to wait for 15 or 30 minutes after your booster so medical staff can monitor you.
Plan to take it easy the following day.
If you’re someone who has dealt with tiredness, fever or headache after getting vaccinated — or if you’re just feeling anxious about the potential side effects — plan to get your shot when you don’t have much going on the next day, Schaffner said.In other words, if you’re nervous about side effects, you shouldn’t get the vaccine the day before a big event in case you end up feeling lousy.
All in all, it’s important to get the new COVID booster.
The most recent COVID subvariants are more contagious than ever and are only expected to grow more transmissible as the virus continues to mutate.Dr. Gregory Poland, a professor of medicine and infectious diseases at the Mayo Clinic, previously told HuffPost that the goal of a virus is to infect more and more people. So, it will mutate to become more and more contagious — which is what we’re seeing with the BA.4 and BA.5 subvariants.
The best way to protect yourself from omicron, which is the current dominant strain, and any future subvariants is by getting this updated bivalent booster.
Experts are still learning about COVID-19. The information in this story is what was known or available as of publication, but guidance can change as scientists discover more about the virus. Please check the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the most updated recommendations.
Is there anything this shitbag touches that doesn't turn to ****? 
All normal. All perfectly normal.
On Wednesday, a woman dropped dead at this Saskatoon Shoppers Drug Mart after her booster. A friend of mine witnessed it. Two days later, they are refusing to be honest with people about the potential harms.
Woman goes to the same location, asks the pharmacist about it. "I'm not allowed to comment on it."
Yep, of course not. The dangers of the jabs shall not be discussed.
Woman collapses and dies 15 minutes after Booster shot
On Wednesday, a woman dropped dead at this Saskatoon Shoppers Drug Mart after her booster. A friend of mine witnessed it. Two days later, they are refusing to be honest with people about the potential harms.
Woman goes to the same location, asks the pharmacist about it. "I'm not allowed to comment on it."
Yep, of course not. The dangers of the jabs shall not be discussed.
"THe ShoT wuRkz"
/Flog
/Flog
There were never any mandates!! /Flogtard
As always, there will be a good explanation for this. And it will be everything but vaccines.
news.sky.com
More people have been dying this year due to irregular heartbeat, official figures suggest
Excess deaths, or extra deaths, are the number of deaths that are above the long-term average for a particular week or month of the year.
More people have been dying this year due to irregular heartbeat, official figures suggest
Excess deaths, or extra deaths, are the number of deaths that are above the long-term average for a particular week or month of the year.
news.sky.com
More on the vaccines erasing natural immunity (you know, the report Floggy misinterpreted)
Bongino summarizes it below:
www.conservativereview.com
Why is it that years into this pandemic, the cases continue to proliferate and people seem to get the virus multiple times? A new study might shed light on this question, revealing a disturbing business model of the pharmaceutical companies to ensure that their product is always in demand because it serves as the arsonist while pretending to be the medical equivalent of a firefighter.
A new study published as a letter in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that not only did the Pfizer shots turn negative after five months during the Omicron wave, making a vaccinated individual more likely to get the virus, but they actually erased the immunity provided by prior infection, thereby ensuring that injected people can get COVID again. In a one-of-a-kind observational study of over 273,000 children, the study divided the groups into four camps: unvaccinated children with prior infection, unvaccinated children with no prior infection, vaccinated children with prior infection, and vaccinated children with no prior infection. What were the results?
Shockingly, the authors conclude, “The rapid decline in protection against omicron infection that was conferred by vaccination and previous infection provides support for booster vaccination.”
Except their study should demonstrate the exact opposite conclusion. Take a look at these two figures side by side:
The figure on the left (C) shows the gradual waning of immunity among unvaccinated children with prior infection. The figure on the right shows a precipitous waning of immunity among children who got COVID but then got vaccinated. Among those infected in November 2021 in the vaccine group, their level of protection went down to zero within a half-year, even though they already had the virus!
