The Climate Change Thread
- Thread starter Tim Steelersfan
- Start date
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2014
- Messages
- 7,022
- Reaction score
- 7,060
- Points
- 113
The correct response is QBR.
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2014
- Messages
- 7,022
- Reaction score
- 7,060
- Points
- 113
Fizuck you Saul Goodman is public domain and fair use.
Thank you, come again! And remember - QBO!!
My man.. Continue to rest in constant turmoil Sam. Much more entertaining than peace.
I'd like to think that if the likes of Carlin, Kinison and Pryor were alive today, they'd be giving a big FU to the artificially offended.
I'm thinking of changing my last name on FB to "Based".
Flog got a new hat?
Liberals: It's not about being right, or the facts, or the truth; it's all about feelings.
That's why a high school dropout is a leftist "expert" on climate change.
Saw this EV article by Scotty and thought it was good info. We gonna get them, like it or not.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 5,653
- Reaction score
- 12,537
- Points
- 113
I like this guy's videos but, I can't take his voice for very long.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 21,199
- Reaction score
- 23,552
- Points
- 113
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 9,455
- Reaction score
- 12,507
- Points
- 113
And only 5-9% of all the recycled plastic actually gets recycled.
It's always been a scam.
It's always been a scam.
Temperature stations - part of the calculations by NOAA about the DOOM! for global warming - are 96% put in locations that NOAA itself deems unacceptable.
NOAA claims that it uses statistical corrections to account for the flawed locations for the temperature stations, but that claim is demonstrably false. The data are overstating "warming" by 50%. Wow, shocking. Almost as if they have been lying to us for 40 years about the entire scam.
NOAA claims that it uses statistical corrections to account for the flawed locations for the temperature stations, but that claim is demonstrably false. The data are overstating "warming" by 50%. Wow, shocking. Almost as if they have been lying to us for 40 years about the entire scam.
This video although it doesn't refute climate change, it does imply that there isn't a damn thing we can do about it.
It states that if all emissions on the planet stopped tomorrow, nothing would change. At 2:45 in the video it claims it would take approximately 100,000 years for the Co2 levels to return to pre-industrial revolution levels.
Co2 levels released into the atmosphere by humans that amount to nothing but a fart in a hurricane.
100,000 years for any type of change if all emissions stopped tomorrow? Go **** yourself.
It states that if all emissions on the planet stopped tomorrow, nothing would change. At 2:45 in the video it claims it would take approximately 100,000 years for the Co2 levels to return to pre-industrial revolution levels.
Co2 levels released into the atmosphere by humans that amount to nothing but a fart in a hurricane.
100,000 years for any type of change if all emissions stopped tomorrow? Go **** yourself.
Then there's this former climate change warrior Christian Figueres.
What does she mean "change/transform" the economic model?
Sounds like a global distribution of wealth scheme to me.
Christiana Figueres Quotes
Appointed Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change in July 2010- This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the industrial revolution. That will not happen overnight and it will not happen at a single conference on climate change, be it COP 15, 21, 40 - you choose the number. It just does not occur like that. It is a process, because of the depth of the transformation.
Christiana Figueres
- This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model, for the first time in human history.
Christiana Figueres
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 9,455
- Reaction score
- 12,507
- Points
- 113
OPM
What does she mean "change/transform" the economic model?
Sounds like a global distribution of wealth scheme to me.
Christiana Figueres Quotes
Appointed Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change in July 2010
- This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the industrial revolution. That will not happen overnight and it will not happen at a single conference on climate change, be it COP 15, 21, 40 - you choose the number. It just does not occur like that. It is a process, because of the depth of the transformation.
Christiana Figueres
- This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model, for the first time in human history.
Christiana Figueres
Other
People's
Money
It's much easier to redistribute wealth wheen you take OPM first.
It is always best to be first among equals
Everyone must turn off their AC tomorrow. Who is going to throw the biggest fit?
Similar threads
