- Joined
- Apr 21, 2014
- Messages
- 12,104
- Reaction score
- 16,078
- Points
- 113
To repeat. How is challenging something in court unconstitutional?
Election Day 2020
- Thread starter madinsomniac
- Start date
LOL - no.
LOL - they did nothing to incite resistance
LOL - the Squawk did
LOL - Nancy Pefuckinglosi did
LOL @ you
Don't even take the troll's bait, and he'll slink away again eventually.
Statue = Michael "American Patriot" Avenatti, Christine Blasey Ford, Mary L. Trump, XiNN, The Bidens, Corrupt Empty Suits, Globalist Cucks etc.
Dog = Tibs
Statue = Michael "American Patriot" Avenatti, Christine Blasey Ford, Mary L. Trump, XiNN, The Bidens, Corrupt Empty Suits, Globalist Cucks etc.
Dog = Tibs
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 20,739
- Reaction score
- 22,730
- Points
- 113
Man of the year!
[/url] 
[/IMG]
[/IMG]
This is the "decent man" and "decent family" that was illegally thrust into the White House. A con artist, a swindler, a racist, a rapist.
--------------------------
"I personally think this China problem is deeper and vaster than most of us care to admit. In fact, it may be too far gone. We are just seeing glimpses of it.
China makes a very tempting appeal to the political, business and cultural class. Risk-less never-ending wealth for those who comply and comport with the CCP. Thats the essence of the faustian promise of all of Bidens business dealings. The promise of millions of return, without seemingly any sweat or investment equity on their part. Meanwhile they try to temper and rationalize China as part of the "global community" without sinister motive and not for what they are, our singular, greatest threat. Or they try to give it the appearance of a legitimate, genuine business dealings.
It's nothing of the sort. It's just as everything is within a Communist system of finance - funny money, all for appearances, backed by nothing. All they want in return are our secrets and our political souls. Our business, technological and military secrets will serve as a great equalizer so they can temper the military threat. Specifically never condemn them, ever, for anything. That's the only way you can justify, rationalize a political class who continually suggests America is racist, oppressive while taking money from the most racist, xenophobic force on the world. Capitalism was turned in on itself by our love of money, without regard to the color of the money. All those leftist, democrat, socialists who supposedly abhor the idea of free markets actually lust for money and wealth for themselves and love speaking of the injustices of it for everyone else. The Chinese Communists know it and have exploited it to their advantage.
More so, sadly, if the truth were to completely expose the Bidens, it wouldn't change any minds.
I'm not sure how a serious, sober minded person reads this Wall Street Journal article and doesn't come to the various and obvious conclusions about the depth of their corruption, their subsequently compromised state, and the astonishing contrast in reporting between Russian collusion and real Chinese collusion that seems to be an epidemic amongst Dems.
The Chinese are seemingly everywhere throughout our society. In our universities, stealing academic ideas. In our defense industrial base taking sensitive secrets. In silicon valley taking IP. Tempting Wall Street firms with the promise of billions.
Sadly, as I explained to my son last night, they are a serious nation, with serious leadership that is serious about their end game. We in comparison are arguing about inconsequential seemingly petty things in comparison. We lack a necessary equal, opposite and corresponding deep and abiding sense of national pride to oppose them anymore. It's by design.
Once upon a time, not too long ago, serious people, of a serious nation, of serious political parties and a serious media would have been unified in their interest in this story and the potential consequences. Not anymore.
As the President rightfully says at the conclusion of this article: "When your humble correspondent and Maria Bartiromo were interviewing the president last summer for a book, Mr. Trump mentioned that he used to wonder why his Beltway adversaries always use Russia when advancing conspiracy theories about him. He chuckled as he recounted the moment he understood why and said, “They never use China. You know why? ’Cause they’re all getting rich on China.”
Cause they are all getting rich from China. That explains it all.”"
