- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 14,365
- Reaction score
- 5,433
- Points
- 113
A lot less often…INFINITELY less stupid than the vaccinated hospitalized sheep do.
A lot less often…INFINITELY less stupid than the vaccinated hospitalized sheep do.
So the vaccines ARE preventative? Imagine that!
Idiot, it WAS false, it’s CURRENTLY absolutely true.Gee, Dr. Flogstain, too bad the entire universe cannot access a source of information - I'll call it the "interwebz" - to investigate such questions. If ONLY we all could do so I would no longer have to correct your repeated, endless litany of misstatements and moronic claims. For example, if we could search the fictional interwebz by asking, "Hey, does Federal law mandate health insurers cover the Vaxshotz?" We would learn, oh I don't know, something like this:
Answering Dipshit's Questions About Why Insurers Pay for Vaxshotz
So you claim the Vaxshotz cost insurers money, I show that is demonstrably false since until a few weeks ago, ALL vaxshotz were bought and paid for by the government and currently insurers pay for vaxshotz because they are required to do so under Federal law.
Time for you to declare yourself the winner of the debate and go get your 5th booster and your manbun tightened.
Idiot, it WAS false, it’s CURRENTLY absolutely true.
They do so because covering a vaccine is a hell of a lot cheaper than covering a hospitalization.
Idiot, it WAS false, it’s CURRENTLY absolutely true.
They do so because covering a vaccine is a hell of a lot cheaper than covering a hospitalization.
It’s preventative medicine, meant to prevent illness and reduce medical expenditure. It’s not limited to the Covid vaccine. Health insurers incentivize providers to keep ER utilization and hospital admissions low to reduce their expenditure.Here, let me help. I know you are too stupid to remember what you claimed, what with the endless shifting of your narratives when exposed as a lying liar telling lies about ze's lies, so let me summarize:
So Dr. Flogstain, explain to us why Federal law would have to MANDATE insurance coverage for the vaxshotz if it was so darn wonderful for the medical insurers.*
- You claimed that health insurers would not cover the vaxshotz unless it was the bee's knees since it cost them money.
- I gave you a link showing that until September 13, 2023, ALL vaxshotz were paid for by the Federal government.
- You then said, "yEaH, WhUt AbOuT NoW? hUh??"
- I gave a link showing that Federal law mandates that insurers cover the vaxshotz.
* Let me explain what is obvious to those with at least average intelligence. Legislation is not needed to mandate what we do voluntarily. We have laws against giving poison to others, but no laws against consuming poison ourselves. Get it? Yeah, probably not. Have a 2nd grader explain it to you.
It’s preventative medicine, meant to prevent illness and reduce medical expenditure. It’s not limited to the Covid vaccine. Health insurers incentivize providers to keep ER utilization and hospital admissions low to reduce their expenditure.
There's always a first.....FlogWaffle!!! Bam!!
Meanwhile, Elvira has a question for FlogWaffle.
Nowhere near as stupid as you come across.Uh, I think that’s Morticia.
How stupid do the unvaccinated feel when they get hospitalized with Covid?
Please list where I said doctors are getting kickbacks from pharmaceutical companies, because I didn't, although it wouldn't surprise me if it still happens, time was, it was blatant.No, if you’re following along Zona suggested doctors are motivated by kickbacks from pharmaceutical companies.
Fact check? more like reality check… like I just gave you. Real life facts and figures:Nowhere near as stupid as you come across.
And how did I know you would fact check him on a fictional character, but never on any of the real life facts and figures he's presented in this thread?
I must be mystical.
I'm sorry.Fact check? more like reality check… like I just gave you. Real life facts and figures:
It turns out that they are doing both. Has ANYONE not gotten the virus that also got the shot?Idiot, it WAS false, it’s CURRENTLY absolutely true.
They do so because covering a vaccine is a hell of a lot cheaper than covering a hospitalization.
Yes, of course, laws are passed by a noble collection of altruistic philosophers whose only goal is the betterment of society. Money plays no role in legislation, at all, no siree. It's not like billions of dollars can be made by having legislation mandate or bar behavior, or that those who stand to make the billions contribute millions of dollars to the noble heroes in elected office to write legislation to make the donors those billions.
Nope, not at all. That's why you don't see pharmaceutical companies donating millions upon millions of dollars to politicians. Never happens.
Huh. Maybe that is not accurate. I wish somebody had pointed out a bit ago that the answer to almost every question is "money."
FFS, yes it’s what I “hang my hat on” and this:I'm sorry.
You've now posted this twice, beating your chest over FACTS it shows.
Are we to swoon over this 28 DAY sample period, for just the state of Washington, which does not contain bivalent nor monovalent booster doses, and contains the disclaimer :
Due to a small number of COVID-19 deaths, death rates in certain age groups may be unstable. Resulting rate ratios should be interpreted with caution.
THIS?!?!
This what you hang your hat on for a WORLDWIDE "killer" that's been around for almost three years, and these shots have been around for almost two years.
The state of Washington's most recent 28 day trend?
GTFOH!
Thanks for the midday laugh.
Speaking of opinions, you still haven't produced list of all you personally feel should be boosted. Not sure why this should be a problem for you since have no problem asking for the names of primary providers of certain members here.
I'm sorry.
You've now posted this twice, beating your chest over FACTS it shows.
Are we to swoon over this 28 DAY sample period, for just the state of Washington, which does not contain bivalent nor monovalent booster doses, and contains the disclaimer :
Due to a small number of COVID-19 deaths, death rates in certain age groups may be unstable. Resulting rate ratios should be interpreted with caution.
THIS?!?!
This what you hang your hat on for a WORLDWIDE "killer" that's been around for almost three years, and these shots have been around for almost two years.
The state of Washington's most recent 28 day trend?
GTFOH!
Thanks for the midday laugh.
fedderone, ho-lee ****, I think your post is enough for Dr. Flogstain to declare victory.
In a lot of cases, they’ll be covering both.Idiot, it WAS false, it’s CURRENTLY absolutely true.
They do so because covering a vaccine is a hell of a lot cheaper than covering a hospitalization.
A lot less often…
I'm sorry.
You've now posted this twice, beating your chest over FACTS it shows.
Are we to swoon over this 28 DAY sample period, for just the state of Washington, which does not contain bivalent nor monovalent booster doses, and contains the disclaimer :
Due to a small number of COVID-19 deaths, death rates in certain age groups may be unstable. Resulting rate ratios should be interpreted with caution.
THIS?!?!
This what you hang your hat on for a WORLDWIDE "killer" that's been around for almost three years, and these shots have been around for almost two years.
The state of Washington's most recent 28 day trend?
GTFOH!
Thanks for the midday laugh.
In a day and age where 0.7 people die a day per state. More people drown in kiddie pools every day than from Covid.