The authors suggest this is reason to constantly get boosters, but that would only make sense if boosters offered temporary protection but retained the protection accorded from prior infection. Clearly, this data shows that it slides the protection from natural infection backward, as was previously hypothesized from other academic papers.
Then again, if you look at their first two figures (A and B), they appear to show negative efficacy after five months for those without prior infection and just a slightly slower decline into negative territory among the vaccinated children who already had prior infection. In other words, either way – previously infected or not – the vaccine makes the children worse off.
This study lends credence to the findings of an NIH paper from earlier this year showing that only 40% of people with a previous infection in the vaccinated group produced anti-nucleocapsid antibodies, compared to 93% in the placebo group. The possible inhibition of N-antibodies, which are more comprehensive than the S(spike)-antibodies, might be a possible culprit for this negative efficacy even after having already been infected with the virus.
Another explanation might be original antigenic sin, which is the priming of the body to respond to new variants with an antigen to the old strain. A study from Stanford published in Cell earlier this year might shed light on this phenomenon. Researchers observed a decreased immune response to new variants among those vaccinated for the original strain because the shots are teaching the body to respond improperly. “We find that prior vaccination with Wuhan-Hu-1-like antigens followed by infection with Alpha or Delta variants gives rise to plasma antibody responses with apparent Wuhan-Hu-1-specific imprinting manifesting as relatively decreased responses to the variant virus epitopes, compared with unvaccinated patients infected with those variant viruses,” observed the Stanford pathologists. They note that the extent to which this causes original antigenic sin “will be an important topic of ongoing study.”
Important indeed! Just as with Pfizer’s oral therapeutic, Paxlovid, the more you use it, the more you need to use it! Behold the beauty of negative efficacy, rebounding of the virus, erasing natural immunity, and the promise of endless doses to stanch the bleeding.
What is further astounding is that even if the shots did work to prevent COVID, the upper bounds of illness severity most children present with is no worse than even the minor symptoms from the vaccine. Even putting aside the risk of serious injury, such as heart inflammation, the CDC’s own research shows that a massive percentage of toddlers who got the shots suffered what can only be described as flu-like symptoms. An unfathomable 50%-60% of children 6 months to two years of age experienced systemic reactions to one or both doses of either Pfizer or Moderna. This means they experienced some sort of illness beyond just pain at the injection site.
Furthermore, more than 15% of children 3-5 experienced a “health impact” from the second dose of Moderna, and anywhere from 5%-18% of children couldn’t go to school the next day, depending on the type and dose of shot. About 2% required medical care. Remember, this is for children and for Omicron, at a time when most already got the virus, but now the shot will give them up front COVID-like symptoms, possibly erase their prior immunity, thereby making them get the virus again, and exposing a certain percentage to life-altering adverse effects.
Could anyone possibly have manufactured a more Orwellian counterproductive vaccine if they tried on purpose?
Bongino summarizes it below:
Horowitz: Do the COVID shots erase natural immunity?
Why is it that years into this pandemic, the cases continue to proliferate and people seem to get the virus multiple times? A new study might shed light on this question, revealing a disturbing business model of the pharmaceutical companies to ensure that their product is always in demand...
www.conservativereview.com
Why is it that years into this pandemic, the cases continue to proliferate and people seem to get the virus multiple times? A new study might shed light on this question, revealing a disturbing business model of the pharmaceutical companies to ensure that their product is always in demand because it serves as the arsonist while pretending to be the medical equivalent of a firefighter.
A new study published as a letter in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that not only did the Pfizer shots turn negative after five months during the Omicron wave, making a vaccinated individual more likely to get the virus, but they actually erased the immunity provided by prior infection, thereby ensuring that injected people can get COVID again. In a one-of-a-kind observational study of over 273,000 children, the study divided the groups into four camps: unvaccinated children with prior infection, unvaccinated children with no prior infection, vaccinated children with prior infection, and vaccinated children with no prior infection. What were the results?
Shockingly, the authors conclude, “The rapid decline in protection against omicron infection that was conferred by vaccination and previous infection provides support for booster vaccination.”
