• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Steelers make trade for CB

Gay isn't chopped liver. Best DB last year. Like I said because of the money Allen will get a long look. We have no depth. You can state this trade was made with Allen in mind. And I won't argue but I still think it was a depth move. And not tied to Allen directly

Gay is a solid corner, but they are doing him and the team a disservice by having him on the outside as a starter. He is excellent when working the slot and seemed to consistently rank as one of the better nickel corners in the league. But I agree it's not tied entirely to Allen. They have three NFL cornerbacks on the roster and their No. 3 is best suited as a No. 4. And as you said, Allen will get every chance given his contract.
 
Gay isn't chopped liver. Best DB last year. Like I said because of the money Allen will get a long look. We have no depth. You can state this trade was made with Allen in mind. And I won't argue but I still think it was a depth move. And not tied to Allen directly


indirectly if you like, it does provide insurance if Allen falters.

Now I want to see the significance of Shamarko's injury.

There might be another move needed at SS.
 
Wait ... This guy's Combine Profile at NFL.Com has him listed at 5'9" .... Wasn't the concern about Golson that he was only ... 5'9"?

Tombert doesn't like CB's taller than 5'11" so they can bite Gronk and Megratron on the ankles.
 
Gay isn't chopped liver. Best DB last year. Like I said because of the money Allen will get a long look. We have no depth. You can state this trade was made with Allen in mind. And I won't argue but I still think it was a depth move. And not tied to Allen directly

I don't disagree with any of that except I think Allen is a bigger part than Golson who nobody knows can even play in the NFL. Allen was horrible last year and Gay can be moved to the slot. What happens if Allen sucks again? You think they are going to keep Boykin in the slot even if Golson can't go? Boykin is already the best CB on the team. Why would they limit him to the slot?
 
Most here can see this is a good deal. EVEn I, out training for my next kayak challenge, paddling way past fatigue and faltering muscle memory, hoping to get a drink of water in about twenty minutes, would still be able to PULL the trigger on this one.




Salute the nation
 
PS........ and determine that t*mmy b*y and bilicheat both should be banned for life !!!!!!!!!!!!!





Salute the nation
 
I don't disagree with any of that except I think Allen is a bigger part than Golson who nobody knows can even play in the NFL. Allen was horrible last year and Gay can be moved to the slot. What happens if Allen sucks again? You think they are going to keep Boykin in the slot even if Golson can't go? Boykin is already the best CB on the team. Why would they limit him to the slot?


could actually see Boykin and Gay on the outside with Allen in the slot.

I think that would be a winning formula........
 
Well the front office saw there might/is a issue with our secondary and they made a move early on. Good trade. All the Eagles fans I know(I live in Eagle land) are sick and tired of what Kelly is doing to their team. It is one thing to trade someone but when you get basically nothing in return..... Thanks Chip. You helped us out. I'm starting to like him more and more. LOL
 
Great pickup, he instantly becomes our best CB and strengthens a very poor secondary.
 
Good trade, I like it and have always liked Boykin as a play maker.

Remember The Candy Bar incident with Antonio Brown? LOL
 
Was looking at his advanced stats over on footballoutsiders. He had a better year than Maxwell, who they threw 60m at. Guy seems to have been targeted a ton, but his adjusted yards per attempt was only 6.2, which is fabulous. Looks like a steal, and even if he's a 1 and done, a good year would get him a sizeable contract and us a nice compensatory pick.
 
Was looking at his advanced stats over on footballoutsiders. He had a better year than Maxwell, who they threw 60m at. Guy seems to have been targeted a ton, but his adjusted yards per attempt was only 6.2, which is fabulous. Looks like a steal, and even if he's a 1 and done, a good year would get him a sizeable contract and us a nice compensatory pick.

If he has a good year hopefully our FO deals out a contract offer that is market value. His NFL career to this point has been exceptional.
 
Great pickup, he instantly becomes our best CB and strengthens a very poor secondary.

Well this is ONE move our FO got right. Who would of thought. They are earning their money now.
 
