no, but @Steeltime has $50 laying aroundANY chance of you staking me $50.00 until payday ???
Salute the nation
no, but @Steeltime has $50 laying aroundANY chance of you staking me $50.00 until payday ???
Salute the nation
So is this a one year thing?
Speculatively speaking here....if Wilson or Fields ball out this season do we extend them? I would think so. If we simply finish say like we have over the past 10 seasons do we extend one? If Wilson starts all season and we have a so so season do we pick up Fields option? I see that as an option speculatively speaking.
no, but @Steeltime has $50 laying around
no, but @Steeltime has $50 laying around
We have to buy proven talent. Tomlin doesn't coach up.
Thread done. Supe beat me to it...all valid points regarding ownership and the FO
and do not discount the negativity flowing on social media. i'd think that the Steelers see/hear the fans complaints and concerns just as well as other teams. Addressing those and making bold moves shows we're not going to be complacent and not going to be some middle of the pack team for lack of trying.
remember all the chants to "Fire Canada" that went on in Pittsburgh - and not just at Steelers games? those have to carry a weight with management and ownership.
i mean, this IS an entertainment industry. give the people what they want.
So speculatively speaking of course......that is very doubtful...or so I would think.I believe if I remember correctly that we have to make that decision this May.
No, it's pretty different. The old Steelers didn't operate this way too often.I dont really see as much change as people perceive, I think all of these movesxare mostly what we have done in the past.
we have sold low on wrs who were damaged and disgruntled players for a while now... we just normally didnt have multiple cases in a year.
Examples of disgruntled or damaged wrs traded low on include Santonio, AB, Claypool, Bryant, and Coates.
Examples of traded "hostages" include melvin Ingram, a couple of those wr and we released a bunch more in season like Harrison and that safety from green bay...
Trading low for draft picks from other teams they loved or getting them as cheap free agents is another long term thing they have done...
Look at WJ3, Gilbert, or signings like Alualu
I think Queen is the biggest deviation, but its not like they dont have precedent for this kind of move and they contract he signed was like 5 million per year less than his perceived market value... its not like they went overboard
The fact is the Steelers have made lots of moves like these in the recent past, just rarely so close together
Kind of reminds me of Dan Synder in the early 2000s when he brought in an older Deion Sanders to the Redskins and over paid him like 50+million and got a bunch of other star players, yet didn't make the playoffs. What was lacking was the coaching.They can buy all the(mercenaries)people they want because it won't matter without proper scheming on Offense/Defense week in and out.
Kind of reminds me of Dan Synder in the early 2000s when he brought in an older Deion Sanders to the Redskins and over paid him like 50+million and got a bunch of other star players, yet didn't make the playoffs. What was lacking was the coaching.
Not mine at all. I'm not seeing that 40 million dollar contract on a free agent. Look at how many players Khan has brought into the facility and they walked out of it with no deal. The Jets just signed Mike Evans to a ridiculous contract and the Jets will continue to be the Jets. The Browns just over paid Juedy IMO considering they over paid Watson. I'm not seeing a gross negligence of spending, I'm seeing a thrifty spender thus far and great market value for the players he is signing.Bingo! That's honestly my top concern.
Not mine at all. I'm not seeing that 40 million dollar contract on a free agent. Look at how many players Khan has brought into the facility and they walked out of it with no deal. The Jets just signed Mike Evans to a ridiculous contract and the Jets will continue to be the Jets. The Browns just over paid Juedy IMO considering they over paid Watson. I'm not seeing a gross negligence of spending, I'm seeing a thrifty spender thus far and great market value for the players he is signing.
Oh they're great with numbers.They always have been. Even more so with the new GM.It will look great on paper..They have done everything possible to set things up for success.
The draft is the only thing left on the table.
Now it will fall upon the HC,OC and DC to make it work. Which was my point.
The truth is, we don't have any idea whatsoever how it will go. I can only go by history and paper doesn't make champions.
That might be the understatement of the century!considering they over paid Watson.
You're ignoring a huge component of this situation: The Steelers of yesteryear would not even be entertaining these moves. Why has this team all-of-a-sudden became open to moves like these? You mean one hissy fit by one entitled player has completely reversed the Steelers decade-old strategies when it come to free agency? That's your total explanation? I don't see it; something else has transpired here. The Queen signing alone is so un-Steeler like.Russ Wilson wanted to play for Pittsburgh without a multi-year contract. That's what changed.
The consequences were Pickett turning to a whining ***** that didnt want to compete, trading him to the eagles closed that door for the bears shopping Fields and creating a vacuum of trading partners that lowered Fields cost so we could trade for him, with the help from Fields who sees Pittsburgh as an opportunity to relaunch his career after Wilson's 1 year contract.
Also had problems and into today.Was rhe board down for everyone yesterday or just me?
That's not the only reason but was the trigger that helped it. Obviously Kahn isn't resting in his laurels as he hasn't won anything as a GM and wants to fix the existing issues , but I'm a 100% sure that if Wilson didn't come for free there was no way to afford him. His signing was what caused KP to run away, leaving a burning hole at the QB room, which was masterfully filled with the cheap Fields trade. Better natural talent than KP but more complicated contract situation next yearYou're ignoring a huge component of this situation: The Steelers of yesteryear would not even be entertaining these moves. Why has this team all-of-a-sudden became open to moves like these? You mean one hissy fit by one entitled player has completely reversed the Steelers decade-old strategies when it come to free agency? That's your total explanation? I don't see it; something else has transpired here. The Queen signing alone is so un-Steeler like.
It was down for awhile for me as well.Was rhe board down for everyone yesterday or just me?