Except their study should demonstrate the exact opposite conclusion. Take a look at these two figures side by side:
The figure on the left (C) shows the gradual waning of immunity among unvaccinated children with prior infection. The figure on the right shows a precipitous waning of immunity among children who got COVID but then got vaccinated. Among those infected in November 2021 in the vaccine group, their level of protection went down to zero within a half-year, even though they already had the virus!
The authors suggest this is reason to constantly get boosters, but that would only make sense if boosters offered temporary protection but retained the protection accorded from prior infection. Clearly, this data shows that it slides the protection from natural infection backward, as was previously hypothesized from other academic papers.
Then again, if you look at their first two figures (A and B), they appear to show negative efficacy after five months for those without prior infection and just a slightly slower decline into negative territory among the vaccinated children who already had prior infection. In other words, either way – previously infected or not – the vaccine makes the children worse off.
This study lends credence to the findings of an NIH paper from earlier this year showing that only 40% of people with a previous infection in the vaccinated group produced anti-nucleocapsid antibodies, compared to 93% in the placebo group. The possible inhibition of N-antibodies, which are more comprehensive than the S(spike)-antibodies, might be a possible culprit for this negative efficacy even after having already been infected with the virus.
Another explanation might be original antigenic sin, which is the priming of the body to respond to new variants with an antigen to the old strain. A study from Stanford published in Cell earlier this year might shed light on this phenomenon. Researchers observed a decreased immune response to new variants among those vaccinated for the original strain because the shots are teaching the body to respond improperly. “We find that prior vaccination with Wuhan-Hu-1-like antigens followed by infection with Alpha or Delta variants gives rise to plasma antibody responses with apparent Wuhan-Hu-1-specific imprinting manifesting as relatively decreased responses to the variant virus epitopes, compared with unvaccinated patients infected with those variant viruses,” observed the Stanford pathologists. They note that the extent to which this causes original antigenic sin “will be an important topic of ongoing study.”
Important indeed! Just as with Pfizer’s oral therapeutic, Paxlovid, the more you use it, the more you need to use it! Behold the beauty of negative efficacy, rebounding of the virus, erasing natural immunity, and the promise of endless doses to stanch the bleeding.
What is further astounding is that even if the shots did work to prevent COVID, the upper bounds of illness severity most children present with is no worse than even the minor symptoms from the vaccine. Even putting aside the risk of serious injury, such as heart inflammation, the CDC’s own research shows that a massive percentage of toddlers who got the shots suffered what can only be described as flu-like symptoms. An unfathomable 50%-60% of children 6 months to two years of age experienced systemic reactions to one or both doses of either Pfizer or Moderna. This means they experienced some sort of illness beyond just pain at the injection site.
Furthermore, more than 15% of children 3-5 experienced a “health impact” from the second dose of Moderna, and anywhere from 5%-18% of children couldn’t go to school the next day, depending on the type and dose of shot. About 2% required medical care. Remember, this is for children and for Omicron, at a time when most already got the virus, but now the shot will give them up front COVID-like symptoms, possibly erase their prior immunity, thereby making them get the virus again, and exposing a certain percentage to life-altering adverse effects.
Could anyone possibly have manufactured a more Orwellian counterproductive vaccine if they tried on purpose?
This mEDikAL DoKturr (Dr. Scot Youngblood) gave this 15 minute presentation to the San Diego City Council days ago. Epic. Cites innumerable studies. I'm not sure how anyone with half a brain can watch this and not see just how bad these vaccines are.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 18,579
- Reaction score
- 29,923
- Points
- 113
- Location
- The nearest Steelers bar.
Science, *******: Masking kids did NOTHING to slow down the spread of the Chinese flu.
Study Reveals Masking Kids In School Made 'No Significant Difference' In Stopping COVID Spread.
The use of face masks in classrooms made “no significant difference” in COVID-19 infection rates, according to a new study.
thenationalpulse.com
Fortunately, however, the masking of kids did have the wonderful side effects of stunted social interaction, reduced language development, and an overall decline in student performance, so there's that.
