• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Covid Vaccine

Of course. "But, SUBSTACK!!" There's a embedded study.


URGENT: mRNAs jabs may have caused tens of millions of serious new health problems worldwide, a huge peer-reviewed study shows​

Covid vaccines are linked to a 20 percent rise in new diagnoses for at least three months after vaccination; a second report finds even higher risks for people with preexisting autoimmune problems


https://www.nature.com/articles/s44161-022-00177-8 <-----study

URGENT: mRNAs jabs may have caused tens of millions of serious new health problems worldwide, a huge peer-reviewed study shows​

Covid vaccines are linked to a 20 percent rise in new diagnoses for at least three months after vaccination; a second report finds even higher risks for people with preexisting autoimmune problems​


Adults have sharply higher risks of being diagnosed with heart, skin, and psychiatric conditions for at least 90 days after they receive Covid jabs, a peer-reviewed study of almost 300,000 people in California has shown.

The researchers examined new diagnoses given to the same people before and after they were vaccinated to see whether the shots changed the risk of new health problems.

They found that people were about 21 percent more likely to receive a new diagnosis in the three months after a shot, compared to the three months before. With almost 240 million American adults jabbed, the rise translates into millions of extra new medical problems found in the months after vaccination, and tens of millions worldwide.

Serious conditions such as hypertension were about 25 percent more likely to be diagnosed in the three months following a shot than the three months before, the researchers found.

Depression, eczema, diabetes, and cellulitis were 10 to 20 percent more likely.

Myocarditis diagnoses had the highest additional risk. They were about 2.6 times as likely overall, with an even higher risk in men.
Myocarditis is a known side effect of the mRNAs, so the fact it had a particularly high rate of extra diagnoses provides strong evidence that the signal the researchers found was real.

Overall, the researchers reported that the 284,000 Covid-vaccinated adults they examined received almost 6,000 additional diagnoses of health conditions in the 90 days after being jabbed compared to the 90 days before.

With about 237 million American adults vaccinated, that estimate would translate into about 5 million extra diagnoses for problems like diabetes in the three months following the shots. Worldwide, the number could be up to 25 million.

In the chart below, the blue column is the risk someone will be diagnosed with a new condition following vaccination, compared to the risk before.

For example, about 2,560 out of the 284,000 people were diagnosed with hypertension up to three months after vaccination, compared to 2,080 of the same people up to three months before. The extra 480 cases translated into a 23 percent higher risk of hypertension following vaccination. Because the number of cases was so high, the risk was highly statistically significant, meaning the finding probably was not due to chance.

https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fcd13c958-0e32-4c8a-9052-9ba33d1db035_1846x1534.jpeg



The study’s researchers are a group from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, a big hospital system in Los Angeles. Their findings were published in Nature Cardiovascular Research in December. But the paper has received almost no attention, a common response to reports that raise questions about the safety of the vaccines.

The researchers also noted that in a smaller sample of adults infected with Covid, new diagnoses for health conditions rose about 40 percent in the three months after infection compared to the three months before.

Meanwhile, researchers in Hong Kong independently found an even sharper increase in autoimmune “flares” following Covid shots.

The risk of new episodes of lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, and other serious autoimmune conditions roughly doubled following the shots in a group of 562 patients with those conditions they followed, compared to 1,055 who did not. The paper was published February 17 in the Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Immunology.


But not all vaccines carried the autoimmune risk.

Only mRNA shots did. Chinese-style inactivated virus vaccines did not. Hong Kong used both types of jabs, making a direct comparison possible. The researchers suggested that the mRNA shots cause the flares by stimulating a specific immune receptor that causes the release of inflammatory cytokines.

“Risk-benefit considerations in patients with active rheumatic disease may favor inactivated virus rather than mRNA vaccines to avoid the risk of flare-ups of any severity,” the researchers wrote.
 
People worship this man...who destroyed so much of this nation.

Fauci ‘paid a scientist $18 Million’ to change opinion on Covid​


The man on the left is Kristian Andersen, a British scientist who emailed Fauci 1/31/20, saying the virus looks lab-made. The man on the right is Kristian Andersen, the guy who Fauci called on 2/1/20 and ordered to publicly say it wasn’t lab-made, which he did. Fauci then gave him $1.88M grant, +$16.5M funding

covid-fauci-fund.jpg



Recently released e-mails show that Dr. Anthony Fauci knew key facts about the origins of COVID-19 in January 2020. But at that critical time, when the country was first learning about the virus, Dr. Fauci chose not to share the facts with Americans. Instead, he acted to conceal them.

