• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

N.H. won't ban women from showing breasts or nipples in public

Spike

Regular Member
Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2014
Messages
24,914
Reaction score
11,537
Points
113
CONCORD, N.H. -- The New Hampshire House on Wednesday rejected a bill that would have made it crime for women to expose their breasts or nipples in public, a measure that caused an online dispute among several legislators that drew national attention.

The House voted against making it a misdemeanor for women to show their breasts with "reckless disregard" for whether it would offend someone. The bill was partly a response to a "Free the Nipple" movement that led to two women being cited for going topless at a Gilford beach.

Bill supporters had cautioned that allowing women to go topless at beaches could lead to them also going topless at libraries and Little League games.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/new-hampshire-wont-ban-women-from-showing-breasts-nipples-public/

---------------------

Just in time for Spring Break?

beachparty1.jpg
 
Last edited:
With the internet kids can see breasts whenever they want. Time for America to grow up and quit being so prudish.
 
Hear, hear....
 
This would be great if it wasn't for the RadFem SJWs who will soon after be pressing for legislation to charge any man looking at said nipples with a sex offense. Remember the movie Zach and Mirri make a Porno? "There's no such thing as free titties."
 
DBS always gotta piss on a birthday cake
 
We have snowbacks around all the time now.
 
I like the idea of "freeing the nipple." Now, New Hampshire residents can just look out the window to see if it's cold.
 
It's kind if hypocritical to criticize Muslims for making their women wear beekeeper suits and have our own laws that prohibit nudity.
 
It's time we bring the country out of the Stone Age on matters of sexuality and nudity... the religious whack jobs be damned. Take TV for instance.. we can show a zombie eating someone's face off but can't show a titty or two people having sex. Sex is a completely natural act in which human beings engage, but it's treated like its something bad or wrong. This has to end in order to progress as a species... time throw the old puritanical ways of thinking onto the ash heap of history.
 
I vote the next SteelerNation draft party (or any parties) be held in NH from here forward. All in favor?
 
It's time we bring the country out of the Stone Age on matters of sexuality and nudity... the religious whack jobs be damned. Take TV for instance.. we can show a zombie eating someone's face off but can't show a titty or two people having sex. Sex is a completely natural act in which human beings engage, but it's treated like its something bad or wrong. This has to end in order to progress as a species... time throw the old puritanical ways of thinking onto the ash heap of history.

Two words.

Caligula. Rome.

Rampant sexuality has been tried before. It's brought down nations before.

Prior to you and your 'enlightened' liberal friends running around professing that we need to advance from the stone ages...the stone ages have tried this. With little success.

But hey, Socialism's been tried over and over again too. Gotta try that again too.

Liberals - never learning from history.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MTC
Two words.

Caligula. Rome.

Rampant sexuality has been tried before. It's brought down nations before.

Prior to you and your 'enlightened' liberal friends running around professing that we need to advance from the stone ages...the stone ages have tried this. With little success.

But hey, Socialism's been tried over and over again too. Gotta try that again too.

Liberals - never learning from history.

It is frustrating that the history of societies is not taught. Capitalism should not have to be defended as the most moral economic model, just as we should not have to remind anyone of the inevitable results of socialism. But alas, we are stuck with the products of government schools. What to do?
 
Two words.

Caligula. Rome.

Rampant sexuality has been tried before. It's brought down nations before.

Prior to you and your 'enlightened' liberal friends running around professing that we need to advance from the stone ages...the stone ages have tried this. With little success.

But hey, Socialism's been tried over and over again too. Gotta try that again too.

Liberals - never learning from history.

1852 called..
It said it misses you and wants you to come home.
 
I was referring to your world view which is very much yesterday. We are sexual creatures. It's how we reproduce. ******* and dicks are just parts of the human anatomy. I can't understand why people think the act of sex or the body parts it requires are vulgar and obscene. Personally I would rather my children be exposed to sexual activity on TV than the extreme violence that is so common we don't bat an eye when we see it.
 
Two words.

Caligula. Rome.

Rampant sexuality has been tried before. It's brought down nations before.

So the muzzies are on to something, or maybe just the FLDS? What's the right amount of allowable sex and nudity?
 
What's the right amount of allowable sex and nudity?

You tell me, what is the right amount and how do we measure it? By what units?

Before you go down your baiting path, I'm quite liberal about sex and nudity.

But I take exception to Roll's stupid comments however, that we need to advance out of the stone ages with our nation's views on sex. As mentioned it's been tried before. It's not new. The fact that a country may have a set of moral standards doesn't make said country undeveloped, uneducated or from the "stone age."

The moral fabric of this country has been one of its greatest strengths. Contrarily, the decay of moral fiber of society has been the downfall of many a nation prior. Rome being the best example.
 
I was referring to your world view which is very much yesterday.

What was the Romans' view? Forward thinking? Enlightened? Educated? Or destructive? Sex was a natural act to them as well. And it became common to take partners or share partners publicly in front of anyone. The decay of their moral fabric is one of the reasons the empire fell. You can find a thousand articles on it. I won't bother, because clearly you want to overlook this.

We are sexual creatures. It's how we reproduce. ******* and dicks are just parts of the human anatomy. I can't understand why people think the act of sex or the body parts it requires are vulgar and obscene.

I don't. I think they're beautiful works of art. But they are private. They are not public. Because I believe that the act should be shared between a man and a woman in private, not on the front lawn, doesn't mean I believe it is vulgar or obscene.

Personally I would rather my children be exposed to sexual activity on TV than the extreme violence

I don't even have time to address that this afternoon. How many bullet points would it take to cover AIDS/HIV, teen promiscuity, teenage pregnancy, rape, incest, sex and porn addictions, etc. and the ensuing debate over whether over or under exposure to sex on TV exacerbates or controls these issues. You see what Game of Thrones gets away with these days, and the on-air rape scenes. Can you imagine if we had an even more liberal view of sex how many and what type of rape scenes Hollywood would allow on TV? I cringe.

You want your kids to see that? Stay away from mine.
 
I'd **** Denise Milani on the front lawn of the goddamn White House and my spray of jizz on her bountiful bosom would be a work of art.
 
Nudity has it's place. LIttle league games and libraries is not the place. Yes, I'm a prude. Even when I was rocking a hot body I didn't want everyone to see it.
 
Top