- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
“Members of Parliament will debate a motion to condemn Islamophobia and track incidents of hate crimes against Muslims in the House of Commons next week.”
First the word “Islamophobia” is specifically mentioned twice in the motion. Anti-Semitism or homophobia or hatred against another specified group is never mentioned but is described, as the afterthought it is as “all forms of systemic racism and religious discrimination.” To a person of average intelligence, it is clear the purpose of this motion is to attack Islamophobia.
Had Khalid, the Muslim MP who sponsored the bill, been really concerned about “systemic racism and religious discrimination” she would not have included the word “Islamophobia” in M-103. It is clear the intent of the motion that has MPs from all political parties absolutely enthralled is to give a special status to Muslims and the religion of peace.
There is another part of the motion that is even more troubling than paying homage to the left’s (and this includes some members of the CPC) favourite group of victims. This has to do with what the motion requests the government should do.
The motion asks the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage (Canada does not have any heritage according to Trudeau so why do we have a heritage committee but I digress) to study, among other things, “to develop a whole-of-government approach to reducing or eliminating systemic racism and religious discrimination including Islamophobia in Canada…”
Since the government is in the business of making laws, this “whole-of-government approach” must be interpreted as including passing laws to make Islamophobia illegal or a crime. Of course the government has never defined exactly what Islamophobia is. And probably never will.
http://canadafreepress.com/article/free-speech-in-canada-the-beginning-of-the-end
First the word “Islamophobia” is specifically mentioned twice in the motion. Anti-Semitism or homophobia or hatred against another specified group is never mentioned but is described, as the afterthought it is as “all forms of systemic racism and religious discrimination.” To a person of average intelligence, it is clear the purpose of this motion is to attack Islamophobia.
Had Khalid, the Muslim MP who sponsored the bill, been really concerned about “systemic racism and religious discrimination” she would not have included the word “Islamophobia” in M-103. It is clear the intent of the motion that has MPs from all political parties absolutely enthralled is to give a special status to Muslims and the religion of peace.
There is another part of the motion that is even more troubling than paying homage to the left’s (and this includes some members of the CPC) favourite group of victims. This has to do with what the motion requests the government should do.
The motion asks the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage (Canada does not have any heritage according to Trudeau so why do we have a heritage committee but I digress) to study, among other things, “to develop a whole-of-government approach to reducing or eliminating systemic racism and religious discrimination including Islamophobia in Canada…”
Since the government is in the business of making laws, this “whole-of-government approach” must be interpreted as including passing laws to make Islamophobia illegal or a crime. Of course the government has never defined exactly what Islamophobia is. And probably never will.
http://canadafreepress.com/article/free-speech-in-canada-the-beginning-of-the-end