On January 31, 2020, at 10:32 p.m., Dr. Fauci received an email from British researcher, Dr. Kristian Andersen. Dr. Andersen has received millions of dollars in grants from the NIH. In the email, he warned Dr. Fauci:

[O]ne has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered . . . Eddie [Holmes], Bob [Garry], Mike [Ferguson] and myself all find the genome inconsistent with evolutionary theory.
Two hours later, at 12:29 a.m. on February 1, Dr. Fauci emailed his long-time deputy, Dr. Hugh Auchincloss. In the email, Dr. Fauci attached a paper written by Dr. Ralph Baric and Dr. Zhengli-Li Shi – the so-called “bat woman” from Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). The paper highlighted taxpayer-funded gain-of-function research on coronaviruses conducted by the WIV. Dr. Fauci told Dr. Auchincloss:

It is essential that we speak this [morning]. Keep your cell phone on . . . read this paper . . . you will have tasks today that must be done.
Urgency. Intensity.

Two hours later, at 2:48 a.m., Dr. Fauci sent another email, to Dr. Robert Kadlec. Dr. Kadlec was the Trump-appointed Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response at the Department of Health and Human Services. Attached to this email was an article that downplayed the lab leak and advocated for an evolutionary origin to COVID-19. Dr. Fauci simply wrote:

Bob: This came out today. Gives a balanced view.
No urgency. No intensity.

Why was Dr. Fauci so concerned when emailing his deputy but so calm when emailing his boss? Why didn’t he send Dr. Kadlec the Baric-Shi paper? The paper that supported the original message from Dr. Andersen that COVID-19 looked engineered, was inconsistent with evolutionary theory, and linked American tax dollars to gain of function research at the WIV.

Later that morning, at 11:47 a.m., Dr. Auchincloss replied to Dr. Fauci:

The paper you sent me says the experiments were performed before the gain-of-function pause but have since been reviewed and approved by NIH. Not sure what this means since [we are] sure that no coronavirus work has gone through the P3 framework. [We] will try to determine if we have any distant ties to this work abroad.
Wow! Dr. Auchincloss’ email confirms Dr. Fauci’s worst fear. American tax dollars funded gain of function research at the WIV and that research didn’t go through proper oversight (the P3 framework).

Dr. Fauci already knew there was a lethal virus on the loose in Wuhan, China. In just 13 hours, between 10:32 p.m. January 31, 2020, and 11:47 a.m. February 1, 2020, Dr. Fauci learned three additional facts.

First, Dr. Fauci knew that American taxpayers had helped to fund dangerous gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China.

Second, Dr. Fauci knew this research funding did not go through the government’s required safety review process — a process known as the P3 framework.

Third, Dr. Fauci knew that the virus “looked…engineered” and seemed to be “inconsistent with evolutionary theory.”

What did he do next?

He organized a conference call for the evening of February 1, 2020. On the call were 11 virologists from around the world, including Dr. Andersen who sent Dr. Fauci the email less than 24 hours earlier. Almost all the participants on the call had previously been awarded American taxpayer-funded grants by Dr. Fauci.

Who was not on the call?

Dr. Kadlec, Dr. Fauci’s superior at HHS.

Dr. Robert Redfield, Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Dr. Brett Giroir, Assistant Secretary for Health.

Or Dr. Birx, the soon-to-be COVID-19 Response Coordinator.

In fact, there was not a single U.S. government official on the call, except for Dr. Fauci.

What happened on the call? We don’t know. All of the emails discussing the call are redacted.

However, we do know what happened four days later. Dr. Andersen, the virologist who sent the original 10:32 p.m. email on January 31, went public with this statement:

“The main crackpot theories going around at the moment relate to this virus being somehow engineered . . . and that is demonstrably false.

In four days, Dr. Andersen flipped 180 degrees! The only intervening event appears to be the conference call with Dr. Fauci.

In addition, over the next few weeks, Dr. Andersen and three others on the conference call penned an article in Nature Medicine. The article included the definitive statement, that “Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct . . . “

In just three weeks, Dr. Andersen went from COVID-19 “looks…engineered” to “[it] is not a laboratory construct.”

