First of all, you don't see me responding to a genuine, uninitiated poster with rude sarcasm. I can be a smarmy prick on here, but someone who says "I think Sanders was a really good wideout for us" or "Jarvis had a promising rookie year" doesn't get sarcasm or attitude from me at all. I may respond to the post with statistical data that shows Sanders performed below the level of most WR2s, or that Jarvis had no sack production as a rookie. But you do not see me "go after" someone who just presented an opinion.
On the other hand, someone who posts "Fukk da hataz who say Manny wuzn't ne good! Just wanna b rite about there opinions and ain't real fanzzzzz!! Manny caught 60+ passes, which iz awesome!" is likely to get an equal response from me.
No. But I know that when I presented the facts and stats (which clearly show Sanders to be average at best), I was told I was a douchey non-fan for saying it. Which now happens with every single Steeler criticism on this board. ****, look at Pouncey thread. I posted a long, complimentary opinion of Pouncey as a top-tier center who was worth Alex Mack money, and probably a great fit in our new scheme. But when I suggested that the extension may have come too early, the Pissypants Crew showed up on time to throw a fit.
Lather, rinse, repeat.