Warren moon also played in what was acknowledged to be the toughest division in foot ball and had to play the Steelers twice every year. The bengals and browns were tough in those days as well. I often remember thinking that if the oilers were in the NFC they would have been playing the Steelers in the big game. They were a good team and moon was an excellent QB.
Did not say steeler dynasty. Moon would have been playing the steelers d which has been very good for decades. Our offense has been luke warm which was one of many reasons our team was not in the playoffs. Still was a defensive division. My thoughts on the big game were of moons predecessor with the oilers in Bradshaw's era though so I was having an error of era's, and sit corrected. As to being out of my mind regarding brady and manning we will have to disagree. Manning does well against lessor opposition but lost in the playoffs a lot and that is the time the games were on the line against better competition. He manning did not seem to be the edge that allowed his team to beat its opponents. Great mastery of the game and very good qb but not a big game winner. Brady a dink and dunk quarterback that benefited from cheating and some very timely penalties and unusual calls. Both of these guys could easily be in the hall of fame because it is not based solely on ability but is a media event. One does not have to be the best to get in, look at some of the ones that are in Sapp anyone. The thing I was putting out was my opinion as Woodson and Sapp were putting out theirs. As it stands now I do not consider Brady or Manning hall of fame material above all other candidates for the reasons I listed, your opinion may differ and that is fine, I also believe that is called a discussion when two people express their own view points on the same topic.