--------------------------
The Bidens and Beijing
Tax questions about Hunter’s income raise again the question of how he earned it.
Hunter Biden may have wanted to hold 10% for the “big guy,” but did he forget to set aside 37% for Uncle Sam? A tax investigation focused on the Biden family’s highly questionable sources of income may finally force them to answer precisely how such income is generated in the first place.
The Journal’s Ken Thomas and Sabrina Siddiqui report:
Exactly one year ago, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.) and six Democrats chairing House committees unveiled their plan to charge President Donald Trump with impeachment articles which did not claim he had committed any crimes. Mr. Trump’s alleged offense was suggesting that a foreign government look into Hunter Biden dealings which any reasonable person would say deserved examination. A source now tells the Journal that the feds began investigating Biden taxes in 2018. One year ago today, did any of the congressional Democrats know that as they were accusing Mr. Trump of non-crimes, the subject of his scrutiny was already under U.S. criminal investigation?..............[more inside the link]
--------------------------
"I personally think this China problem is deeper and vaster than most of us care to admit. In fact, it may be too far gone. We are just seeing glimpses of it.
China makes a very tempting appeal to the political, business and cultural class. Risk-less never-ending wealth for those who comply and comport with the CCP. Thats the essence of the faustian promise of all of Bidens business dealings. The promise of millions of return, without seemingly any sweat or investment equity on their part. Meanwhile they try to temper and rationalize China as part of the "global community" without sinister motive and not for what they are, our singular, greatest threat. Or they try to give it the appearance of a legitimate, genuine business dealings.
It's nothing of the sort. It's just as everything is within a Communist system of finance - funny money, all for appearances, backed by nothing. All they want in return are our secrets and our political souls. Our business, technological and military secrets will serve as a great equalizer so they can temper the military threat. Specifically never condemn them, ever, for anything. That's the only way you can justify, rationalize a political class who continually suggests America is racist, oppressive while taking money from the most racist, xenophobic force on the world. Capitalism was turned in on itself by our love of money, without regard to the color of the money. All those leftist, democrat, socialists who supposedly abhor the idea of free markets actually lust for money and wealth for themselves and love speaking of the injustices of it for everyone else. The Chinese Communists know it and have exploited it to their advantage.
More so, sadly, if the truth were to completely expose the Bidens, it wouldn't change any minds.
I'm not sure how a serious, sober minded person reads this Wall Street Journal article and doesn't come to the various and obvious conclusions about the depth of their corruption, their subsequently compromised state, and the astonishing contrast in reporting between Russian collusion and real Chinese collusion that seems to be an epidemic amongst Dems.
The Chinese are seemingly everywhere throughout our society. In our universities, stealing academic ideas. In our defense industrial base taking sensitive secrets. In silicon valley taking IP. Tempting Wall Street firms with the promise of billions.
Sadly, as I explained to my son last night, they are a serious nation, with serious leadership that is serious about their end game. We in comparison are arguing about inconsequential seemingly petty things in comparison. We lack a necessary equal, opposite and corresponding deep and abiding sense of national pride to oppose them anymore. It's by design.
Once upon a time, not too long ago, serious people, of a serious nation, of serious political parties and a serious media would have been unified in their interest in this story and the potential consequences. Not anymore.
As the President rightfully says at the conclusion of this article: "When your humble correspondent and Maria Bartiromo were interviewing the president last summer for a book, Mr. Trump mentioned that he used to wonder why his Beltway adversaries always use Russia when advancing conspiracy theories about him. He chuckled as he recounted the moment he understood why and said, “They never use China. You know why? ’Cause they’re all getting rich on China.”
Cause they are all getting rich from China. That explains it all.”"
--------------------------
The Bidens and Beijing
Tax questions about Hunter’s income raise again the question of how he earned it.
Hunter Biden may have wanted to hold 10% for the “big guy,” but did he forget to set aside 37% for Uncle Sam? A tax investigation focused on the Biden family’s highly questionable sources of income may finally force them to answer precisely how such income is generated in the first place.