Other emails also show that before this article was published, Dr. Andersen wrote to Dr. Fauci and offered to let him edit the article.

Finally, and maybe most importantly, after the article was published, Dr. Fauci cited it in a White House press briefing as an authoritative source when asked about the virus’ origins. Dr. Fauci cited the very article he put in motion on the conference call, and he was allowed to edit.

Dr. Fauci knew COVID-19 likely came from the WIV. He knew American taxpayers funded gain of function research on coronaviruses at the WIV. He knew this funding bypassed required oversight. And he knew the virus “looked…engineered” and was “inconsistent with evolutionary theory.” And he knew all this on February 1, 2020.

Information of this magnitude should have been taken directly to the President of the United States. Instead, Dr. Fauci organized a conference call with 11 non-governmental virologists to cover his tracks.

I believe it was on this call, they decided to manufacture the article in an attempt to conceal their involvement in gain of function research at the WIV. These 11 unelected scientists decided to hide the truth from the American people for more than a year.

Maybe I’m wrong. Maybe it didn’t happen this way. Maybe there’s a good explanation for why Dr. Fauci did what he did. Unfortunately, Dr. Fauci refuses to testify. Every American should be asking why.
 
Other scientists paid off by Fauci. Listen to the esteemed Dr Makary.

 
Feb update on athletes.

February 2023 – (Day/Month/Year)​

  1. 20/02/2023 Nevada, USA Dead
    Ryan Keeler (20), UNLV American Football player
    died unexpectedly. News Story News Story2 News Story3 News Story4
  2. 16/02/2023 Brazil
    Philipe Sampaio (28), Botafogo Footballer collapsed 15 minutes into a game against Vasco da Gama. An ambulance took him to hospital. News Story News Story2 News Story3 News Story4
  3. 15/02/2023 Mississippi, USA
    Kaseem Vauls (21), Jackson State University American Football player went to the medical centre Tuesday night suffering from stomach pains. Suffered a cardiac arrest the next morning. News Story News Story2 News Story3 News Story4
  4. 11/02/2023 Belgium Dead
    Arne Espeel (25), Winkel Sport B football goalkeeper
    collapsed just after saving a penalty, when he felt unwell. He was revived and taken to hospital, but died soon after. News Story News Story2 News Story3 News Story4
  5. 11/02/2023 Netherlands
    Adrie Poldervaart (52), former OHVV Oudenhorn Footballer and now manager of De Graafschap has developed Guillain-Barré disease and struggles to walk. News Story News Story2 News Story3 News Story4
  6. 10/02/2023 New Jersey, USA Dead
    Elijah Jordan Brown-Garcia (12), American Football player
    collapsed during light football training. No-one around knew CPR so they waited for an ambulance, which was delayed. At the hospital, he was pronounced dead. News Story News Story2 News Story3
  7. 10/02/2023 Finland
    Venla Lehtonen (27), Biathlon competitor “froze” due to a cardiac arrhythmia on the last hill and stopped the women’s sprint race at the World Championships in Germany. News Story News Story2 News Story3 News Story4
  8. 07/02/2023 Greece Dead
    Vassilis Christodoulou (21), Knights of Charilaou basketball player suffered a sudden cardiac arrest at home alone and died.
    News Story News Story2 News Story3
  9. 07/02/2023 Michigan, USA Dead
    Cartier Woods (18), Basketball player at Northwestern High School in Detroit
    , Michigan suffered a cardiac arrest during a basketball game against Fredrick Douglass Academy. He died in hospital one week later. News Story News Story2 News Story3 News Story4
  10. 06/02/2023 Canada Dead
    William Caron-Cabrera (17), high school American football player
    in Canada died in his sleep due to a cardiac arrest. News Story News Story2 News Story3 News Story4
  11. 05/02/2023 Spain Dead
    Ado Hadi (21), Nigerian CD Madridejos Football player
    collapsed in the middle of a match against SP Cabanillas. Resuscitation attempts failed and he died. News Story News Story2 News Story3 News Story4
  12. 04/02/2023 Arizona, USA Dead
    Pierre Lipton (26), star performer academically and in sport.
    He collapsed after crossing the finish line of the Meza Marathon in Arizona, a personal best time. He received immediate attention from a paramedic but was unable to be saved. News Story News Story2 News Story3 News Story4
 
Further update by Ed Dowd on insurance casualty figures.

