Yes I've read a lot of claims and I've read a lot of debunking of claims and I've seen no real proof of anything. I won't bother to post links because unless they come from Newsmax or some other rightwing source you guys will just discredit them.
Nobody has "debunked" D'Souza's data; instead, opponents argue that people can be in the same small area 10x or more just because an ice cream stand is nearby or something.
I previously debunked the claimed debunking. Cell phone tracking now pins the phone to a location within 8' of where the person was located. Nothing is within 8' of the voting collection boxes - nothing. The damn things are like mailboxes.
"So what?", you ask. Okay, sure. But the same people - 2000 cell phones - who made at least 10 visits to ballot collection boxes also paid at least 5 visits to "non-profits" that are famous for collecting votes. Exactly how many non-paid operatives went to ballot boxes ten times? And coincidentally also paid at least 5 visits to the (D)imbo-supporting "non-profits"?
Here is the flaccid argument against D'Souza's argument, courtesy of the left-wing shitbox known as Wikipedia:
2000 Mules is a 2022 American
political film by political commentator
Dinesh D'Souza that falsely
[4] claims unnamed nonprofit organizations paid
Democrat-aligned "
mules" to illegally collect and deposit ballots into drop boxes in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin during the
2020 presidential election. D'Souza has a history of creating and spreading
conspiracy theories.
[5]
The
Associated Press (AP) reported that the film relies on "faulty assumptions, anonymous accounts and improper analysis of cellphone location data" provided by
True the Vote, a
conservative vote-monitoring organization.
[6] FactCheck.org found the film's "supposed evidence is speculative."
[7] National Public Radio (NPR) reported True the Vote "made multiple misleading or false claims about its [own] work".
[8] AP reported that the film's assertion that True the Vote identified 1,155 paid mules in Philadelphia alone was false. The film presented a single unverified anonymous witness who said she saw people picking up what she "assumed" were payments for ballot collection in Arizona; no evidence of payments was presented in any of the other four states.
[6] The film characterizes the alleged operation as "ballot trafficking" with "stash houses", but presents no evidence that ballots were illegally collected to be deposited in drop boxes.
[6][9][10][11]
First, the comment "D'Souza has a history of spreading conspiracy theories" is an ad hominem attack. It does not bother to deal with the facts asserted. Strike 1.
The AP claim is an argument based on the assumption that the documentary is faulty, a logical flaw known as begging the question. "You can't believe the film because it's flawed." "Well, why is it flawed?" "Because it's flawed." Strike 2.
"Supposed evidence is speculative." No, the evidence is exactly what it is - cell phone GPS tracking data. There is nothing speculative about that. The data show thousands of people paying at least 10 visits to ballot boxes (how many did you make, OFTB?) and at least 5 visits to vote-harvesting "non-profits." Not one fact is speculative. Know what's speculative? The biased dismissals of this evidence. Strike 3.
True the Vote has made "misleading claims." Another ad hominem attack. Strike 4.
The finding of 1,155 mules in Philadelphia alone is false because it's false. Begging the question yet again. Strike 5.
No evidence the ballots were illegally collected. Ten visits to drop boxes? How ******* many invalid relatives do these people have?? TEN VISITS TO THE DROP BOXES?? Seriously? "No evidence the votes were gathered illegally," when in fact EVERY state cited has laws against ballot harvesting. Strike 6.
What a joke. Video shows poll worker in Fulton County pulling hundreds of ballots from a suitcase stashed under a table and not brought out until the poll watchers sent home and the polling station closed? "Oh, we can explain that. Those are ballot bins, not suitcases, and magic reindeer pull a sleigh, and a fairy gives you two bits for your tooth and ..."
Bullshit. And you are shocked - SHOCKED! - that the criminals engaged in the crime may not be telling the truth when they come up with some bullshit excuse for what they did.
