Shall we put this into perspective? For those Liberal whack-jobs that think being politically correct makes the world a better place, I present to you the 'slippery slope' argument.
Washington "Redskins", offensive because the word derogates the Indian by pointing him out by the color of his skin.
Were ye liberals aware of the origin of the name of the US State, Oklahoma?
http://www.statesymbolsusa.org/Oklahoma/Oklahomanameorigin.html#.U6IrmPsvbr0.facebook
"Oklahoma is based on Choctaw Indian words which translate as
red people (okla meaning "people" and humma meaning "red"). Recorded history for the name "Oklahoma" began with Spanish explorer Coronado in 1541 on his quest for the "Lost City of Gold." Oklahoma became the 46th state on November 16, 1907."
Certainly, if the USPTO believes that Redskins is derogatory, then and therefore, the State of Oklahoma must change it's name...right?
Certainly, the rational man must admit that red skin and red man are, in fact, synonymous?