Breaking by Ed Dowd: Society of Actuaries Excess Death Numbers Released for December – In Age Group Under 44, Number Is 43% Higher Than Expected​


Ed Dowd, an equity investment executive, went on The War Room back in March 2022 with an explosive report on the excess number of deaths recorded in the US since the introduction of the mandatory experimental vaccines.

Back in March [2022] Dowd said that U.S. millennials, aged 25-44, experienced a record-setting 84% increase in excess mortality during the final four months of 2021.


According to Ed Dowd, the latest numbers from August revealed an excess mortality rate of 36% for millennials.

“So, just to give you some idea of the number I said on your show a couple of weeks ago and to Senator Ron Johnson, there was about 1.2 million we calculated in September. It’s now about 1.7 million starting about February 2021 thru November of 2022. 1.7 employed people have become disabled and that’s a big number" said Dowd.

On Tuesday Ed Dowd released the Society of Actuary’s (SOA) excess deaths numbers for the 4th quarter of 2022.

In December the SOA found a 43% increase in excess deaths than what was expected for those under 45.

This is a stunning number and it is significantly higher than in October when the number was 13% for those under 45 years of age.



Actuaries are worried about the upcoming strain on hospitals.

 

Attachments

  • 1677775882676.png
    1677775882676.png
    217.3 KB · Views: 0
A prominent Japanese doctor reports adverse effects after the jab. Lots of voices speaking out. Our media doesn't cover it.
 
Becoming a Jon Stewart fan, due to his take on COVID.

The "swift" backlash he received from Libs after his appearance on Colberts show, and his response via podcast.
Saying the same things conservatives have been saying for years.

 
Becoming a Jon Stewart fan, due to his take on COVID.

The "swift" backlash he received from Libs after his appearance on Colberts show, and his response via podcast.
Saying the same things conservatives have been saying for years.


First Bill Maher, and now Jon Stewart, when will this madness end????
 
First Bill Maher, and now Jon Stewart, when will this madness end????

You've heard the old saying..."If you’re not a liberal when you’re 25, you have no heart. If you’re not a conservative by the time you’re 35, you have no brain."

It's just that both Maher and Stewart happen to be late bloomers.
 

Another week, another 57 Americans reported dead to VAERS (v64 last week) amongst 1,841 adverse events (v 1,691 last week)​


From here and here there were 57 deaths amongst 1,841 adverse events (US only) reported for the week ended 24 February 2023. This lifts the cumulative number of US deaths reported to VAERS to 17,024 and the number of adverse events to 940,017.

Total reports to VAERS from all round the world (including the US) for doses made by US companies reporting to the FDA/CDC, were for another 98 deaths amongst 2,889 adverse events for the week, lifting cumulative reports of death to 34,576 amongst 1,527,371 adverse events.

The latest update for deaths and injuries reported to the European adverse events reporting system maintained by the EMA, EUDRA, to 25 February 2023 is here:

50,663 DEAD and 5,315,063 Injured Following COVID-19 Vaccines in European Database of Adverse Reactions - Vaccine Impact

For the US only, assuming an Under-Reporting Factor (URF) of 40, this would represent 680,960 deaths amongst 37.6 million adverse events. Globally, deaths for companies subject to CDC/FDA reporting to the US VAERS would be 1,383,040 amongst adverse events of 61.1 million injuries.

672 million doses have been administered in the US and 13.32 billion doses globally.

Note that 70% of the world’s 8 billion people have now received at least one dose. This works out an average of 2.4 doses each for the 5.6 billion that have received at least one dose.

The casualties reported to the US - adjusted for a URF of 40 - is not an estimate of deaths and injuries globally from C19 injections of all sorts (e.g. viral vector or mRNA injections) just the casualties from companies reporting in to the US VAERS regulated by the CDC/FDA (mostly Pfizer BioNTech, Moderna, Novavax and JnJ).

The US VAERS plus EU EUDRA numbers can be multiplied by around 6-8 to “globalize” estimated deaths and injuries and then multiplied by 40 to adjust for the URF.

India mostly uses viral vector injections (EUDRA shows these to be even more deadly than mRNA). China does not publish adverse event data – but I doubt that it would be backward in coming forward if China’s vaccines were more effective and safer than either viral vector or mRNA injections. India and China are far the biggest “injectors” of C19 vaccines with 5.6 billion doses administered between them out of 13.32 billion doses administered in total globally.