Many were suckered into getting the shot. In other cases the government as well as private employers required it. Extortion. Now many illnesses and even deaths are occurring. Media covers up the dangers. Now, many that took the shot are regretting that act. They don't want to talk about it or think about it.
And my boss(mid 40's) had to make another trip to the er Friday for irregular heartbeat.
First episode in his life happened 3 or 4 days after his first shot. Glad I lucked out with no side effects after getting 2 jabbies. No more.
I'll take natural immunity for free Alex.
First episode in his life happened 3 or 4 days after his first shot. Glad I lucked out with no side effects after getting 2 jabbies. No more.
I'll take natural immunity for free Alex.
Science, *******: Masking kids did NOTHING to slow down the spread of the Chinese flu.
Study Reveals Masking Kids In School Made 'No Significant Difference' In Stopping COVID Spread.
The use of face masks in classrooms made “no significant difference” in COVID-19 infection rates, according to a new study.
Fortunately, however, the masking of kids did have the wonderful side effects of stunted social interaction, reduced language development, and an overall decline in student performance, so there's that.
"Only 599K students? That's not real study. MEDICAL DOCTORS encourage masks!!"
In the "**** you can't make up file" we find....
Clinical Considerations: Myocarditis after mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines | CDC
Clinical considerations for myocarditis and pericarditis after receipt of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines among adolescents and young adults.
www.cdc.gov
Clearly she had monkey pox
Layer …….after layer. Soon.View attachment 9603
Clinical Considerations: Myocarditis after mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines | CDC
Clinical considerations for myocarditis and pericarditis after receipt of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines among adolescents and young adults.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 9,052
- Reaction score
- 11,748
- Points
- 113
Hey Tim,
Don't forget to tell dopey Flog to go back about 4,5,6 months when some folks on this very thread got to read the Pfizer data and pointed out the Negative Efficacy of the Jabby jab Stabby stab. Well ahead of the medical establishment, who feel compelled to wait for many data points to make pronouncements, unless it is the FDA approving untested flu shots with faulty data sets.
He knows. And he's departed after his most recent ***-whooping about the NEJM article. Suspect he may make it back for some more abuse later.
Long, damning. The massive number of volunteers keep pouring through the Pfizer documents. Just posting a lead in. It's long, but worth the read.
naomiwolf.substack.com
The worst that can happen to the human species, is happening.
The War Room/DailyClout’s Pfizer Documents Research Volunteers — a group of medical and scientific experts who have selflessly stepped up to analyze the tens of thousands of formerly internal Pfizer documents released under court order subsequent to a lawsuit by Aaron Siri’s firm, Siri & Glimstad, and a FOIA by Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency — have now fully demonstrated that Pfizer’s mRNA vaccines target human reproduction in comprehensive, likely irreversible ways.
Our 3,250 research volunteers, in 39 fully cited reports to date, have documented evidence of what I’ve been calling “360 degrees of harm” to reproduction.
The Pfizer documents reveal monstrous damage to menstruation, harm to the testes and epididymis, harms to the penis, horrible harm to the ova and ovaries, mechanisms for compromising the placenta, contamination of amniotic fluid, and damage to newborns. They reveal that four women’s breast milk turned blue-green. They reveal injuries to at least one newborn that extend to death (or murder) from ingesting tainted breast milk. They reveal horrific levels of miscarriages. They reveal that Pfizer defined “exposure” to the vaccine as including sexual intercourse, especially at conception. They reveal a weird focus on mammalian sexual and reproductive issues.
All of these horrors make extended appearances in the Pfizer documents, which were never expected to see the light of day. https://dailyclout.io/category/campaigns/pfizer-documents-analysis/
Soon humanity will realize that the worst thing ever to happen to it, has taken place.