The Journal’s Ken Thomas and Sabrina Siddiqui report:
Exactly one year ago, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.) and six Democrats chairing House committees unveiled their plan to charge President Donald Trump with impeachment articles which did not claim he had committed any crimes. Mr. Trump’s alleged offense was suggesting that a foreign government look into Hunter Biden dealings which any reasonable person would say deserved examination. A source now tells the Journal that the feds began investigating Biden taxes in 2018. One year ago today, did any of the congressional Democrats know that as they were accusing Mr. Trump of non-crimes, the subject of his scrutiny was already under U.S. criminal investigation?..............[more inside the link]
Last edited:
Oh, the irony.
No irony at all. Texas is stepping up to save the people of those states from their corrupt courts, to protect the integrity of their vote, and to protect the integrity of our Elections systems.
In fact, given Texas's bold and heroic moves, it should read:
Don't Tread On US
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2014
- Messages
- 11,011
- Reaction score
- 13,118
- Points
- 113
Tibs, if you can't see the painful irony in you posting this definition... you can't be helped. You literally just defined the actions of the democratic party for the last 4 years. Honestly you could NOT have been clearer.
From Tibsters Dictionary? That bit of cherry picking certainly didn't come from Websters.
An illegal action inciting resistance to lawful authority and tending to cause the disruption or overthrow of the government.
There's nothing to suggest an illegal action to overthrow the government, and if anyone is guilty of inciting it's you ********.
in·cite
•urge or persuade (someone) to act in a violent or unlawful way.
Tibs...I noticed your ramping up your rhetoric lately...not like you man..
Your POV politically is well known and you usually articulate it well and the "right" way, whether people agree with it or not......but lately your posts have become more :edgy" so to say..
You ok man?
Your POV politically is well known and you usually articulate it well and the "right" way, whether people agree with it or not......but lately your posts have become more :edgy" so to say..
You ok man?
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2014
- Messages
- 12,104
- Reaction score
- 16,078
- Points
- 113
I think Dems are worried these lawsuits will actually start winning once they get past liberal lower level courts. It’s actually pretty cut and dry the PA violated the constitution. There is no possible argument against it. That’s why there is so much energy put into silencing and ridicule.
This^^^^
This entire charade shows us exactly where we are and how split we are.
What the PA Supreme Court did was clearly and without argument a direct violation of the United States Constitution and is illegal.
Legislatures (i.e., state Supreme Courts) "enforce" the laws. They do not and cannot "create" laws.
Only the State Legislatures have the Constitutional mandate and charter to "create" laws.
What the PA Supreme Court and others did was "create" law. They cannot. Period. There is no interpretation on this. They cannot create law. It's the law of the land. ANY argument against this premise is a failed argument.
Yet...the Left says "we don't care." They are willing to allow this breaking of the law to achieve a goal. It doesn't matter to them that law was violated in order to achieve the goal. The ends justify the means. THAT is the problem.
And that is what scares the ever living **** out of so many and why these lawsuits matter. This can never, ever happen again or lets just rip up the Constitution and realize that we are in a completely new world where those in power will Govern by bypassing the laws that have ruled this land for 244 years. They will rule by dictate and decree and laws don't matter.
That is end game for this one great nation.
Thus, these lawsuits are critical. Frankly, at this point, I care less about who is put into office. I care immensely that the states are put into check, reprimanded, and held to the law so that this never happens again.
SCOTUS needs to rule on this.
Many lefties start out civil and articulate in expressing their viewpoints, but the more you can demonstrate how they are wrong, the more they resist...many reaching the point of "going full libtard". Tibs has reached "full libtard" no doubt.
Hypocrisy and double standards, projection, denial, accusations, and flat out lies in their "debate" arsenal.