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Vaccinations - Our World in Data

From here, the number of US doses administered increased by 0.5 million (down another 0.1 million from last week) to 671.6 million. 0.3 million of this 0.5 million were bivalent doses, increasing the number of bivalent doses administered since authorization on 31 August 2022, to 53.6 million.

The number of tots subject to attempted murder and maiming by their parents increased by 20,000 over the week (double last week and seemingly reverting to the constant spreadsheet entry of 20,000 over prior weeks, after dipping to 10,000 a week for a few weeks) over the week to 1.87 million, since authorization on 18 June 2022 (out of around 22.5 million tots in the US).

Out of yet another 2.0 million doses shipped around the US last week (same as last week) just 0.5 million were used, compared to 0.6 million last week). The number of unused doses (disposed of or sitting in US freezers) is now 293 million (v 291.5 million last week) almost all of which are obsolete as they have been replaced by bivalent doses.

For the US, in total, 965 million doses have been shipped with 672 million doses administered,, leaving 293 million unused. The percentage of unused doses out of those shipped remained at a whopping 30%.

The vast majority of these 293 million doses are obsolete and either past or approaching their “use by” dates. The US had ordered around 1.22 billion a few months ago, so there is, potentially, at least another quarter billion doses on the way, presumably NOT for the old monovalent doses, but all for the new and disproved bivalent doses.

Dominant variants according to the CDC are here:

CDC COVID Data Tracker: Variant Proportions



Note the bivalent C19 mRNA injections target the original and BA4/BA5 variants that no longer exist.

We should be seeing stories of the destruction (via highly specialized incinerators) of around 250 million doses in the US shortly, if they have not been disposed of already. (20 bucks each = the odd 5 billion bucks up in smoke). This same phenomenon applies globally – mass destruction of obsolete doses. We saw stories la few weeks ago that other devices are past their “use by” dates when Germany announced its intentions to destroy 800 million stale masks. Australia also announced that it would be destroying 27 million of its obsolete doses for its population of 26 million.

From here, Europe has 458 million unused doses (down!!) 1 million since the last update. The US plus EU alone have almost three quarters of a billion unused doses (749 million).

Assuming the US + EU represents 25% of the global C19 mRNA market by population, there could be a whopping 4 billion doses in freezers elsewhere that need to be incinerated – if they have not been already.
 
Boom.



"If you have an economic system in which pharmaceutical companies benefit from medical emergencies, where a military industrial complex benefits from war...you are going to generate states of perpetual crisis"
 
People are starting to wake up. Watch Dr. Tina Peters talk about the stillborn and miscarriage rates with Pfizer's data and real world data.

 
I don't know anyone who died or suffered adverse effects from the jab, but then again it took quite a long time before someone I knew personally died from COVID.
 
The evidence on the vaccines affecting reproduction continue to mount...negatively.

Number of Births in England Falls by 11.9% in 2022​


After months of waiting, the U.K. Health Security Agency (UKHSA) has updated its ‘Vaccination in pregnancy’ tables in its ‘COVID-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report’.

Many of us have been complaining that the tables have not been updated for over six months, with the last set of data inputted in June 2022. Maybe it was working together with the ONS, which updated its ‘deaths by vaccination status’ data last week. The UKHSA data have now been updated to November 2022. I don’t understand why there is still such a big delay, but any update is better that nothing.

Previously, it has been noted that there were big drops in births when comparing 2022 with 2021. I can recall reading someone connected with the UKHSA or ONS saying that this was probably due to a data lag. Well, the updated data are here and they are still as worrying as before. The updated data have slightly decreased the number of births in 2021 and slightly increased the number in 2022, but not by much.

As the data only run until November 2022, I compared the number of women giving birth up to November 2021 with the number in 2022. In total between January and November there were 478,382 births in 2021 and 421,284 in 2022. That’s 57,098 fewer births in 2022, which is a drop of 11.9%.

image-11-1024x557.png

This next chart shows the percentage decrease in births by month. As you can see, the biggest decrease occurred in month 9 (September) with a decrease of 15.7%

image-12-1024x543.png

The vaccine surveillance report’s own graph shows this drop. I have drawn a red line to show where the drop off starts, which coincidentally matches the peak of the first dose in pregnancy figures.

image-13.png

The report emphasises that there is nothing to worry about and that studies have shown the vaccine is safe in pregnancy. It presents a number of graphs showing:

  • percentage of live-born babies at term without low birthweight;
  • percentage of live-born babies at term without low birthweight by age;
  • stillbirths;
  • low birthweights; and
  • premature births.
Its graphs attempt to show that there isn’t much difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated mothers. However, in my opinion, these data don’t show much and could be considered disingenuous because the authors never compare with unvaccinated women. Instead they use the term “no doses in pregnancy”. This means instead of being a purely unvaccinated control group, women who were vaccinated before they were pregnant are lumped in the same group.