.....read more inside the link
Destroying Women, Poisoning Breast Milk, Murdering Babies; and Hiding the Truth
Conflicted Wire Services; Press Release Distributor, Spotify, BBC, Censored, Attacked Us --for our Pfizer Reports' Info re mRNA Vaccine Destruction of Pregnant Women, Fetuses, Babies
naomiwolf.substack.com
The worst that can happen to the human species, is happening.
The War Room/DailyClout’s Pfizer Documents Research Volunteers — a group of medical and scientific experts who have selflessly stepped up to analyze the tens of thousands of formerly internal Pfizer documents released under court order subsequent to a lawsuit by Aaron Siri’s firm, Siri & Glimstad, and a FOIA by Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency — have now fully demonstrated that Pfizer’s mRNA vaccines target human reproduction in comprehensive, likely irreversible ways.
Our 3,250 research volunteers, in 39 fully cited reports to date, have documented evidence of what I’ve been calling “360 degrees of harm” to reproduction.
The Pfizer documents reveal monstrous damage to menstruation, harm to the testes and epididymis, harms to the penis, horrible harm to the ova and ovaries, mechanisms for compromising the placenta, contamination of amniotic fluid, and damage to newborns. They reveal that four women’s breast milk turned blue-green. They reveal injuries to at least one newborn that extend to death (or murder) from ingesting tainted breast milk. They reveal horrific levels of miscarriages. They reveal that Pfizer defined “exposure” to the vaccine as including sexual intercourse, especially at conception. They reveal a weird focus on mammalian sexual and reproductive issues.
All of these horrors make extended appearances in the Pfizer documents, which were never expected to see the light of day. https://dailyclout.io/category/campaigns/pfizer-documents-analysis/
Soon humanity will realize that the worst thing ever to happen to it, has taken place.
.....read more inside the link
Heartbreaking
""harms to the penis,""Long, damning. The massive number of volunteers keep pouring through the Pfizer documents. Just posting a lead in. It's long, but worth the read.
Destroying Women, Poisoning Breast Milk, Murdering Babies; and Hiding the Truth
Conflicted Wire Services; Press Release Distributor, Spotify, BBC, Censored, Attacked Us --for our Pfizer Reports' Info re mRNA Vaccine Destruction of Pregnant Women, Fetuses, Babies
The worst that can happen to the human species, is happening.
The War Room/DailyClout’s Pfizer Documents Research Volunteers — a group of medical and scientific experts who have selflessly stepped up to analyze the tens of thousands of formerly internal Pfizer documents released under court order subsequent to a lawsuit by Aaron Siri’s firm, Siri & Glimstad, and a FOIA by Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency — have now fully demonstrated that Pfizer’s mRNA vaccines target human reproduction in comprehensive, likely irreversible ways.
Our 3,250 research volunteers, in 39 fully cited reports to date, have documented evidence of what I’ve been calling “360 degrees of harm” to reproduction.
The Pfizer documents reveal monstrous damage to menstruation, harm to the testes and epididymis, harms to the penis, horrible harm to the ova and ovaries, mechanisms for compromising the placenta, contamination of amniotic fluid, and damage to newborns. They reveal that four women’s breast milk turned blue-green. They reveal injuries to at least one newborn that extend to death (or murder) from ingesting tainted breast milk. They reveal horrific levels of miscarriages. They reveal that Pfizer defined “exposure” to the vaccine as including sexual intercourse, especially at conception. They reveal a weird focus on mammalian sexual and reproductive issues.
All of these horrors make extended appearances in the Pfizer documents, which were never expected to see the light of day. https://dailyclout.io/category/campaigns/pfizer-documents-analysis/
Soon humanity will realize that the worst thing ever to happen to it, has taken place.
.....read more inside the link
WHAT?!!! Mother *******!!
which is why they're pushing transgenderism.
any guy with "harm to the penis" can just get it cut off and be a woman, even though we don't have a set defined definition of what a woman is, and we'll burn down society until it moves past transgender-phobia where straight men are then dating women who used to be men but got their hang down cut off because they took a shot that made their dangle-down not stand at attention.
all simple. very simple.
Similar threads