Each of those can be found throughout Tibs posts.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 8,111
- Reaction score
- 7,841
- Points
- 113
The cover:
And the alternative cover:
You guys should print these out and tape them up somewhere near your desks, as there seems to be a lot of confusion around here regarding the outcome of this election. Just trying to help.
All 35 Time Magazine subscribers will be sure to do that.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 8,111
- Reaction score
- 7,841
- Points
- 113
[/url]
Don't forget "I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy," Biden said. "I mean, that's a storybook, man."
I'm sure all 35 hated when he got it in 2016, calling him President of the Divided States of America, a legacy he inherited from Bammy. And a telling statement on calls for Unity and how the media does not, never has, never will call for Unity when a Conservative takes the White House. They divide from day 1.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 9,203
- Reaction score
- 12,026
- Points
- 113
Tibs has repeatedly been vile, in this and other threads. His return to posting is a continuation of his path, not unlike before.
As he became uncivil, well before the 2016 election, many here initially took his daily, vehement anti-Trumpisms in stride. He literally defined the libtard glide path into TDS then full on derangement for this political forum. Then his handlers pulled him away. Now he is back.
Many on this site are disrespectful to him because he was disrespectful to many, many contributors. He sometimes apologizes after the fact, but few here believe him to be honorable.
One long time SN contributor labeled Tibs a paid leftist troll many years ago.....and I, like you, attempted to suggest that Tibs was better than that. I do not know that he is actually paid, but I do now know that he has become vile to many contributors. I was wrong to attempt to defend Tibs as a good person; you may one day come to a similar conclusion.
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
Last edited:
I'm sure all 35 hated when he got it in 2016, calling him President of the Divided States of America, a legacy he inherited from Bammy. And a telling statement on calls for Unity and how the media does not, never has, never will call for Unity when a Conservative takes the White House. They divide from day 1.
About a year ago I was arguing with one of these Trump derangement guys...who kept telling me that Trump was just the worst person ever. I said you would say that about any Republican in there. He stated no way, Trump is just the worst, a degenerate and all that. A little bit later in the conversation I said fine, get rid of him and Pence can be President. Without missing a beat, he goes, "What!? Pence is worse, he's a religious nut!"
So after bloviating about how Trump was the worst, he, in the same damn conversation, called Pence worse. How can you be worse than the worst? The conversation ended when I called him out on it.
It just proves your point.
Nothing to see here. The Swamp is deep and alive.
AG Barr knew about Hunter Biden probe for months: report
The Wall Street Journal reports that Barr worked to stop details being disclosed to the public
Attorney General William Barr reportedly knew about investigations into Hunter Biden’s business and financial dealings for months and worked to stop them from being disclosed to the public during the election campaign.
The Wall Street Journal reported that Barr was aware of investigations involving President-elect Joe Biden’s son since before the spring and has resisted pressure from Republicans in Congress for information into the investigations...[more inside]
AG Barr knew about Hunter Biden probe for months: report
The Wall Street Journal reports that Barr worked to stop details being disclosed to the public
Attorney General William Barr reportedly knew about investigations into Hunter Biden’s business and financial dealings for months and worked to stop them from being disclosed to the public during the election campaign.
The Wall Street Journal reported that Barr was aware of investigations involving President-elect Joe Biden’s son since before the spring and has resisted pressure from Republicans in Congress for information into the investigations...[more inside]
[/url]
Not a damn peep by the media
This has to be fake news its from the Wall Street Journal
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,507
- Reaction score
- 6,229
- Points
- 113
So now what? Space court?
Supreme Court just summarily told Trump and the GOP to **** right off. I guess we still get to have a country, for a few more years at least.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 15,059
- Reaction score
- 13,414
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Lebanon, OH (Near Kings Island)
So now what? Space court?
Supreme Court just summarily told Trump and the GOP to **** right off. I guess we still get to have a country, for a few more years at least.
Nope we just lost it to fraud.
Similar threads