Next, I analysed the drop in births by ethnicity. I used the September to November 2021 data from the week 11 2021 vaccine surveillance report and compared with the September to November 2022 data in this latest report.

(A note to the UKHSA – your table columns are still labelled “April to June 2022” whilst the table heading says “September to November 2022”. Clearly a cut and paste job which doesn’t instil confidence with such an important dataset.)

The report compares births in Asian, black, mixed, other, unknown and white women.

image-14-1024x499.png

There is a big increase in ‘other’ births but in reality the difference is just a few thousand. The rest of the categories show drops ranging from -2.5% in black women to -38.7% in mixed race women. The vaccination rates at the time of delivery are as follows: Asian (75.9%). Black (53.9%), Mixed (62.1%), Other (64.9%), White (78%) and Unknown (58.9%).

So there is no clear pattern between percentage of women vaccinated and changes in number of births.

Next, looking at deprivation with 1 being most deprived and 5 the least deprived.

image-15-1024x520.png

This time there is a clear pattern between deprivation status, vaccination status and decrease in births. Vaccination rates by deprivation status are as follows: 1 most deprived (63.7%), 2 (71.2%), 3 (77.8%), 4 (83.3%), 5 least deprived (87.2%).

Interestingly, the more deprived, the lower the birth rate drop. This is also coincides with a lower percentage of women vaccinated.

And finally by age.

image-16-1024x478.png

Here the under 20s show an increase whilst the other age groups drop in number of births. The greatest drop is in the 30-34 year olds at minus-17.7%. Vaccination rates for this group are as follows: under 20s (46.8%), 20-24 (61.7%), 25-29 (69.8%), 30-34 (79.8%), 35-39 (82.7%), 40+ (81.8%).

Hopefully this massive drop in births can be explained by a data lag or maybe because there was a post-lockdown bounce in 2021, so numbers dropped back down in 2022. However, if this was due to a data lag you would expect the drop to be consistent in the different categories highlighted above.

Perhaps the drop is due to the ‘cost of living crisis’ – but then would you not expect the drop in numbers to be in poorer or younger women? Maybe it shows how the middle class are being hit the hardest?

But the effects of vaccination should not be dismissed and if I had the raw data I would want to look at this closer. The beginning of the drop coinciding with the peak in first vaccinations is worrying, as is the chart showing that the more wealthy and more vaccinated women are having fewer babies.
 
The more time passes (just wait), the more we realize what a slithering viper Fauci was. Commission a "study" (pay for it, direct it to be done) then refer to it as "evidence" of theory you want the world to subscribe to. Like the DOJ investigating the DOJ.

New emails show Dr. Anthony Fauci commissioned scientific paper in Feb. 2020 to disprove Wuhan lab leak theory​


New emails uncovered by House Republicans probing the COVID-19 pandemic reveal the deceptive nature of Dr. Anthony Fauci.

They show he “prompted” or commissioned — and had final approval on — a scientific paper written specifically in February 2020 to disprove the theory that the virus leaked from a lab in Wuhan, China.

Eight weeks later, Fauci stood at a White House press conference alongside President Donald Trump and cited that paper as evidence that the lab leak theory was implausible while pretending it had nothing to do with him and he did not know the authors.

“There was a study recently,” he told reporters on April 17, 2020, when asked if the virus could have come from a Chinese lab, “where a group of highly qualified evolutionary virologists looked at the sequences … in bats as they evolve and the mutations that it took to get to the point where it is now is totally consistent with a jump of a species from an animal to a human.

“So, the paper will be available. I don’t have the authors right now, but we can make it available to you.”



That paper, titled “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2,” was sent to Fauci for editing in draft form and again for final approval before it was published in Nature Medicine on Feb. 17, 2020.

It was written four days after Fauci, and his NIH boss Dr. Francis Collins, held a call with the four authors to discuss reports that COVID-19 may have leaked from the Wuhan lab and “may have been intentionally genetically manipulated.”

