I swear these twatwaffles would have rather lost today so they could get the Fire Tomlin wagon going full steam ahead instead of being 9 and 3
I swear these twatwaffles would have rather lost today so they could get the Fire Tomlin wagon going full steam ahead instead of being 9 and 3
Or they could've forced a pass in the end zone for an interception or taken a sack and missed out on a field goal.The dumb debauchery that could have costed him this game. Right before half time he had a time out but he blew using it costing us a chance at a TD. How difficult is using a TO instead of blowing it and wasting 8 seconds but there he stood, blowing it. That dumb blunder could have costed us the game. Tomlin is just not smart.
Well Iām not going to make a big deal about the non call of a TO there,but I surely will reply to this post. And Iāve already stated a few timesā¦.the coaches had a great game plan today. But it doesnāt mean you canāt disagree with the non call.8 seconds. Thatās a low percentage chance for endzone. Greater chance for a pick unless itās a throw away. Take the 3 points, start the second half with the ball. Lombardi, Shula, Walsh, Cowher, Reid - 101 Football in game management. You are a couch coach if you decide anything else.
I think weād be all strutting around with our chests out proud as could be at our teams achievement of no losing seasons if we had playoff success in the last 14 years.
Lloyd said:
The dumb debauchery that could have costed him this game. Right before half time he had a time out but he blew using it costing us a chance at a TD. How difficult is using a TO instead of blowing it and wasting 8 seconds but there he stood, blowing it. That dumb blunder could have costed us the game. Tomlin is just not smart.
Actually, costed is a word, just not correctly used here.if you are going to make this assertion you should really know that "costed" is not a word
******* idiot
Ohā¦.id say weāre definitely ready.So we've been here done that,memorized the script forward and backward. Just waiting to see if the ending is going to be rewritten.
costActually, costed is a word, just not correctly used here.
Spin it how ever you like, but it was a failure in clock management
Well Iām not going to make a big deal about the non call of a TO there,but I surely will reply to this post. And Iāve already stated a few timesā¦.the coaches had a great game plan today. But it doesnāt mean you canāt disagree with the non call.
This couch potato coach would have certainly called a TO there. And youāre trying to tell me Andy Reid with Pat Mahomesā¦Bill Cowher with Big Benā¦Bill Walsh with Joe Montanaā¦.Don Shula with Dan Marino ā¦.Vince Lombardi with Bart Starr would not have called a TO and given there QB a chance with a pass into the Endzone? There was enough time to spot someone open or throw it away and still make the FG. I think Andy Reid would have called a TO so fast that they might have added on a second. I certainly disagree with your very own couch potato coach assessment of that play.
Cheers.
Maybe. Maybe not.I think weād be all strutting around with our chests out proud as could be at our teams achievement of no losing seasons if we had playoff success in the last 14 years.
Itās called Sarcasm me boyIt's about time a thread was started dealing with Tomlin and his "no winning seasons".
This often-overlooked fact needed to be brought to everyone's attention.
Ok but having an obsession with Tomlin having no losing seasons evoked this so-called sarcasm.Itās called Sarcasm me boy
8 seconds. Thatās a low percentage chance for endzone. Greater chance for a pick unless itās a throw away. Take the 3 points, start the second half with the ball. Lombardi, Shula, Walsh, Cowher, Reid - 101 Football in game management. You are a couch coach if you decide anything else.
Before half was 100% on purpose and Iād be stunned if he said otherwise. He managed the time fine for what he wanted to achieve before the half.17 years as a head coach and he STILL hasn't learned clock management. There is something way wrong there, almost like he is doing it on purpose.
Or a winning season ā¦I have never had a losing season
I think weād be all strutting around with our chests out proud as could be at our teams achievement of no losing seasons if we had playoff success in the last 14 years.
Why comment on it? Because i thought your statement was absolute hogwash. And itās a football forum. Thatās why.If itās not a big deal, why comment on it? For the record, Russ, at this time, isnāt anything close to Montana, Marino, Mahomes or Ben. Coach Lombardi was the most conservative out of all of those coaches, you think heās gambling with a lead in that situation? You said it yourself āa chanceā. That chance with many low percentage if, if, ifās. Take the easy points, you are getting the ball after the half.
You are certainly right about the Cowher example. I guess itās just human nature,always wanting more.Maybe. Maybe not.
Cowher had a ton of playoff success while at the same time slammed for "never winning anything".... until he finally did before he retired.
I so clearly remember that playoff wins were not good enough for those calling for Cowhers head.
Grammar question...is saying "maybe not" necessary after saying "maybe"?
Because if you think about it, saying "maybe" already implies "maybe not".
A small technicalityOr a winning season ā¦
But to even have a chance to win in the playoffs, you have to have a winning season.^^^THIS^^^
Many here confuse the hatred for this exact thing. Itās not that many donāt want wins more than losses, but itās the Groundhog Day affect that is very bothersome.
Playoff wins have always been the standard with this franchise, post merger, and many here feel the standard has & is being lowered by this coaching regime.
This year will be different (not yesterdays high talking), this team has some juice in the tank. I just hope the Coaching sideās juice is plentiful enough to last a round or two +, in to the playoffs.
Salute the nation