Was looking at his advanced stats over on footballoutsiders. He had a better year than Maxwell, who they threw 60m at. Guy seems to have been targeted a ton, but his adjusted yards per attempt was only 6.2, which is fabulous. Looks like a steal, and even if he's a 1 and done, a good year would get him a sizeable contract and us a nice compensatory pick.

I'm not sure a traded player is eligible for compensatory picks.
 
I'm not sure a traded player is eligible for compensatory picks.


I wasn't entirely positive, and was going to go back and edit the post to say "probably" a nice pick. But I looked and the Pats traded for Blount during the 2013 draft, he played out all the season there and then was part of the calculation for them obtaining a 2015 pick. So indeed we would get a pick in 2017 if he's one and done.

Anyways, he're hoping if he's good we just keep him instead of losing him via FA or having him become our latest transition/franchise tag debacle.
 
A fifth to play for a guy who was drafted this year at 2. Ill take that trade. Golson is badly hurt. They will be putting him on the IR the appropriate time. They can't put him on the recall, because that is one player. Who knows what else will happen.
 
we get instant depth, pushing Allen to improve his play, sending Blake to the 4th spot and giving insurance in case of injury to Gay.
Great move
 
He had 6 Ints in a season. When't the last time we got 6 ints out of a corner?
 
Awesome news, Boykin can make plays on the ball, he'll be a great asset to have.
 
He had 6 Ints in a season. When't the last time we got 6 ints out of a corner?

When's the last time our entire secondary had 6 INT's?
 
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/25256985/eagles-trade-cb-brandon-boykin-to-steelers

Secondary upgrade addresses Steelers need: The Steelers had one of the NFL's worst pass defenses last season, as they ranked 23rd in completion percentage allowed, 27th in passing yards allowed per game, 28th in yards per pass allowed, passing touchdowns allowed and opponents' passer rating and 30th in Football Outsiders' passing defense DVOA.

Pittsburgh drafted Senquez Golson and Doran Grant, but those were the only significant imports made at the position. Incumbents Cortez Allen – who struggled badly in the first season of a four-year, $24.6 million contract – and William Gay returned, but neither of them was very successful in coverage last season. Boykin will likely be the best corner on the Steelers from the moment he hits the roster.


Low-cost acquisition, but what will it cost to keep Boykin? Boykin is the seventh player to be traded for a fifth-round pick this offseason, following Brandon Marshall, Mike Wallace, Ben Grubbs, Jeremy Zuttah, Jonathan Casillas and George Johnson. All but one of those players is at least 29 years old, though, and Boykin is still just 25. He likely has more room to grow than any of them, and he's already near the top of the list (with Marshall and Wallace) in terms of pure football talent. The Steelers got themselves a very nice deal here, provided they can lock Boykin up long-term at a reasonable price.

By way of reference, Harris – the only slot-heavy corner to allow a lower QB rating than Boykin over the last two seasons – signed a five-year, $42.5 million contract that contained $24 million in guarantees and a $10 million signing bonus. That deal was widely viewed as a great one for the Broncos, but it's doubtful Boykin earns a contract as large as Harris, who has already shown the ability to play all over the field that Boykin wants to show off.

Skrine, meanwhile, signed a four-year, $25 million contract with the Jets that contained $13 million guaranteed and a $5 milllion signing bonus. Boykin has largely outperformed Skrine during their careers thus far, so a deal somewhere north of that would probably make sense, based purely on performance.

However, if you judge Boykin's value by the fact that he was just dealt away for a conditional fifth-round draft choice, it seems probable he won't be getting a deal larger than Skrine's before this season starts. If he has another season like his last two, though, he could garner himself an even bigger payday.
 
Low-cost acquisition, but what will it cost to keep Boykin? .

We're worry about next year, next year! He didn't cost us much of anything and our secondary stinks.

We're trying to win THIS year! Holy ****. Ben only has a handful of years left.
 
Agreed Spike. The Steelers may be smart to do something now with Boykin though, along the lines of Skrine's contract, as opposed to waiting for him to hit the market. He's arguably the best corner we've had here in a while...may be smart to lock him up now. If not, and if he ends up being a one-year rental, I'm cool with that too. Still shocked the Steelers were able to get a young talent like him at this stage...
 
Last edited:
Top