• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Sounds like Trubisky is taking hold of QB1 Job

Check my "reaction score..." Now extrapolate it out to the length of time you've been posting inquiries on this message system... Bottom line, I get at least 3 people reacting to my posts.... Not a bad ratio... That's the "Rent-free in your head..." part... Pretty brilliant for a low IQ, huh???
wait do you understand math?

you have 151 posts and a reaction score of 34 so you average reaction per post is your reaction score divided by your post count or 34/151 = 0.22516556
 
wait do you understand math?

you have 151 posts and a reaction score of 34 so you average reaction per post is your reaction score divided by your post count or 34/151 = 0.22516556
Seriously though, who keeps track of their reaction score, tries to compute what it means, and then shares their general ignorance by (incorrectly) bragging about it?
Never mind, that question answers itself. A narcissistic *** hat.
 
wait do you understand math?

you have 151 posts and a reaction score of 34 so you average reaction per post is your reaction score divided by your post count or 34/151 = 0.22516556
Coolie = 1.65
Badcat = 1.66

200.gif
 
wait do you understand math?

you have 151 posts and a reaction score of 34 so you average reaction per post is your reaction score divided by your post count or 34/151 = 0.22516556


Coolie, he got most of those "likes" within his first 30 post(s) as most were being friendly and kind. Once most here wittnessed his general
Twattwafflenism............... those likes came fewer and further apart. Soon he will be bottomed out.


Salute the nation
 
Seriously though, who keeps track of their reaction score, tries to compute what it means, and then shares their general ignorance by (incorrectly) bragging about it?
Never mind, that question answers itself. A narcissistic *** hat.
Try again, nice person... What is 113/12,789?? 0.0088
What is 28/151 (152, now...) 0.1842...
An almost 20X factor....
I don't know where you got edumacated, but send your diploma back...
 
Try again, nice person... What is 113/12,789?? 0.0088
What is 28/151 (152, now...) 0.1842...
An almost 20X factor....
I don't know where you got edumacated, but send your diploma back...

Jeepers shitsizzle, are you that fuckingssss dumb?

Maybe I shouldn't be so hard on you as i guess it's possible you fell and hit your head as a small child causing developMENTAL issues.

There is no response for your tawattwaffling spasic response



Salute the nation
 
A more accurate representation of how awesome you are would be the reactions given per number of posts. Given the number of times you've posted on this thread it's pretty evident that you're not as popular as you think you are.

To make matters worse, yes you had 3 reactions but you only had 2 that reacted to your posts.. One person reacted twice.
I didn't make up this arbitrary points system... If you want to figure differently, do whatever hels you sleep at night...
 
Try again, nice person... What is 113/12,789?? 0.0088
What is 28/151 (152, now...) 0.1842...
An almost 20X factor....
I don't know where you got edumacated, but send your diploma back...
113 is as high as the points are going to go....so why don't you compare his 7501 reaction score s his post count which would be a 0.88958 average vs your 0.22516
 
113 is as high as the points are going to go....so why don't you compare his 7501 reaction score s his post count which would be a 0.88958 average vs your 0.22516
Reactions are positive or negative. That's not an accurate measure... Points aren't awarded for negative reactions... Try paying closer attention...
 
113 is as high as the points are going to go....so why don't you compare his 7501 reaction score s his post count which would be a 0.88958 average vs your 0.22516
Funny thing is that he started out talking about "reaction score" and you schooled him. He obviously did give a "gram of ****" when I said only a narcissistic *** hat even pays attention to that **** and then ignorantly and incorrectly boasts about it. So, in response, he "derrs" and tries to talk about "points" ... which, again, only a narcissistic *** hat even pays attention to... Doubling down on being an *** hat. That's a good look.
 
Funny thing is that he started out talking about "reaction score" and you schooled him. He obviously did give a "gram of ****" when I said only a narcissistic *** hat even pays attention to that **** and then ignorantly and incorrectly boasts about it. So, in response, he "derrs" and tries to talk about "points" ... which, again, only a narcissistic *** hat even pays attention to... Doubling down on being an *** hat. That's a good look.

Funny thing is, I never mentioned reactions, I mentioned points.... Don't cross the streams....
 
Funny thing is that he started out talking about "reaction score" and you schooled him. He obviously did give a "gram of ****" when I said only a narcissistic *** hat even pays attention to that **** and then ignorantly and incorrectly boasts about it. So, in response, he "derrs" and tries to talk about "points" ... which, again, only a narcissistic *** hat even pays attention to... Doubling down on being an *** hat. That's a good look.

Funny thing is, I never mentioned reactions, I mentioned points.... Don't cross the streams....
9.95
 
Seriously though, who keeps track of their reaction score, tries to compute what it means, and then shares their general ignorance by (incorrectly) bragging about it?
Never mind, that question answers itself. A narcissistic *** hat.
I just elevated your reaction score. PS i have the day off and am enjoying adult beverages
 
Funny thing is that he started out talking about "reaction score" and you schooled him. He obviously did give a "gram of ****" when I said only a narcissistic *** hat even pays attention to that **** and then ignorantly and incorrectly boasts about it. So, in response, he "derrs" and tries to talk about "points" ... which, again, only a narcissistic *** hat even pays attention to... Doubling down on being an *** hat. That's a good look.

Funny thing is, I never mentioned reactions, I mentioned points.... Don't cross the streams....
just because you went back and edited post #196 doesn't change the fact that you started off discussing reaction score. Your initial post of 196 was quoted in post 201 so stop lying

and as a very intelligent poster pointed out to you Points top out at 113 so your whole argument is bullshit
 
Last edited:
Damn and here I thought cooch was slow, he makes cooch look like a rocket scientist.


I'd take coach over this Twattwaffle anytime.


Salute the nation
 
Would you let coach drive the luxury s10?


Highly doubtful BUT, I'd give you the keys and a tank full of gas so you could drive him around like in a parade...................... he could be the parade marshall !!! Tex Coach



Salute the nation
 
I just elevated your reaction score. PS i have the day off and am enjoying adult beverages
I am working and will have a few later. I'm thinking Bourbon tonight!
 
Funny thing is that he started out talking about "reaction score" and you schooled him. He obviously did give a "gram of ****" when I said only a narcissistic *** hat even pays attention to that **** and then ignorantly and incorrectly boasts about it. So, in response, he "derrs" and tries to talk about "points" ... which, again, only a narcissistic *** hat even pays attention to... Doubling down on being an *** hat. That's a good look.

Funny thing is, I never mentioned reactions, I mentioned points.... Don't cross the streams....
Do you know what's really funny? What's really funny is that you went back and edited your post in this thread (#196) to change what you said from "reaction score" to points. It's even funnier that the post itself shows that you edited it today. Most funny is that anyone who reads Coolie's unedited response to your post (#201), where he quotes you, can see what a little fibber you are.
I'm kinda flattered that you actually edited your post in response to what I said. But, I'm not sure that I want to live "rent free" in a liar's head.
Thanks for playing slick.
Next time try some of that upper-tier thinking you go on about.
 
Top