The House Oversight subcommittee published emails Sunday in which the paper’s co-author Dr. Kristian Andersen admits Fauci “prompted” him to write the paper with the goal to “disprove” the lab leak theory.

On Feb. 12, 2020, Andersen submitted the paper to Nature Medicine with a cover email: “There has been a lot of speculation, fear-mongering, and conspiracies put forward in this space. [This paper was] Prompted by Jeremy Farrah [sic], Tony Fauci, and Francis Collins.”

Farrar, then head of British nonprofit the Wellcome Trust, which has historic ties to the pharmaceutical industry and the Gates Foundation, was rewarded with the plum role of chief scientist at the World Health Organization last December.

On the day the “Proximal Origin” paper was published, emails show Farrar pushing through a crucial change: “Sorry to micromanage/micro edit! But would you be willing to change one sentence?”

Farrar’s change was to replace the word “unlikely” with “improbable” in a statement about the lab leak origin, so it would read: “It is improbable that SARS-CoV-2 emerged through laboratory manipulation of an existing SARS-related coronavirus.”

Improbable means having a probability too low to inspire belief; unbelievable, even ridiculous.

That’s what Fauci and friends wanted us to think of the lab leak theory that looked probable from the get-go, as one dissenting scientist said at the time, and looks more probable by the day.

The question of why Fauci went to such an effort to obscure the origins of COVID-19 is a major focus of the GOP-led committee.

While they’re at it, they should quiz the Biden administration’s new “US negotiator for the pandemic accord” at the WHO, Ambassador Pamela Hamamoto, a former campaign bundler and Hawaii schoolmate of Barack Obama.

Last month she sided with China to keep deliberations around this new international pandemic treaty secret.

What are they trying to hide?
 
Wow

Project Fear: COVID hysteria was engineered​


“When do we deploy the new variant?”

So much meaning is wrapped up in those 7 words, written in a WhatsApp message by Matt Hancock, who at the time was the Health Minister in the United Kingdom.



“When do we deploy the new variant?” By this, I assume they do not mean actually releasing a new strain of the virus into the wild, an act which I hope is beyond even the most depraved politician or bureaucrat to contemplate.


Rather, they are talking about how to “frighten the pants of [sic] everyone with the new strain.”


Clearly, the new strain itself was not what worried them–they after all are contemplating the timing of when to “deploy” it for maximum fear value–but rather the public’s waning fear of COVID. When, they are wondering, would it be strategically in their best interest to ramp up the fear value for maximum political benefit?


Saving lives wasn’t the point: enforcing compliance with diktats was.


COVID the virus may not have been deployed by any government, but COVID the “emergency” was clearly deployed as a massive plot to strip people of their freedoms and manipulate the public into compliance with absurd demands.


A vast trove of WhatsApp messages was leaked to the British press, and The Telegraph is combing through the 100,000 messages that were never meant to see the light of day. If you think they will confirm some of your worst fears about how the public has been manipulated over the past several years, you are dead right.

Matt Hancock wanted to “deploy” a new Covid variant to “frighten the pants off” the public and ensure they complied with lockdown, leaked messages seen by The Telegraph have revealed.
The Lockdown Files – more than 100,000 WhatsApp messages sent between ministers, officials and others – show how the Government used scare tactics to force compliance and push through lockdowns.
In another message Simon Case, the Cabinet Secretary, said that “the fear/ guilt factor” was “vital” in “ramping up the messaging” during the third national lockdown in Jan 2021.
The previous month, Matt Hancock, the then health secretary, appeared to suggest in one message that a new strain of Covid that had recently emerged would be helpful in preparing the ground for the looming lockdown, by scaring people into compliance.
In a WhatsApp conversation on Dec 13, obtained by The Telegraph, Damon Poole – one of Mr Hancock’s media advisers – informed his boss that Tory MPs were “furious already about the prospect” of stricter Covid measures and suggested “we can roll pitch with the new strain”.
The comment suggested that they believed the strain could be helpful in preparing the ground for a future lockdown and tougher restrictions in the run-up to Christmas 2020.
Mr Hancock then replied: “We frighten the pants off everyone with the new strain.”
Mr Poole agreed, saying: “Yep that’s what will get proper bahviour [sic] change.”
The consequences that stem from the lie have been dire. Millions of parents figured out long ago that they have been lied to and now won’t even get their children vaccinated from preventable diseases; trust in expert advice has plummeted for very good reasons; social tensions have skyrocketed, as millions who were right about everything were demonized by the government and their peers, mental health challenges have skyrocketed among children; lives and livelihoods were destroyed…the list is endless.

