- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,169
- Reaction score
- 20,119
- Points
- 113
I don't know what to make of this. Value wise it's about average. The fact Boykin only has 1 year left on his deal is not good for us. The value of that draft pick is to find a guy for cheap for 4 seasons. Boykin isn't cheap and he isn't long term. After this year his value is dictated by the free agent market and as I've pounded on and on about the Golson pick, this shows you the exact value of "nickel defensive backs". They are available if you look around.
It just further confuses me about what we saw in Golson to think he's worth a 2nd round pick. Makes no sense to me from a cost analysis or resource analysis.
And now we add yet another undersized nickel defender into a group of undersized nickel defenders. The fact Boykin is probably the most talented just speaks volumes to the confusion we have about the position. A month ago, every bullshit pro-Steelers local story was how Blake was going to emerge this season. Obviously that was wrong because Boykin is just a better Blake.
To me this trade represents a clusterfuck at the position not a positive. It represents confusion in the front office and coaching staffs. It represents panic already.
Will it make us a better team in 2015? Probably slightly. I never was sold on Blake, Golson or Grant before this and I've like Boykin as a player for a while (I've seen a lot of him being in the Philly market) and I liked him coming out of college. But when you are looking at 1-year rental players on August 1st to fix your depth charts, that's not a good sign.
At this point I think Gay and Allen will end up the outside starters and Boykin will be the nickel defender. We'll keep Blake and both rookies will make the roster (Golson/Grant). But that also means our supposed "rookie fixes" that everyone was so optimistic about after the draft will be buried as the #5 and #6 CB's on the roster and never see playing time.
Typical Steelers draft. Overdraft need positions, find out they can't play, then bury 'em on the depth chart and sell us on "future returns" while we struggle with journeyman free agents getting playing time and struggling.
I do not see a negative to this move. If he is only here for 1 year then chances are we will get a 4th of 5th comp pic for him. if he signs a long term deal we get a 25yr old upgrade at corner. we don't have to rush the youngs guys into service, they can actually be developed until they are ready to play. where is the bad news?