This is truly a beautiful, "both-sided" view of the vaccines. Both sides of the debate will get something from this article.
I post it because rightfully, as the authors say...we should be investigating thoroughly what is happening and they explain why such a large percentage of Americans now distrust their Government and Health agencies - unlike other countries.
"Fair and Balanced"
View attachment 10470
Tim,
Thanks for posting this. I am grateful for useful discourse.
Many questions still need answers:
1) why are these writers, medical professionals, not aware that all new drugs have phase 1, 2, 3, and 4 clinical AND experiential studies done? Even approved drugs can get re-labelled, removed, etc. as actual human experience differs from expectations upon approval. Further, why do they not call into account those at the pharmaceutical companies and those in regulatory authority for their lack of action? While it is useful to point out the problems, there is still no call for accountability.
2) Zona pointed out the part about that Pfizer is late in their own investigation of their own drug's cardiovascular issues. Why do the authors not question the clear bias of Pfizer acting as Inspector Clouseau AND note that FDA does not seem to care that they are at least 6 weeks LATE in completion of their study.
3) There is no attempt to demonstrate the real dollar and implied dollar costs of these issues. Why not?
4) They question FDA, CDC, Walensky, Fauci, the Biden Administration, etc. actions, but make no direct ask for responses, or judgements from the lack of response. For instance, noting that it is terrible that colleges still require students to get more covid shots for unreasonable compliance is obvious, but the authors do not direct this anywhere. They actually say "That means that these schools are violating the rights of bodily autonomy in young people, and increasing their risk of a vaccine side effect for no purpose. " and then change course in the article.
Many ideas are started, but unfinished.
It gives the reader an idea of the problems, yet offers no solutions or accountability.
So, for me, this seems like a trial balloon article, to get some of the negatives out there, with some names, but with nothing of meaning in terms of asking for responses or accountability.
Its a survey article on some of the bad covid shot ****, but not all, with no other conclusion than "so Americans are turning to Twitter rather than the CDC".
I am not really sure this helps that much.