For what purpose? The costs have been astronomical and will continue for decades, and none of the measures taken stopped COVID because they didn’t have the means to do so.

The purpose was clearly not the public good, since the costs to the public have been devastating. But there was a massive transfer of wealth and power from the middle class to the wealthy and, in the United States, a transfer of power from the Right to the Left that likely would never have happened without COVID.

Could that be the purpose? Yes. Yes it was. COVID was a political and economic weapon.
 
Wow

Project Fear: COVID hysteria was engineered​


“When do we deploy the new variant?”

So much meaning is wrapped up in those 7 words, written in a WhatsApp message by Matt Hancock, who at the time was the Health Minister in the United Kingdom.



“When do we deploy the new variant?” By this, I assume they do not mean actually releasing a new strain of the virus into the wild, an act which I hope is beyond even the most depraved politician or bureaucrat to contemplate.


Rather, they are talking about how to “frighten the pants of [sic] everyone with the new strain.”


Clearly, the new strain itself was not what worried them–they after all are contemplating the timing of when to “deploy” it for maximum fear value–but rather the public’s waning fear of COVID. When, they are wondering, would it be strategically in their best interest to ramp up the fear value for maximum political benefit?


Saving lives wasn’t the point: enforcing compliance with diktats was.


COVID the virus may not have been deployed by any government, but COVID the “emergency” was clearly deployed as a massive plot to strip people of their freedoms and manipulate the public into compliance with absurd demands.


A vast trove of WhatsApp messages was leaked to the British press, and The Telegraph is combing through the 100,000 messages that were never meant to see the light of day. If you think they will confirm some of your worst fears about how the public has been manipulated over the past several years, you are dead right.

Matt Hancock wanted to “deploy” a new Covid variant to “frighten the pants off” the public and ensure they complied with lockdown, leaked messages seen by The Telegraph have revealed.
The Lockdown Files – more than 100,000 WhatsApp messages sent between ministers, officials and others – show how the Government used scare tactics to force compliance and push through lockdowns.
In another message Simon Case, the Cabinet Secretary, said that “the fear/ guilt factor” was “vital” in “ramping up the messaging” during the third national lockdown in Jan 2021.
The previous month, Matt Hancock, the then health secretary, appeared to suggest in one message that a new strain of Covid that had recently emerged would be helpful in preparing the ground for the looming lockdown, by scaring people into compliance.
In a WhatsApp conversation on Dec 13, obtained by The Telegraph, Damon Poole – one of Mr Hancock’s media advisers – informed his boss that Tory MPs were “furious already about the prospect” of stricter Covid measures and suggested “we can roll pitch with the new strain”.
The comment suggested that they believed the strain could be helpful in preparing the ground for a future lockdown and tougher restrictions in the run-up to Christmas 2020.
Mr Hancock then replied: “We frighten the pants off everyone with the new strain.”
Mr Poole agreed, saying: “Yep that’s what will get proper bahviour [sic] change.”
The consequences that stem from the lie have been dire. Millions of parents figured out long ago that they have been lied to and now won’t even get their children vaccinated from preventable diseases; trust in expert advice has plummeted for very good reasons; social tensions have skyrocketed, as millions who were right about everything were demonized by the government and their peers, mental health challenges have skyrocketed among children; lives and livelihoods were destroyed…the list is endless.

For what purpose? The costs have been astronomical and will continue for decades, and none of the measures taken stopped COVID because they didn’t have the means to do so.

The purpose was clearly not the public good, since the costs to the public have been devastating. But there was a massive transfer of wealth and power from the middle class to the wealthy and, in the United States, a transfer of power from the Right to the Left that likely would never have happened without COVID.

Could that be the purpose? Yes. Yes it was. COVID was a political and economic weapon.

I wonder how many people got Covid and were so deathly afraid they would die, they whipped themselves up into a severe panic attack scenario and keeled over from a heart attack.

We also now have a large portion of society who now cannot interact normally after being locked away for so long and others still afraid to leave their homes without a friggin useless mask. Can't imagine how the hypochondriacs made it through the scamdemic.
 
Top